• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Small Town Sympathy Shouldn’t Trump Common Sense Trade Policy

    Recent negotiations of the Trans-Pacific Partnership have sent representatives of government supported industries, like New Balance shoes, scrambling for political help to maintain their high tariffs. While an economic case can’t be made for keeping these tariffs in place, proponents are touching a much more emotional one: culture.

    New England has always stood out from the rest of the United States for its embrace of small town manufacturing, which, in its time, contrasted sharply with the huge, vertically integrated factories of the Midwest, like Henry Ford’s River Rouge Complex in Dearborn, Michigan. In its infancy, New England manufacturing revolved around textiles, with firms taking advantage of hydropower from the area’s quick running rivers.

    From these roots the “mill town” evolved—towns that developed specifically because of the work produced from the factory. These “mill towns” produced a whole generation of workers that prospered in the mills—towns like Lowell, Lawrence, and Pittsfield, Massachusetts.

    Over the years international competition and America’s evolving economy have made many of these industries obsolete, yet the cultural image of idyllic towns with their home-grown manufacturing remains. And so does the desire to protect them through wasteful tariffs that make up for their lack of competitiveness. Arguing for the tariff protection for the few remaining small-town industries, Senator Olympia Snowe (R–ME) said:

    Small towns across America…are home to these companies [and] depend on footwear-related manufacturing jobs…the elimination of duties on Vietnamese and Malaysian footwear could give these countries an overwhelming competitive advantage that could put domestic manufacturers at a potentially insurmountable disadvantage.

    This cultural soft spot for small town manufacturing is epitomized by New Balance, whose Lawrence, Massachusetts factory resides in a 19th century textile mill. This ancient multi-storied mill has to compete with huge, modern, and efficient plants in Vietnam.

    So how does it succeed? It gets the U.S. government to raise its competitor’s prices between 10 percent and 38.5 percent through import tariffs. In the end it is the American consumers who literally pay this price.

    Embracing the cultural heritage of manufacturing in New England is honorable, but doing it at the expense of American consumers who suffer from the high prices that these tariffs cause is just selfish. We should want more from our economy than manufacturing jobs that our great-great-grandparents had. Protecting old industries is not the way to make America more competitive in the 21st century.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Small Town Sympathy Shouldn’t Trump Common Sense Trade Policy

    1. Tom says:

      It's everyone's first instinct to protect their own. The big picture though is to protect all consumers. There is no need to pay more than is necessary. I buy New Balance because I like them not because they are the cheapest product available. I did not know they were made in the US until this article. They have a reputation of providing a quality product. They need to couple that more with made in the USA and more people will buy their stuff. I'm for free markets. They provide the best economic conditions for everyone.

    2. lanternRogue says:

      "Protecting old industries is not the way to make America more competitive in the 21st century."
      Translation: wages are too high

    3. Joe Brooks says:

      Unfortunately, Ryan has no clue what is really going on in International Trade. Anyone who looks up the protections of 150 other nations, will realize US unilateral free trade is lunacy.

      The truth is, the US does not compete in the real world of International Trade, at all.

      150 other nations have Import Tariffs, Value Added Taxes [Bribes], Currency Manipulation, Border Duties, that add up to a 300% import tariff in many cases. The US has an average 2.5% import tariff, the lowest in the world.

      The US has by far, the largest Trade Deficit in the history of the world. “free trade” = suicide.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×