• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • VP Debate Moderator Has Close Obama Ties

    Martha Raddatz at Sesame Workshop’s 8th Annual Benefit Gala. (Photo: PNP/WENN.com)

    It’s a pretty big story that Barack Obama attended the wedding of Martha Raddatz, the ABC News senior foreign correspondent picked as the moderator for Thursday night’s vice presidential debate.

    It’s an especially good story since Obama was close enough to the groom, Julius “Jay” Genachowski, that he appointed him as chairman of the Federal Communications Commission shortly after being sworn in as President almost 20 years later.

    Funny thing is, The Daily Caller, which first learned that Obama was a guest at the 1991 wedding, is not exactly getting credit from politicos and fellow news outfits for keeping ’em honest. Even though the October 10 story was Dally Caller reporter Josh Peterson’s eyebrow-raising follow-up to his August 23 report first detailing the Obama–Raddatz–Genachowski connection.

    Actually, not many eyebrows raised—until the Drudge Report led with a link to Peterson’s story. ABC News dispatched spokesman David Ford to play down and beat back Peterson’s guest-at-the-wedding story by “pre-leaking” it October 9 to sympathetic outlets such as The Daily Beast and Huffington Post.

    “This is absurd,” Ford huffed.

    But is this more important than Big Bird?

    Yes, Raddatz and Genachowski divorced in 1997, about 10 years before Genachowski used his net-roots know-how to help his buddy from the Harvard Law Review, a freshman U.S. senator, win the White House.

    But the news business used to say the angle for this kind of story was the need to avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest in public matters. Good newsrooms applied the principle and the angle to situations involving liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans.

    But Mike McCurry, co-chairman of the Commission on Presidential Debates that runs the show and picks the moderators, says he doesn’t see it that way.

    In August, McCurry told The Daily Caller:

    We selected the [debate] moderators based on their reputations for integrity and journalistic impartiality among other things. What counts is the quality of their work, not who they may have been married to in the past.

    McCurry, a communications pro and former press secretary to President Clinton, knows better. And he knows he knows better. Picture this: President George W. Bush is in the final days of a tough re-election fight. A liberal news organization reports that the moderator of the upcoming vice presidential debate used to be married to Bush’s FCC chairman. It follows up with a story that Bush himself had attended their wedding. The moderator’s employer trashes the story before it’s published.

    One can imagine the media asking some hardball questions about the moderator’s ability to be fair. The news organization that employs the moderator—not to mention the sponsoring debate commission, its reputation also at stake—might feel pressure to be super-transparent in disclosing the potential conflict and describing steps to ensure no bias in favor of the Bush ticket.  Even to the point of replacing the moderator.

    Peterson’s stories on ABC’s Raddatz seek to ask and answer some of the right questions, as did Daily Caller colleague Neil Munro’s earlier one on the leftward leanings of the debate commission.

    It’s not hard to imagine the sort of questions that any good reporter or assignment editor would want answered:

    • Did ABC News or the Commission on Presidential Debates ask Raddatz about personal ties to either side? (And did the debate commission do so before making its other moderator picks?)
    • What was the nature of Raddatz’s relationship with Obama in 1991, and how did it change over the years?
    • When did Raddatz disclose her ties to Obama, including his attending her wedding, to superiors at ABC News? If she didn’t, why not? If she did, what ethical constraints did ABC put on her? When and how did the debate commission learn of these ties, and to what extent?
    • Can ABC spokesman Ford back up his written assertion that “nearly the entire [Harvard] Law Review” attended the Raddatz–Genachowski wedding, implying that Obama’s presence was no big deal? (A contemporaneous photo shows the law review had 70 staffers at the time.) If Ford doesn’t have those facts, why did he circulate that assertion to reporters?
    • And finally, now that The Daily Caller has followed up its August 23 report of the Obama–Raddatz–Genachowski connection with the wedding story, how do ABC and the debate commission plan to fully inform the public before the debate begins at 9 p.m. Thursday?

    If these and related questions aren’t answered before the candidates for vice president take the stage in Danville, Kentucky, it’s fair to keep them in mind as Raddatz questions both men.

    Ken McIntyre, who reported, assigned and edited news stories during 25 years with local and national newspapers, most recently as an assistant managing editor at The Washington Times through 2006, is Heritage’s Marilyn and Fred Guardabassi Fellow in Media and Public Policy Studies.

    Posted in Featured, First Principles, Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    8 Responses to VP Debate Moderator Has Close Obama Ties

    1. @undefined says:

      Actually, I think it will be an even sweeter victory for Romney/Ryan when "against all odds" and "various tortures of leverage" they are able to capture the American heart and ascend to office.

    2. Bobbie says:

      He's just filled with surprises, isn't he? What one hides of importance regarding himself, isn't for long!! He befriends conflicts of interests for America's sake don't you know? UNACCEPTABLE! Bush wasn't seen with conflicts of interests that Obama wasn't a part of whom Bush had to bow to.

      Bush: Settle down democrats, I'm signing YOUR TARP (cover) BILL so you can blame me…

    3. Bill Hulsey says:

      The news media is being very hush hush on this one regarding Martha Raddatz being in the loop with Obama, and Of course the Obama administration is going to try to win at any cost. unfortunately we as Americans no longer have an objective, reliable news source.

    4. Richard says:

      Considering Jim Lehrer got in all of 30 seconds of dialogue, gonna classify this as NBD.

      It's one thing to look at someone's work and pick apart bias… but here there's none of that. Just conservative blogger scumbags with a vendetta and some crazy idea that every. single. person. who works for ABC/NBC/CBS is WILDLY BIASED! Tin foil hats, everyone, stat!

      Your article left out that attendees of her wedding also went on to serve in the Bush administration. So would that make her sympathetic to the Republican side? Don't see that angle being played up by Daily Caller. Odd.

      Perhaps we should focus less on friends of a husband divorced 15 years ago and more on integrity of reporting?

      • Brad S., Detroit says:

        The point of the article is that it gives off the appearance of impropriety when it is hidden. If the shoe were on the other foot, i.e – a Republican president running for re-election with a conversative right-leaning moderator, all the talking heads in the Mainstream Media would be shouting from the rooftop that the debate is rigged. I just love the selective hypocrisy from liberals.

    5. Godfather says:

      me: how about you appoint a fox news anchor or sean hannity people with proven integrity? them "o no um we can do that yeah uh, we wil stick to the libera… I mean um biast, er unbiast stations yes. Thank you"

    6. Al Metcalf says:

      This should have all been in the public arena. But, when we are working with Liberal Democrats we never expect a fair shake on any issue or action. A Liberal is a Liveral and we never expect a leopard to attempt to change their spots. It would be like Biden all of a sudden behaving like a man with scruples….

    7. Carol Berg says:

      Can't we find a reporter to be a commenter on the debates that is impartial at least somewhat trying to get the facts out, and let both parties have a turn at speaking? If Obama went to Martha's wedding, they must be on the same page. I'm sick of all news media not reporting the news, but trying to manipulate the news and slant it to their party.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.