• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Despite Arms Reduction Treaty, Russia Is Increasing Its Nuclear Capability

    About a year and a half ago, the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START) entered into force. The Obama Administration ensured the American people and the Senate that the treaty would contribute to strategic stability between the United States and the Russian Federation.

    The treaty was touted as a crown jewel of the Administration’s “reset” policy, but yet another State Department data declaration confirms that the treaty is hopelessly biased in the Kremlin’s favor and that the “reset” policy is in shambles.

    The treaty, in fact, undermines strategic stability. The State Department’s data show that Russia lowered the number of its intercontinental-range ballistic missiles (ICBM), submarine-launched ballistic missiles—or bombers—by three (compared to the March 1, 2012, data declaration).

    At the same time, the country increased the number of its accountable warheads by seven (if the March 1, 2012, data declaration is taken as a baseline of comparison). This means that the Russians are putting more nuclear warheads, or Multiple Independent Reentry Vehicles (MIRVs), on each of their delivery vehicles. The process is also known as MIRVing and has been considered destabilizing for decades because it is said to incentivize the other side to strike first.

    The Obama Administration recognized this in its 2010 Nuclear Posture Review and ordered all U.S. ICBMs be deployed with one nuclear warhead to “enhance the stability of the nuclear balance by reducing the incentives for either side to strike first.” The Administration, however, did nothing to negotiate a ban on MIRVing in New START, and the Russians are taking the advantage of this loophole. Currently, Moscow out-MIRVs the U.S. by one per each accountable deployed delivery system.

    To exacerbate the disparity, the U.S. is the only state with nuclear weapons without a substantive nuclear weapons modernization program. Since New START entered into force, the Russians have announced the most massive nuclear weapons build-up since the end of the Cold War. Over time, if the U.S. does not change its policy or Russia adopts a fundamentally different strategic posture, Washington policymakers will be left with a qualitative and quantitative disadvantage vis-à-vis Moscow and potentially other nuclear-armed states.

    President Obama touted New START as an essential step on the road toward a world free of nuclear weapons—U.S. nuclear weapons, that is, because the assumption that if the U.S. unilaterally disarms, others will follow, is just not true.

    Historically, South Africa gave up its nuclear weapons while the U.S. built up and tested its nuclear weapons. North Korea and Pakistan emerged as new nuclear weapons players, while the U.S. reduced its nuclear weapons and stopped testing them.

    Countries base their nuclear weapons programs on their respective perceptions of threats, not on steps taken by the United States. In a world with many nuclear-armed players, it is important that the U.S. adopts a “protect and defend” strategic posture comprising offensive and defensive systems. Such a posture would allow the military to defend the American people, territories, institutions, and infrastructure from actors who mean the country and its allies harm.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to Despite Arms Reduction Treaty, Russia Is Increasing Its Nuclear Capability

    1. @undefined says:

      I think it's worth mentioning that USA is forcing a new nuclear arms race by locating missile defense systems in Europe. To counter that potential threat, Russia is now forced to modernise/increase its nuclear weapons in order to circumvent/overpower those defenses. Of course, US is saying that missle defense is aimed at Iran and North Korea, but even if that's true, it still constitues additional layer of defense against Russian missles. Russia simply is left with no other choices….

    2. bobbymike says:

      Great article, it is absolutely key the US begin to modernize the Triad of delivery systems and the nuclear weapons production enterprise.

      This is especially true of the MMIII ICBM and nuclear weapons R&D.

    3. Michaela Bendikova says:

      @undefined The United States is not forcing a new nuclear arms race. The Russians perceive it is in their interests to modernize their strategic forces and that is why they do it (while the United States has nuclear warheads based on the 1970s designs and technologies). Tens of interceptors in Europe do not have the potential to counter Russian ballistic missiles, thousand of short-range and long-range. In addition, U.S. interceptors are defensive and do not have offensive capabilities. Russia cares about preserving its ability to blackmail U.S. allies and the United States. Missile defense takes this ability away–and that is in the U.S. interest.

    4. All nuclear weapons long along with its science should be eradicated from the earth because its eventually going to happen anyway, might as well be a peaceful way.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×