• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Internet Freedom and YouTube Under Attack

    On September 27, Reporters Without Borders issued a report on the threat to Internet freedom that focused on the relationships of Google and YouTube in the Middle East and beyond.

    The call for censorship comes in response to the National Islamic Union’s complaint that Google has violated the “constitutional right to freedom of religion.” A number of countries have demanded that Google Inc. e-block any and all links to the controversial anti-Islamic video, Innocence of Muslims.

    Since the release of the film and the attacks in Benghazi, more than 10 countries have adopted the crusade against YouTube. The petitions have been justified on the pretense that the video will inevitably spark violence. Some countries have gone so far as banning entire websites and rendering Google’s search engines inaccessible for periods of time:

    • In Sudan, the National Communications Corp. has blocked YouTube access since September 15. Reports indicate that the government is capitalizing on the video to block a website popular with many Sudanese whistle-blowing dissidents.
    • In India, the Jammu and Kashmir regional governments have suspended access to the Internet since September 20 in anticipation of impending protests. The government allowed any measures to be taken that would ensure customers could not access the video.
    • In Brazil, a court ordered Google to withdraw a YouTube video containing scenes from the film and threatening a fine of 10,000 reals ($4,950) each day after if it failed to comply.
    • In Russia, a new Internet law coming into effect on November 1 will block the entire YouTube website if the company does not block the video by then. The law is intended to “protect minors against dangerous content.”

    As it has been well-stated, the Internet is not to blame for the protests and violence in the region, and government censorship is always an inappropriate and immoral way to address the problem. Allowing governments to censor the Internet is a dangerous precedent to set.

    Censorship of an offending website is directly linked to the suppression of dissenting speech. If left unchallenged, expect to see greater censorship of both the Internet and regular speech in the name of whatever excuse other nations find convenient.

    Caitlin Duvall is currently a member of the Young Leaders Program at The Heritage Foundation. For more information on interning at Heritage, please visit: http://www.heritage.org/about/departments/ylp.cfm.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Internet Freedom and YouTube Under Attack

    1. Bobbie says:

      Personal conduct is to blame and holding conduct accountable builds tolerance and common sense not to look where told to be offended and not to kill because of teachings promoting weak tolerances and personal insecurities. Censorship because people choose not to control their behavior? May the GOOD LORD convert sinners and strengthen the weak!!

    2. Bobbie says:

      if people are intolerant of someones' freedom to speak, create, then it's those that shouldn't have access to it! Don't touch freedom of anything because of intolerances. People can grow up!

      I can't tolerate the disrespect in swear words. You don't see me crying or killing! Endurance! I deal with it and understand it's probably how the person was raised with little discipline and no respect for the language. I don't excuse it, just tolerate it. People would rather use the words to force acceptance of their low intelligence. Especially when it's an extra word their communication doesn't need shows it's nothing but a careless bad habit or just who they are. When Samuel L Jackson told people to "wake the !@%? up" to vote in a tv commercial, I lost all admiration. I can't watch "a time to kill" or anything he does, again.

    3. Bobbie says:

      Let me clarify that. I choose not to watch him again…

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.