• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Michigan Ballot Measure Could Protect Drug-Dealing Teachers

    A teachers’ union contract in Bay City, MI, has become a focal point in the battle over a ballot measure in that state that seeks to provide legal guarantees for union collective bargaining agreements — and invalidate laws that conflict with those agreements.

    The contract allows teachers to show up for work drunk five times, or under the influence of drugs three times, before being fired. Under the agreement, a teacher caught selling drugs to students would be reprimanded, but fired only for repeating the offense.

    The union contract expired in June, but Bay City schools will operate under its provisions until the city agrees to a new one. Bay City officials have not said whether the new contract will retain these provisions.

    The contract has received attention of late due to a ballot measure known as Proposal 2, which would enshrine collective bargaining agreements in law, overturning a state law that prohibits unions from collectively bargaining on disciplinary issues.

    According to a summary posted on the state’s website, Prop 2 would “Invalidate existing or future state or local laws that limit the ability to … negotiate and enforce collective bargaining agreements” and “override state laws that regulate hours and conditions of employment to the extent that those laws conflict with collective bargaining agreements.”

    In other words, any state law that conflicted with Bay City’s collective bargaining agreement would be invalidated by Prop 2, and those agreements would be the sole determinant of, among other measures, disciplinary measures for Bay City teachers.

    The exclusion of public input from government union contract decisions is an ever-present problem, Heritage labor policy expert James Sherk has noted. “Increasingly—and contrary to basic democratic principles—it is union leaders, not elected officials, who essentially decide how much taxes people pay, and how the government will spend those taxes,” Sherk wrote in a 2011 report.

    Prop 2 would insulate not just pay, but even basic disciplinary measures from input by elected leaders. The result could be a union contract that protects teachers who, say, sell drugs to students.

    Posted in Education, Scribe [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to Michigan Ballot Measure Could Protect Drug-Dealing Teachers

    1. This is in my back yard. You should see the shameless ads they're running to try to get this passed. They are telling us if we don't pass this, then "in addition to worrying about their education, have to start praying for their safety (empty swing swinging in the background)." It's sickening.

      • Lady Patriot says:

        I hope it doesn't pass for the sake of Michigan. It strikes me as wrong on every level. Laws are passed by state legislators. Exemptions to laws are passed by state legislators also. This seems to be totally unconstitutional. I hope that if this terrible thing passes, Michigan can find a judge who knows a law is a law is a law. If they have evidence a teacher committed a crime (selling drugs to minors) that teacher could be arrested. It is not illegal to be high so if these are just complaints by personnel, then what they want to do may very well be legal.

    2. EdWatson says:

      Chicago is nearby. Is that any hint?

    3. MITeacher says:

      Do you really think that a teacher who shows up to work drunk would not have a consequence that would include being fired? Give me a break! Unions do not and will not ever have the power to protect teachers/staff members that could harm children. Right now teachers can get fired regardless of tenure or unions. Prop 2 is not about unions, it is about protecting the teachers that work hard every single day to reach every single child.

    4. Julia McGee says:

      On what page of the contract is this stipulated, please?

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×