• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Another Day, Another Default: Postal Service to Miss $5.6 Billion Payment to Treasury

    In August, the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) failed to pay $5.5 billion due to the Treasury Department to fund health benefits for its retirees. This Sunday, USPS will miss a second payment to the Treasury, this time for $5.6 billion.

    This second default is no surprise; the USPS just doesn’t have the money to pay and hasn’t for some time. But the reality that the USPS is now a serial defaulter should not be lost on policymakers. Unless real reforms are adopted by Congress, cash shortfalls will continue, leaving U.S. taxpayers on the hook for tens of billions annually for debts the USPS cannot pay.

    The present financial disorder is no temporary hiccup for the postal system. It is not simply, as some have suggested, a result of the economic downturn or some sort of pension accounting mistake. The problem is that ever fewer Americans are mailing letters. In the third quarter of 2012, for instance, the number of first-class letters mailed was 12 percent less than the same quarter the previous year. USPS’s loss for the quarter: $5.2 billion.

    USPS management is hoping that it can squeak by for the rest of the year with no more defaults, helped—ironically enough—by election-year mailings. But the problem isn’t going away. Real reform is needed. And right now, the major impediment to that reform is Congress, which has blocked key efforts to cut costs, ranging from consolidating underused post offices to eliminating Saturday mail delivery.

    Proposals from both houses of Congress are pending. But the Senate reform proposal actually does little to allow USPS to make the fundamental changes that are needed, instead giving it massive infusions of cash. In the House, a bill clearing the way for deeper change, sponsored by Representative Darrel Issa (R–CA), is stalled.

    Meanwhile, a troubled USPS will stagger on in virtual bankruptcy, not knowing if it will be able to pay its bills next year and with taxpayers not knowing if they will end up paying the difference. As USPS CFO Joe Corbett said earlier this year, “This is no way to run a business.”

    Posted in Economics [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to Another Day, Another Default: Postal Service to Miss $5.6 Billion Payment to Treasury

    1. PAH says:

      It may not be a way to "run a business", that is a "private" business but it is the government way to run a business–a "political" business. The Post Office is all about politics and the expression "all politics is local" is truer here than anywhere else. Close little used branches means throwing firing "local" people, local people who vote and who have friends and family that vote. Representatives always want the pain to be in somebody else's district. But every district will be hurt. And this is an election year which means nothing will be done that will hurt local voting until after the election. What should be done? Spin it off as a private enterprise. Cut deliveries down to every other day. Increase costs for third class/junk mail. Close remote branches. Many things could and should be done but wont as long as it is a "government" business.

      • D. Kohler says:

        I agree with most of what you said, but closing remote branches would not be a good thing. In remote areas many times there isn't the population to attract cost effective services, such as Email and Internet providers which could and does replace USPS services.

    2. Pingback: Must Know Headlines — ExposeTheMedia.com

    3. fghj@ says:

      I'll miss the USPS…

    4. Chuck says:

      You are right. It is not an accounting mistake. it is the onerous 2006 PAEA law, which requires the USPS to prefund 75 years of annuitants health care in just 10 years. No other federal agency, no lower level of government, and no private company has this huge burden. It is sad that the Heritage Foundation can't see what it really happening. Congress is using the USPS, again, as a cash cow to reduce the federal deficit.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×