• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Public Diplomacy as Apology

    Judging by President Obama’s speech to the U.N. General Assembly yesterday, U.S. public diplomacy messaging on the Middle East crisis is stuck perpetually on a setting of “apology.”

    It has been this way since the much-criticized September 11 statement from the U.S. embassy in Cairo, which apologized to the threatening mob outside its gates for any hurt to Muslims’ “religious feelings.”

    In the National Interest yesterday, Heritage’s James Jay Carafano analyzes the implications and the lessons for U.S. public diplomacy in “Department of Babel”:

    In part, Obama has the wrong message. Rather than selling what America has to offer, all too often the president makes it sound like the United States is in withdrawal and retreat. That just invites aggression.

    But in part it is also because we have a State Department that looks more and more like a Tower of Babel that cannot effectively speak to the world.

    Even if the world were willing to change and Washington tailored its policies accordingly, this would not be enough. Unless we get our megaphone right, the U.S. government will remain a confusing voice among the chaos.

    The Cairo statement could be described as an act of desperation and bore every sign thereof, even lacking punctuation. As the U.S. embassy was being threatened by a violent mob outside its walls, the embassy website hosted a denunciation not of violence but of an offensive 14-minute YouTube video. It remained the official U.S. position for nine hours before it was removed under pressure from protests at home. On September 12, it was denounced by both the President and the Secretary of State.

    The State Department has embraced social media with a vengeance as a public diplomacy tool, also known as Public Diplomacy 2.0. In the first hours of the crisis on September 11, the embassy Twitter feed defended the statement against incredulous comments from other tweeters. Those tweets were later deleted.

    The stated policy of the U.S. government is “Internet freedom.” Yet, when it came to the YouTube video, the White House asked Google to “review” it, and it was subsequently taken down in several Muslim countries. There is a clear double standard at work, which countries engaging in Internet censorship will not have failed to notice.

    Starting with his Cairo speech in 2009, President Obama promised to combat any perceived insult to Islam. From supporting U.N. “anti-blasphemy” Resolution 12/16 to the Administration’s ceaseless denunciations of the offensive video, the U.S. public diplomacy stance has been accommodation of irrational rage. Yet as a recent Pew Center poll has demonstrated, in many Muslim countries, the view of the United States has actually declined during the Obama Administration.

    The after-action review of U.S. public diplomacy in the aftermath of the current crisis will be a copious exercise. Learning the lessons of what has gone wrong is the critical first step.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    One Response to Public Diplomacy as Apology

    1. Bobbie says:

      Too bad the President can’t support people who know life isn’t about looking to be offended. It’s about staying true to yourself and rising above what one or a nation of ones’ teachings use offenses as justification to kill human life. Minds are cheated by a book written and amended by men, inspired by one man. God, the human creator judges what you get away with on earth with discipline to the defiance of ANY men who think God created SOME men superior to the rest of men …

      Ones’ God given potential has nothing to do with President Obama! NOTHING!! It’s wrong for him to say anything in regard and only for political gain. People find that potential on ones’ own!! No government influence necessary!!

      If God didn’t want people to think for oneself, PEOPLE would’ve ALL been born from ONE WOMB!!!!!

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.