• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Michigan's Mandate for Pricier Energy

    If an energy technology has so much promise, why would you need a constitutional amendment to require its production? Energy consumers in Michigan should be asking this question.

    On the Michigan ballot this November is Proposal 3, or “25 x 25,” which sets out to amend the Michigan constitution to require utilities to provide 25 percent of the state’s electricity from renewable sources by 2025. This proposal is an extension of a cap passed in 2008 that required 10 percent of Michigan’s electricity to come from renewable energy by 2015.

    Before the 2008 mandate, only 3 percent of Michigan’s electricity came from renewables. Since then, customers of Michigan’s two largest utilities have shouldered some of the extra costs of subsidizing the renewable electricity customers on the order of $330 million.

    Proponents of the mandate argue that attracting green jobs, a cleaner environment, and greater energy security more than make up for the costs, though some are estimating costs to utilities and their customers could be at least $12 billion. The question is, would these high costs be worth it? Evidence has shown that the answer is no.

    The promises of green jobs have repeatedly fallen flat, even with the help of billions of dollars of federal investment in wind and solar companies, retrofitting programs, and consumer education. In fact, most of the jobs labeled by the federal government as “green” are occupations like bus drivers and garbage men. And that is to say nothing of the jobs never created or lost because of the Obama Administration’s regulatory war against fossil fuel energy, which has contributed to the nation’s lagging economy.

    Secondly, far from improving the environment, renewable portfolio standards and other backdoor climate policies have succeeded only in letting politicians get away with verbal counterfeiting: Politicians get votes for the mere perception of addressing climate change, but these policies will do nothing to impact global temperatures. If man-made climate change is a problem at all, it will take much more drastic (multilateral) action to make a significant impact on reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

    As for energy security, the simple fact is that renewable electricity sources would replace coal, which is largely produced domestically. This program would not replace imported oil, which provides barely any electricity generation. Furthermore, renewables only work when the sun shines and the wind blows—an odd way to ensure that Michigan has reliable and affordable electricity.

    At the core of this proposal is consumer choice. If renewable energy adds value to our energy portfolio, legislatures should not need a mandate forcing producers and consumers to use renewable energy. If there are enough consumers out there who want to pay a premium to use renewable energy, that demand will be met. If expensive renewable energy standards have to be met through government subsidies, then Michigan residents will lose out both as taxpayers and ratepayers.

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to Michigan's Mandate for Pricier Energy

    1. Stirling says:

      When the "Green" Bubble bursts, will people wake up and realize they have been scammed?

    2. John says:

      When the "green" bubble bursts?

      What about when coal and oil, which are FINITE resources, run out? Should human progress just stop? Should we just rely on those resources until they are gone and then scramble?

      Wind is extremely reliable in Michigan, thanks to the Great Lakes. Offshore wind is a viable and necessary solution.

      It appears the author is only aware of wind and solar, making no mention of biomass, biogas, syngas, or hydroelectric.

      For some reason the right wing of this country seems to think the only way to grow economically or create energy independence is to subsidize and rely on 100 year old technology. It's time to move on.

      • John Weaver says:

        even with a ideal wind source the wind farm turbines have to have huge tax subbsidies to stay afloat and most turbines are off-line due to continuous need for maintenece, creating huge overhead and un sustainable business models. Goes for wind, solar hydro-thermal, ethanol-gas (very worst idea ever dreamntup. idea- turning edible comodities (corn) into fuel poor-performaning substitutes. The real cost of smart hybred vehicles is astronomical considering initial setup investments in grid alterations PER HOUSE, opps dealer forgot to mention the taxes for that. We need cheap coal untill we can up -scale new technologies. None are even really new either.

      • Amy says:

        Except the Michigan Prop 3 doesn't allow for any renewable resources other than those listed in the constitutional amendment as proposed–wind, solar, hydro and biomass. No biogas, syngas, thermal, etc. Also, no energy efficiency included.

    3. Joe says:

      green enrgy means taking greenbacks from my family! I live in Michigan and see it every month in my utility bills. surchage this surchage that!

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×