• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Attempting to Decipher the Perplexing Rhetoric of Ahmadinejad's U.N. Speech

    Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s highly anticipated U.N. speech can be summed up in one word: erratic.

    Although he toned down most of the incendiary language he used in previous years, Ahmadinejad whined about how “the current world order is discriminatory and based on injustice.” To replace it, Ahmadinejad tried to lay out a framework to shape a “new world order” that he claimed would “revive human dignity” and be based upon “peace, lasting security and welfare for all walks of life around the globe.”

    Of course, Ahmadinejad still found ample time to attack the United States and Israel, which he refused to mention by name. Instead, he referred to Israel as “the Zionists.” At one point, he even had the audacity to refer to Israel as “uncivilized Zionists,” in reference to his claim that they resort to using military threats and actions against Iran to accomplish their goals.

    What about Iran? Last year, Iran threatened to block the Strait of Hormuz to achieve its goals. How does that not equate to being a military action?

    Ahmandinejad set out a list of hypothetical scenarios, including, “Imagine for a moment [how the world would be] had extremism or terrorism not been used to secure political goals.” How deceitful of him, considering that Iran’s Islamist dictatorship—the world’s foremost state sponsor of terrorism—has relied heavily on terrorism to seize power, attack foreign enemies, and repress domestic opposition.

    Just recently, it was reported that Iran had deployed members of its elite Quds force to help the oppressive Assad regime in Syria defeat the rebel opposition there. Given the fact that the Assad regime has a long record of exporting terrorism that is second only to Iran’s, Ahmandinejad would certainly have a difficult time explaining the weapons that his country is exporting to Syria to aid Assad’s forces.

    Ahmadinejad ended his speech on a bizarre note that was based in religious doctrine. After clarifying that he believed that U.S. leadership of the current world order was failing, he tried to illustrate a world that would need to come together and establish a new world order to survive.

    As usual, Ahmadinejad took jabs at the U.S. and Israel, except that this time, in his last U.N. speech as Iran’s president, he was much calmer and more subtle in his approach. While the tone of his message changed slightly, his mission remained the same: to spread hatred and mistrust of the U.S., Israel, and the entire current world system.

    Adam Gianella is currently a member of the Young Leaders Program at The Heritage Foundation. For more information on interning at Heritage, please visit: http://www.heritage.org/about/departments/ylp.cfm.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    One Response to Attempting to Decipher the Perplexing Rhetoric of Ahmadinejad's U.N. Speech

    1. Goodly Heritage says:

      Haven heard the prime minister of Israel's speech, I am of the believe that the world should brace up to call the bluff of Iranian president. The way to do this is left to them and it must be done as soon as possible to prevent this rouge state from enriching its uranium. Hitherto we have all been shying away from speaking the truth and it is high time we did this. If Iran and many Arab state have not seen the loss of human lives (incidentally their own kith and kin) in Syria up till now, then a proverb in my language is apt here — anyone who does not hesitate to march on his own dress will not mind tearing others. A new world order to him and his likes is a world dominated by Islamic extremism where every fundamental human rights like freedom o f speech, freedom of religion , women's right are anachronism.We don't want and pray for a world like this.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.