• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Obama Ducks Responsibility for Washington's Spending Binge

    In a recent “60 Minutes” interview, host Steve Kroft primed President Obama with this statement: “Most Americans think we’re spending too much money.”

    To which Obama uttered a contemplative “Mm-hm.”

    An understatement, indeed. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that federal spending will reach $3.56 trillion, or about 23 percent as a share of the economy, for fiscal year (FY) 2012—well above the historical average of 20.2 percent. That overspending, combined with temporarily low revenues as a result of the recession, has lead to consistent $1 trillion-plus deficits for the past four years.

    Did the President address the spending question? No. Instead, he waited for the next question about the national debt, which has increased 50 percent since he took office. Then came the familiar litany of why he’s not responsible for Washington’s overspending or the country’s abysmal fiscal situation:

    When I came into office, I inherited the biggest deficit in our history. And over the last four years, the deficit has gone up, but ninety percent of that is as a consequence of two wars that weren’t paid for, as a consequence of tax cuts that weren’t paid for, a prescription drug plan that was not paid for, and then the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.

    Hold on. In FY 2007, well into the wars, and after the tax cuts and the prescription drug plan were passed, the deficit was $160.7 billion. By FY 2008, it had reached $458.6 billion. The deficit was increasing as Obama came into office, mainly driven by the recession. But his Administration’s massive stimulus bill—“emergency actions” as he calls it—exacerbated matters by sending spending into overdrive and led to a $1.4 trillion deficit for FY 2009.

    And what good did these emergency actions do? Obama continues to embrace big government, tax hikes, and failed Keynesian stimulus spending policies—packaged as a “balanced approach”—while unemployment still sits above 8 percent and Taxmageddon’s threat suffocates job creation prospects.

    Obama also dusted off a claim that The Heritage Foundation and others have put to rest: that under his Administration, the federal government has grown “at a slower pace than at any time since Dwight Eisenhower.”

    That claim doesn’t account for the stimulus bill, which sent spending in 2009 to a record 25.2 percent of the economy. Total spending will slow in 2012 and over the next few years only because Republicans insisted on spending caps and cuts to accompany debt limit hikes in last year’s deal.

    Further, Obama continues to ignore the looming entitlement program crisis. The Administration’s hollow words about reform are dwarfed by its push for tax hikes on job creators, even though we have a spending problem, not a revenue problem. Without reforms, entitlement programs will push spending to untenable levels and put undue pressure on vital areas of government such as national defense.


    Mr. President, Americans have little patience for leaders who shirk responsibility and even less for those who fail to address the obvious—in this case, Washington’s spending addiction that is risking the American Dream for future generations. Yet, coming from a President who says not to worry right now about our $16 trillion debt, such inaction and abdication of responsibility come as no surprise.

    Posted in Economics [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Obama Ducks Responsibility for Washington's Spending Binge

    1. Emily Goff "We have a spending problem not a revenue problem" Look at your chart above and you can see we have both a spending and A REVENUE PROBLEM. Even Ryan's budget won't balance the budget for 30 years. Nice idea just cut our spending and we are OK but it is just not real, a dream. Our last balanced budget was before the Bush Tax Cuts. Politicians will not cut spending on their favored programs without some compromise from the other side. Everything, spending and revenue must be on the table, or we will be where we are now. Sequester and the fiscal cliff no way to Govern a Great nation. Congress must get real, make some deals for our Nation to move forward.

    2. Lloyd Scallan says:

      Emily, wake up! You're writing about Obama. Do you honestly expect him to accept responsibllity for anything. He even blamed Bush for "Fast and Furious" when that debacle was not even begun until Obama and Holder came up with yet another anti gun ploy.

    3. Bobbie says:

      obama won't face his truth or the reality he created. For every mistake in the past he uses the opportunity to hide his true and cruel intentions. he only attacks romney personally and all of the attacks are slander while he still keeps silent his own personal background. I pray people come to know the difference and that the peoples' deservedness is so much greater contrary than a mental abuser is promising them!

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×