• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Don't Play Politics with the Nation's Security

    The political grandstanding around sequestration is shameful. As Bob Woodward described in his book The Price of Politics, the present crisis was not the product of ineptitude or misplaced priorities (who would have thought those would be considered lesser evils?). It has been caused by the conscious decisions of political leaders who have put their election priorities ahead of their duties to provide national security.

    The sequestration formula mandated by the Budget Control Act has left us with the choice of a disastrous set of defense cuts (on top of those already instated) or accepting disastrous tax increases. This is a result of leaders who have stated that they are frankly comfortable with additional cuts to defense—as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) has said—and who desire massive increases in taxes to fund the unsustainable entitlement programs they heavily favor.

    Reid has repeatedly said he will allow no alternative solution to the sequestration to even come to a vote, unless it contains substantial tax hikes. Likewise, the President has said he would veto legislation that protected the defense budget from the nearly half a trillion dollars in cuts without opponents accepting his vision of the budget, which includes tax hikes.

    In the best of times, this would be considered an uncertain way forward. However, these are not the best of times. Even Administration officials have stopped saying that the war on terrorism is over and that we can reap a peace dividend similar to the Clinton years. The death of a U.S. ambassador and three of his colleagues last week made that tragically clear. America’s enemies are still out there and active. American leaders ignore these threats by shrinking our Armed Forces at our peril. We are only beginning to understand the ramifications of the upheaval in the Middle East after the Arab Spring, and al-Qaeda and Iran continue to bedevil the U.S and the free nations of the world.

    How would sequestration affect our defense and security efforts? The dangerous cuts to operational programs, negative effects on the defense industrial base, dwindling abilities to fund the National Guard during domestic disasters, and recently identified cuts to the security programs of our embassies abroad all cry out for a reasonable, bipartisan solution. Our leaders cannot stand on ideological positions, and, Majority Leader Reid, accepting only one option is the definition of being ideologically rigid.

    Everyone understands that politicians seek re-election, but their first duty must be to serve the people. Providing for the common defense is a paramount element of that service. Failing to deal appropriately with the self-destructive sequestration cuts is an abrogation of that responsibility.

    Posted in Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to Don't Play Politics with the Nation's Security

    1. @TopTheNews says:

      "Security" should be synonymous with defense. Alas, it is now part of the military industrial complex vernacular. There is a reason we have a military presence in over 150 countries, and it has nothing to do with our safety, or 'security' here at home…

    2. Luke says:

      Yeah well as we are taught in the Air Force the best Defense is a good offense to get rid of the enemy before it becomes to large and we end up with another "Hitler" or "Osama bin laden" people forget the reasons we are in multiple countries fighting for freedom. It is in the best interest of the United States and the rest of the world that we take out the extremist cultures or beliefs which smother any hope of freedom for their people before the extremists become too strong and it turns into another world War. Just look at the difference in death toll in modern Wars as apposed to wars of the past we have learned from history and will always have our forces spread out. The only problem now is that we are being thinned out to the point where we won't be able to function as efficiently and effectively…….

      • Charles says:

        Luke I agree that the best defense is a good offense. This reminds me, watching the end of our space shuttle is the end of our space program. Our government should understand that the country who controls the moon, controls the world. We should continue our space program.

    3. David Hicks says:

      The fact that the Senate has not done their job is a disgrace. No budget in over 3 years!. The american people have the way to fix the problem soon. Vote straight Republican and elect a few good men to the Senate. When Reed is not the majority leader any more, he will retire and slink out of town.

    4. Pingback: The Dire Effects of Sequestration

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×