• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Armed Services Committee to Question Administration on Sequestration Report

    This Thursday, the House Armed Services Committee (HASC) will hold a hearing on sequestration’s impact on defense and national security in light of the Sequestration Transparency Act Report, which the White House released on September 14. The report unfortunately brings very little insight to the impacts of sequestration on U.S. forces other than the expected exemption of Military Personnel accounts and that all sequesterable accounts will be reduced by 9.4 percent.

    The numbers that the Office of Management and Budget reported do not inform the general public of the cuts’ actual implications. They merely detail all the functions within each of the major accounts that compose federal spending. For instance, the Operation and Maintenance account of the U.S. Army will be reduced by nearly $7 billion, but we do not know what programs will be most severely affected.

    The report’s level of detail is only overwhelming by nature of its nearly 400 pages. In reality, it is a list of the names of the functions that exist in each of the accounts, accompanied by their top line budget authority and the dollar amount of the 9.4 percent reduction. HASC Members will likely question how this reduction will be more specifically executed, but they will also likely receive an insufficient response.

    The hearing will host Department of Defense Comptroller Robert Hale, accompanied by a deputy from each of the four service branches. They will hopefully provide more details of the impacts of the reductions in budget authority to the readiness of our Armed Forces. HASC and other authorities on defense have already reported extensively on the ways sequestration will inhibit America’s ability to execute national security strategy and uphold the country’s interests.

    The HASC report assessed that sequestration would lead to the smallest ground force since 1940, a fleet of fewer than 230 ships—the smallest level since 1915—and the smallest tactical fighter force in the history of the Air Force. HASC Members should raise these concerns in the hearing.

    The possible impacts of sequestration have been documented time, time and time again. It is imperative that Congress and the Administration stop using the readiness of our troops and the defense of the country as an excuse to increase taxes in an overburdened society. As clearly stated by Steve Bucci and Alison Fraser of The Heritage Foundation:

    Congress and the President should protect defense—this is not negotiable, despite the wishes of some on Capitol Hill, and it is not an ideological issue, as some have tried to portray it. Gambling with the readiness and security of America is not leadership; it is exactly the opposite.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    One Response to Armed Services Committee to Question Administration on Sequestration Report

    1. These cuts are as good as a serious act of treason against this Country . It is unacceptable. A blatant, brazen action proving where this "President" stands in his loyalty and dedication to protect America and the American people. (he doesn't stand for US, see the empty chair) It's good to know our enemies have as much information, if not more, than we do. This is the most transparently opaque administration… with the exception of the Usurper and his monster ego's impulsive drive to slap himself on the back and brag about "his" ( THE U.S. MILITARY'S) accomplishments for political gain, while subjecting our brave men and women to dangers because of sensitive information put our there for the huge foreign population who want to kill us to use in their plots against us. Sequestration in our Military is beyond abhorrent and should be punished by IMPEACHMENT at the very least.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.