• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Chicago Teachers' Strike Contradicts Principle of Public Service

    Students at Chicago schools are spending another day at home today, after a 700-page court filing against the Chicago Teachers Union (CTU) was sidelined for later consideration.

    Teachers walked off the job soon after the school year began, frustrating Mayor Rahm Emanuel (D) and thousands of Chicago parents.

    “This continued action by union leadership,” Mayor Emanuel said in a statement, “is illegal on two grounds. It is over issues that are deemed by state law to be non-strikable, and it endangers the health and safety of our children.”

    Not backing down, the CTU has released a statement saying that “this attempt to thwart our democratic process is consistent with Mayor Emanuel’s bullying behavior toward public school educators… the mayor, CEO Brizard and members of the board want to trample our collective bargaining rights and hinder our freedom of speech and right to protest.”

    Even if we can put aside gripes about the generous salary (at $76,000, it’s among the highest average in the nation) and extravagant benefits afforded to unionized Chicago teachers, a simple question remains: Why would public employees possess the same rights to “collective bargaining” that are possessed by workers in the private sector?

    One could simply turn to Calvin Coolidge for an answer:

    “There is no right,” he wrote in response to a strike by Boston Police, “to strike against the public safety by anybody, anywhere, any time.” Coolidge was then serving as the governor of Massachusetts, and his firm response to the strike helped him move on to the national stage.

    But what if we don’t buy the mayor’s argument that the CTU strike “endangers the health and safety” of Chicago children? Well, in that case, there was another rather important American who had some thoughts on the issue:

    “All Government employees should realize that the process of collective bargaining, as usually understood, cannot be transplanted into the public service… The employer is the whole people, who speak by means of laws enacted by their representatives in Congress.”

    That comes from none other than Franklin D. Roosevelt, in a 1937 letter to Luther Steward, President of the National Federation of Federal Employees.

    “Since their own services have to do with the functioning of the Government,” President Roosevelt wrote, “a strike of public employees manifests nothing less than an intent on their part to prevent or obstruct the operations of Government until their demands are satisfied. Such action, looking toward the paralysis of Government by those who have sworn to support it, is unthinkable and intolerable.”

    Teachers working in public schools are entrusted with the truly vital task of educating the next generation of entrepreneurs, statesmen, and yes, teachers. That they have chosen a life of public service is something to be admired. But the Chicago union is dishonoring the position with petty self-interest and theatrics.

    Presidents Coolidge and Roosevelt may have differed on a great many things, but both understood the seriousness and responsibility that comes with being a public servant. The Chicago Teachers Union’s shameless talk about “collective bargaining rights” or a “right to protest” does nothing but betray its own greed, and any sort of “win” will be nothing but an embarrassment to its members in the eyes of the nation.

    Posted in Education, First Principles [slideshow_deploy]

    One Response to Chicago Teachers' Strike Contradicts Principle of Public Service

    1. Bobbie says:

      And why unions are unfit in the government sector of public services! Government control can and does contradict anything in their way! If you don't like the government belittling job, make an honest living in the private sector! Government services, government benefits AND government costs should never supersede any benefits, pay or privileges the private market works to EARN!

      If Obama wants government "business" competing with the private sector, then people who want the same are accountable to it's costs. Competition is what the man wants then everyone is under the same rules that this man changes to appease some of his favorite select, at the dumping on others. Competition with government and private is a total oxy moron as government is authoritative over everyone. Like the big bad bully picking on someone half his size…

      Remove government from all government union backed services. The country doesn't need them and the people didn't ask for them.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.