• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • What's Driving High Poverty Numbers?

    Hundreds wait in line for section 8 housing vouchers in Bloomington, Indiana, in July. (Photo: Polaris)

    Today, the U.S. Census Bureau released its annual poverty numbers. It reports that 46.2 million Americans remain poor; the figure was unchanged from last year. The percentage of Americans who were poor remained at a near-record 15 percent.

    What we are sure to hear now is a cry from big-government advocates for increased government welfare spending.

    But record poverty is not the result of insufficient welfare spending. Last year, the government spent $927 billion on means-tested welfare aid, which breaks down to about $9,000 per lower-income person in the United States. The Census Bureau counts only about 3 percent of this as income when calculating poverty. This flawed measure is a crucial reason why poverty in the U.S. looks very different from the vision most people have of it.

    A more accurate way to think of the Census Bureau’s official poverty measure is as a report of “self-sufficiency”: the ability of Americans to sustain an income above poverty without reliance on welfare. The U.S. has record-high poverty (or rather, lack of self-sufficiency) in the short term because of bad policies that have damaged the economy and failed to create jobs. In the long term, the lack of self-sufficiency has been caused by a massive welfare state that discourages work and penalizes marriage.

    Welfare policies that support work have a track record of success. The welfare reform of 1996 inserted work requirements for able-bodied individuals into the largest cash-assistance government welfare program. As a result, stagnant welfare rolls began to decline and employment increased.

    However, the majority of the roughly 80 welfare programs funded by the government fail to include any type of work requirement. And in July, the Obama Administration issued a directive to gut the 1996 reform law of its work requirement. Taking work out of the equation is in direct contrast to what is necessary to assist those in need. Work requirements should be restored and expanded to other government welfare programs. Food stamps, one of the largest, would be a good place to start.

    Marriage is the nation’s greatest weapon against child poverty. As new data reveal, children born to single mothers are nearly six times as likely to be poor than their peers born to married parents. Today’s historically high rate of unwed childbearing—over 40 percent—does not bode well for the economic or overall well-being of children, families, and, ultimately, the nation.

    The majority of unwed births in the U.S. are not to teens, as generally thought, but to women in their 20s, and it is a result of the breakdown of marriage in lower-income communities. It is not because these young women (and men) are opposed to marriage, however. In fact, most unwed parents look favorably on the institution.

    Tragically, the critical facts about the importance of marriage are rarely if ever communicated to youth at risk for future non-marital births. Most welfare programs, in fact, include marriage penalties. If policies continue to take an indifferent or hostile approach to marriage, high levels of child poverty are bound to continue.

    More Americans in poverty—or rather, struggling to attain self-sufficiency—is not good news. Yet if we want to truly improve the lives of these individuals and families, rather than ignoring the causes of poverty, policies should address them. Promoting work and healthy marriages are the most important steps in combating poverty and helping the nation’s families to achieve self-sufficiency.

    Posted in Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to What's Driving High Poverty Numbers?

    1. Bobbie says:

      What's driving high poverty numbers? Unconstitutional, undisciplined, insubordinate, Government intervention and the unlimited expense to their cut everywhere government intervenes!!

    2. REM says:

      The persons in line look like they are starving !

    3. RennyG says:


    4. Ramarker says:

      Hear! Hear! Couldn't agree more with that last statement!

      I think this is everyone's objective. But how to do it? Generally, those who favor free enterprise argue that it creates more jobs. They are probably right, but many of the jobs created are not in the USA. It is right for capital to seek lowest costs for labor. It is also right for our government by the people and for the people to seek opportunities for its people. This often, but not always, puts the government's interests at odds with the capital interests. In articles like this one, I'd like to read about ideas that would align both the Monied interests with the American people's interests. Simply to free up the money will be, and has been, a boon for China and India, and a bane for American manufacturing. Imagine the Apple manufacturing complex that might exist in California if not for the Monied interest in maximum profit.

      As for marriage, it works better when the partners have greater access to jobs that pay living wages. It is more than coincidental that the decline in marriage has followed the decline in manufacturing jobs. First to lose their jobs were African-Americans and now the rest of the population are losing theirs. Women have been more adaptable to the change to the service economy and the matriarchal family structure already evident in the African-American communities is a harbinger of what is to come.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.