• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Coast Guard's Latest Battle: Underwater Drug Trafficking

    The U.S. Coast Guard is facing a growing threat in the Caribbean: undersea drug trafficking.

    The New York Times recently recounted an incident where the sea service interdicted an illegal semisubmersible vessel smuggling cocaine from Colombia. U.S. security forces have long combated smugglers bringing drugs and other contraband into the country via the Gulf; however, semisubmersible and fully submerged vessels are emerging as a preferred means of transportation for these shipments, as it improves the smugglers’ chances of going undetected.

    In the most recent run-in with these illegal vessels, the Coast Guard Cutter Mohawk utilized an interagency intelligence effort to locate the submersible and then pursued it with its deck-launched helicopter and fast boat. Though the smugglers were able to sink their vessel before the Coast Guard could salvage most of their cargo, this effort is considered a success both for the joint preparatory work performed in locating the smugglers and the proficiency the Mohawk crew showed in executing their interdiction mission.

    While the Coast Guard has successfully performed many similar operations, the sea service’s role in the Caribbean and elsewhere will be increasingly burdened by an aging and shrinking fleet. The Mohawk is the newest of the Famous-class medium endurance cutters, commissioned in 1991. Many in this class are reaching their 30-year service lives and will likely require extensions to fill mission gaps. According to the Government Accountability Office, the Coast Guard’s high and medium endurance cutters have been falling below performance expectations for a number of years. The bottom line is these vessels need replacement.

    Yet the Obama Administration is taking action to undermine this overhaul rather than accelerate it. The Offshore Patrol Cutter—the Coast Guard’s intended replacement for both the Famous fleet and the Reliance-class Medium Endurance Cutters—is currently in limbo due to recent budget uncertainty. The National Security Cutter, the replacement for the extremely old Hamilton-class High Endurance Cutter, will shrink to a fleet of just six vessels under the President’s Fiscal Year 2013 budget request, well below the original requirement of 16.

    These vessels patrol the Pacific and Arctic, not just the Caribbean and other coastal waters of the Continental United States. The Coast Guard’s fleet size is not keeping up with increased demand, and legacy vessels will continue to be overtaxed as a result.

    If Congress does not act to correct the chronic underfunding of the Coast Guard’s fleet revitalization, the sea service must continue to operate in aging craft. As they require increasing maintenance with age and mileage, these vessels will continue to incur greater costs for maintenance and repair, thus steering resources away from the more capable replacements that the Coast Guard needs. One can see the downward spiral this creates.

    While the Coast Guard continues to perform its missions admirably, they will find it increasingly difficult to keep up the pace with insufficient resources and equipment. Congress, in fulfilling its constitutional responsibility to provide for the common defense, should make a commitment to the Coast Guard to protect America’s seas and waterways.

    Posted in Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    8 Responses to Coast Guard's Latest Battle: Underwater Drug Trafficking

    1. Sean Killian says:

      Excellent article highlighting what we in the Coast Guard are facing. Semper Paratus!

    2. Brian says:

      Just a common sense type idea that will never go anywhere. why don.t they take a look at some of the mothballed fleet from navy and see what can be retrofitted at a fraction of the cost of new ships. i do think the CG should get what they need but I bet a dollar to a doughnut we have suitable ships sitting in storage that would be of great use.

    3. Leon Lundquist says:

      What part of Obama's duties does he not neglect? Has he done Anything in the U.S. National Interest or is it 100% in the Foreign Interest? Serious question.

    4. Fiedty says:

      The attitude of obama remains disgraceful when it comes to our Military. His only concern is for himself, the Military are considered his servants. Upkeep of equipment, cutters, tanks, whatever, is allowed to fail with the consequence being lost lives, thanks to improper maintenance, lack of funds for said upkeep. I reiterate; DISGRACEFUL!

    5. Sad too the demise of the American icebreaker fleet. Down to one, maybe two vessels? Maybe we can lease Russian and/or Swedish vessels on an as needs basis?

      Steven W Lindsey
      state rep
      Keene, NH

    6. American thinker says:

      Since Obama forgave $1billion in debt to the Egyptians and they are ordering submarines from Germany for $1billion maybe he could ask to borrow them? You know like a time share. Now that sounds "fair" since we essentially paid for them.

    7. historianMI says:

      Now just why would BHO not want an adequate number of Coast Guard vessels in the Caribbean? Keeping Colombian and other dope out of the U.S. should be a major interest by any administration. Certainly the costs of patrolling borders and sea lanes should be managed effectively using the most modern vessels and equipment. The costs of detecting and prosecuting smugglers and sellers are increased by ineffective patrolling. The costs of incarcerating criminals and attempting to rehabilitate the user/victims is a major expense to many states. This President seems to have a very odd set of priorities……..

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.