• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • President Obama, Chief Investor: Leave Energy Upgrades to the Businesses

    Reading President Obama’s latest Executive Order (EO) on industrial energy efficiency, one would think American companies were not interested in saving money and gaining a competitive advantage:

    While our manufacturing facilities have made progress in becoming more energy efficient over the past several decades, there is an opportunity to accelerate and expand these efforts with investments to reduce energy use through more efficient manufacturing processes and facilities and the expanded use of combined heat and power (CHP). Instead of burning fuel in an on site boiler to produce thermal energy and also purchasing electricity from the grid, a manufacturing facility can use a CHP system to provide both types of energy in one energy efficient step. Accelerating these investments in our Nations factories can improve the competitiveness of United States manufacturing, lower energy costs, free up future capital for businesses to invest, reduce air pollution, and create jobs.

    President Obama’s EO goes on to state that manufacturers are under-investing in energy efficiency and that public investment in efficiency upgrades will encourage private investment to capture this low-hanging fruit. While technological advancements do often improve efficiency, those investments should not be subsidized by the taxpayer, much less selected by Washington bureaucrats. Businesses and consumers will make these decisions, weighing preferences and considering trade-offs.

    When the federal government invests money to promote private-sector efficiency spending, these are likely investment businesses would have made regardless. Using taxpayer dollars merely offsets a part of that investment. And if a homeowner chooses not to invest in new window panes or a business executive does not buy a new boiler, he does not believe the benefits outweigh the costs. Or, families and businesses have monetary constraints and believe the money is better spent elsewhere.

    Businesses do not need public investment to improve efficiency and cut costs; they make those investments regularly with their own money for the very reasons stated in President Obama’s EO: to save money and improve their competitive advantage.

    If President Obama wants to help America gain a competitive advantage in manufacturing, he should work with Congress to open up federal lands and waters to oil and gas production. The amount of natural gas production in the U.S., occurring largely on private and state-owned lands, is making this country an attractive place to do business, especially for energy-intensive industries.

    In what could be a growing trend, Royal Dutch Shell recently announced plans to build a petrochemical plant in western Pennsylvania and cited the proximity to natural gas production as the reason for the location. The $2 billion plant will create 10,000 construction jobs and thousands of permanent jobs for Beaver County, Pennsylvania. A new KPMG analysis of the U.S. chemical industry emphasizes that “[w]ith a new and abundant source of low-cost feedstock, the US market has transformed to become one of the most advantageous markets for chemical production in the world.”

    President Obama can help American manufacturers without the help of the taxpayer. Opening access to America’s energy sources and prohibiting onerous and duplicative regulations will create jobs, grow our economy, lower energy prices and bring in much needed state and federal revenue.

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to President Obama, Chief Investor: Leave Energy Upgrades to the Businesses

    1. Tinker16 says:

      The article is right on! Enable industry to grow involves "getting federal government out of the way"! Publicized customer concerns and local government intervention will surely dictate favorable industrial responses!

    2. Bill Mullen says:

      Isn't this an example of micromanagement?

    3. Timothy Wood says:

      He wont because his mindset is destruction of our economy and total disruption of the American way.

    4. Guest says:

      This is just to try to find a way so that he can pass on Taxpayer money to his donors It ha s nothing to do with promoting energy efficiency

    5. Blair Franconia, NH says:

      That's the way it should be.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.