• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • CBO Appears Immune to Embarrassment

    The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) just released its latest concocted quarterly estimate on President Obama’s failed stimulus. CBO’s findings are as preposterous as its 11 previous studies of the stimulus, discussed here, here, and here.

    The story doesn’t change, because CBO’s faulty analysis doesn’t change. Each time CBO does an estimate, it is begging the question, because it is using the same models to evaluate the stimulus’s effectiveness as it did to predict how the stimulus would impact the economy before Congress passed it.

    These models assume that deficit spending is stimulative, so when CBO runs the models they find—you guessed it—that deficit spending is stimulative. All CBO has really shown is that they’ve run their models correctly.

    As we’ve written before, CBO’s method is akin to asserting that if you spun around in place 1,000 times really, really fast in the opposite direction to the earth’s rotation, the earth would actually reverse its spin. So you try it. You spin around 1,000 times. Then, having seen your performance, I announce emphatically that the earth is now in fact spinning in the opposite direction as it was. (Please ignore the fact that the sun continues to traverse the skies exactly as it has for billions of years.)

    In this latest report based on faulty reasoning, CBO found that in the second quarter of 2012, the stimulus:

    • Raised real (inflation-adjusted) gross domestic product (GDP) by between 0.1 percent and 0.8 percent;
    • Lowered the unemployment rate by between 0.1 percentage points and 0.6 percentage points;
    • Increased the number of people employed by between 0.2 million and 1.2 million; and
    • Increased the number of full-time-equivalent jobs by 0.2 million to 1.3 million. (Increases in full-time-equivalent jobs include shifts from part-time to full-time work or overtime and are thus generally larger than increases in the number of employed workers.)

    Really? It’s plain to every American—and especially the 12.8 million unemployed workers—that the stimulus failed. Yet CBO wants us to believe that it has had the beneficial impacts listed above.

    The assumption at the bottom of the CBO’s mistake is that deficit government spending stimulates demand, which stimulates the economy. To be sure, when government spends money, the money is spent, and when government gives money to others, they spend much or all of it. The recipients then have more to spend and they spend it, and on and on, producing the so-called multiplier.

    So far so good. But where did the money come from when not from tax revenues? Thin air? No. It came from borrowing, which means it subtracted from the pool of saving that individuals and businesses would otherwise have tapped to—wait for it—spend. And so government borrowing reduces private borrowing, which reduces private spending, which means less is received, which means less is spent, and on and on—the reverse multiplier.

    The flaw in the Keynesian approach at the heart of the CBO model is embodied in this simple equation: 1 – 1 = 0. A dollar of deficit spending (and its multiplier) is offset by the dollar borrowed (and its multiplier), leaving a net of zero effect.

    You would think by this point CBO would be embarrassed enough to come up with a more defensible way to evaluate the stimulus. But CBO appears immune to embarrassment. CBO should drop its faulty methods suggesting the stimulus succeeded when the American people can see with their own eyes that the stimulus failed.

    Posted in Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    11 Responses to CBO Appears Immune to Embarrassment

    1. Bobbie says:

      The stimulus didn't fulfill it's intent or there wouldn't be government time and tax payers money considering another one. This is beneath the American people. If the CBO is immune to embarrassment, how long before we can stop humoring them? The government proves unable to fulfill the responsibilities the government decided to take the liberty away from the private sector. Limit government. Their abuse of America is with great insult and humiliation…

    2. Pragmatic says:

      "A dollar of deficit spending (and its multiplier) is offset by the dollar borrowed (and its multiplier), leaving a net of zero effect."

      This is of course assuming that the multipliers are equal. You show no evidence of this.

      • Nybbler says:

        the only way the multipliers wouldn't be equal, when a dollar is taken and repurposed for stimulus, is if a borrowed dollar isn't worth a deficit dollar. In fact when government takes money to spend on stimulus it requires additional monies for administration which would seem to indicate a somewhat negative effect to the multiplier. (Unless, of course, there's some magic that happens when government spends a dollar to magnify it's value).

    3. tarsis says:

      A lie, is a lie, is a lie

    4. Blair Franconia, NH says:

      The CBO was wrong about Obamacare.

    5. Todd Caswell says:

      Read the whole article, then you'll see why we haven't moved forward in 4 years..

    6. Tom Sullivan says:

      Our government is bailing water from one end of the pool to the other. It is economic idiocy.

    7. Mike, Wichita Falls says:

      The CBO is like a computer…it only does what it is told to do. We really should not fault them but Congress for they give them the assumptions under which to score bills, programs, etc.

      While the statists love to scoff at the failure of "tax cuts for the rich" to stimulate the economy, they continue to religiously advance the notion that spending by the very richest entity, the government, will do the same. While the former is tried and true, the latter is an utter failure as we have witnessed these last 3-4 years.

    8. CforUS says:

      Are the same auditors and statisticians calculating global warming statistics?

      • Defender of the CBO says:

        Of course not. The CBO is non-partisan and non-biased. They are just required by law to use the assumptions the politicians tell them to. (Garbage in, garbage out.)

        The global warming statistics are calculated by a bunch of radical environmentalists. (Data in, slanted politicized garbage out.)

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×