• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • The End of the U.N.'s Arms Trade Treaty—for Now

    On Friday, the negotiating conference for the U.N.’s Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) crashed to short-term failure. After four weeks, the clock ran out.

    The ATT was an effort to strike a deal between the Europeans and the Americans—who hoped (wrongly) that a treaty would force inept and dictatorial states to clean up their acts—and the rest of the world’s nations, who wanted an ATT that officially recognized their right to buy and sell arms, clamped down on the rebels troubling them, or merely offered another avenue to request foreign aid. Ultimately, while the political push behind the ATT was strong, it was not strong enough to get this bad deal done before the clock struck midnight.

    Predictably, the treaty’s supporters are already blaming the U.S. for their temporary failure, despite the fact that no U.S. Administration is likely to be friendlier to the ATT than the Obama Administration. The conference did unravel on the final Friday after the U.S. stated that time had run out, but it was not the U.S. that stopped the ATT. It was reality. After the U.S. spoke, a number of other nations followed, all agreeing with the U.S. As is too often the case, the U.S. took a reasonable stand and the rest of the world either hid behind it or grandstanded against it.

    After spending the better part of thee weeks at the U.N. watching the negotiations, I have four concluding thoughts about it:

    1. The U.S. is an exceptional country. Above all, it’s because of our Constitution, the universal rights it protects, and the federal system it embodies. Among other things, it means that treaties that pose no problems for others do cause problems—including Second Amendment problems—for us.
    2. The U.S. was ably represented at the conference, with a negotiating team led by Assistant Secretary of State Tom Countryman. Their statements were clear, and they were available to answer questions and listen to suggestions. Disagreements on substance should not blind us to the professionalism displayed by the U.S. delegation.
    3. The U.S. Congress—led by Senator Jerry Moran (R–KS), who released a bipartisan letter signed by 50 of his colleagues on the ATT and the Second Amendment on Thursday, and Representative Mike Kelly (R–PA), who on July 2 sent a letter expressing a wide variety of concerns with the ATT signed by 130 of his colleagues to President Obama—played a constructive role in the process. The second draft of the ATT was still fundamentally flawed, but on Second Amendment and sovereignty grounds it was better than the first draft—in part because of the concerns expressed by Congress.
    4. When the U.N. General Assembly meets in September, it could renew the negotiating mandate for the ATT (as the Obama Administration wants), which would mean a new conference, working on a consensus basis, in 2013. Or the it could adopt the current treaty draft and declare it open for signature. Thus, the ATT might become reality as early as October.

    In other words, this is not the end of the process. It is the end of a phase. No one who was concerned about the ATT should be under any illusions that this is more than a tactical defeat for the treaty—or the U.N.’s broader program, of which the ATT is only a part.

    Posted in Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to The End of the U.N.'s Arms Trade Treaty—for Now

    1. aaron Condonmanish says:

      No chance of getting 67 votes even in the libtard controlled Congress, that would result in a sweep of local, state and national offices in the US by the Republicans, it would take more than a decade for Dems to recover from the ads claiming that Dems are trying to sell our sovereignty to our enemy's. It would be worse than 2010.

    2. Lloyd Scallan says:

      How many more times must we be reminded that the freedom to own a firearm is the very first freedom any dictator must take from the people to insure the final collapse of that nation? Make no mistake, communist are hell-bent to end the sovereignty of this nation. They have the final pieces in place in Washington, so we must realize they will not stop.

    3. Charles Webb says:

      We must get out of the U.N.. What good are they? They would be out of business if our tax monies did not support them. This ATT business will be paid for, and controlled by the United States. The U.S will do all the training. This treaty serves no purpose except to disarm our own citizens. It was not passed this time, but it will pass,. and subject our Country to the ATT. There will be another end run around Congress. If obama and hillllery pull this off (remember obama care) and destroy our 2nd Amendment, then there will be some real battles when they try to take our guns.

      I do apologize for my ranting. I just remember the first thing Hitler did was to collect all civilian arms. An unarmed society is easier to control. Please join The National Rifle Association and National Association for Gun Rights. They will tell you the truth and keep you up to date on the U.N.ATT. Thanks

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.