• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • New Regulations Equal New Crimes: Congress’s Overreliance on Criminal Statutes as Regulatory Tools

    There is currently a bill before the Senate to establish a Concrete Masonry Products Board, the purpose of which is to “carry out a coordinated program of research, education, and promotion to improve, maintain, and develop markets for concrete masonry products.”

    The fact that the government feels the need to regulate this industry at the expense of the taxpayers is, in itself, troubling. What is even more worrisome is that the government feels the need to regulate the concrete industry through criminal enforcement.

    This new bill would make it a federal offense, punishable by a $5,000 fine and up to one year in prison, for members or agents of this proposed board to share information that they receive with non-board members. This is just another misuse of the criminal law as a regulatory tool.

    The government routinely relies on criminal statutes as regulatory tools, resulting in a labyrinth of more than 4,000 federal criminal laws. Here is another one to add to the pile. It seems that every time Congress faces a problem, its immediate reaction is to create a new crime.

    This time the crime is sharing information about concrete. Let’s add that to the list of other heinous federal crimes, including shipping lobsters in plastic instead of cardboard boxes and mistakenly using the wrong type of label to ship chemicals used for scientific research.

    That conduct may be wrongdoing (and worse, in some cases it really isn’t or shouldn’t be considered such), but it does not warrant the creation of new criminal statutes that include jail time. They are problems that can and should be resolved with civil penalties, not a career-ruining criminal record.

    The one year’s imprisonment would make the crime just a misdemeanor. Why just a misdemeanor? Maybe it is because no one will think that Congress is serious if the only penalty is a fine. Maybe Congress wants a federal law enforcement agency (presumably the FBI) to be able to investigate violations of this law. Maybe it’s just force of habit.

    Whatever the reason, if a punishment is necessary at all—the better solution is to not have superfluous boards regulating private industries—then a civil fine should be more than sufficient. Impose treble damages if you like. That should provide ample deterrent. And if Congress wants the FBI to be able to investigate violations of this law, then amend the statutes granting the FBI investigatory authority so that they can question everyone involved. That should be sufficient.

    We don’t need to resort to grand jury subpoenas and search warrants (wiretaps will be next), to say nothing of jail time, to deal with these miscreants.

    Gavriel Swerling is currently a member of the Young Leaders Program at The Heritage Foundation. For more information on interning at Heritage, please visit http://www.heritage.org/about/departments/ylp.cfm.

    Posted in Legal [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to New Regulations Equal New Crimes: Congress’s Overreliance on Criminal Statutes as Regulatory Tools

    1. Bobbie says:

      Intentional confusion. Make work! Incriminate what the government can at someone's loss and you have government corrupt MAKE WORK!

    2. KJinAZ says:

      This is nothing more than another special interest giveaway. We MUST end all of the special interest groups….period. if your business can't stand without government help, then we don't need or want it.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.