- The Foundry: Conservative Policy News from The Heritage Foundation - http://blog.heritage.org -

Great Green Fleece: Air Force Spends $59 Per Gallon for Biofuel

Posted By Michael Sandoval On July 23, 2012 @ 3:35 pm In Featured,Scribe | Comments Disabled

[1]

The U.S. Air Force spent $59 per gallon on biofuels for a demonstration last month intended to show the promise of the alternative energy source. That’s more than double [2] what the U.S. Navy spent as part of its so-called Great Green Fleet demonstration.

The total cost for the 11,000 gallons of synthetic jet fuel from Gevo Inc., a Colorado-based company, amounts to $639,000.

For its demonstration, Navy officials spent $12 million on 450,000 gallons of fuel, or approximately $26 a gallon. Combining the fuel with petroleum in a 50-50 mixture [3] reduces the cost per gallon to around $15, more than four times the cost of petroleum alone. The company providing the Navy’s biofuel, Solazyme, was a recipient of stimulus grant funding [4].

The report from Reuters also indicated that among Gevo’s financial backers is Vinod Khosla, a venture capitalist whose firm owns 27 percent of the company. Reuters noted that Khosla has donated overwhelmingly to Democratic candidates [2] in recent elections.

Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus has repeatedly touted the benefits of expanding the Navy’s use of alternative fuel sources such as biofuels.

“It was worthwhile to show that biofuels can compete and can be used in every single thing that we do in the Navy. Everything before now has been a test. This shows that we can use biofuels and other alternative energies in an operational manner,” said Mabus in a conference call [3] following the Naval exercise’s conclusion.

Mabus and other Defense Department officials have cited increases in petroleum prices [5] as the reason for exploring biofuel integration, which drew criticism from Republican officials.

“You are not the secretary of energy, you are the secretary of the Navy,” said Rep. Randy Forbes (R-VA). Forbes says he supports green energy, but facing budget priorities, finds the expenses inappropriate.

The test of Gevo biofuels occurred in late June in Florida.

Gevo’s president praised the opportunity to test the company’s product.

“This is a great accomplishment for the USAF, Gevo and the biofuels industry. We’ve validated that ATJ from isobutanol is a clean burning, homegrown, drop-in jet fuel,” said Chris Ryan in a statement [6].

Ryan hopes that the Air Force demonstration “has taken the industry one step closer to full commercialization. We remain committed to commercialization and believe we have the most economic route to deliver aviation biofuels at scale.”

How the company will reach commercialization and scale production to levels necessary to meet purchase demands from the Department of Defense relies on the future construction of a commercial-scale refinery. Currently, the company produces only 7,500 to 8,000 gallons of biofuel per month. The Air Force’s purchase represents more than a month’s worth of production.

The Pentagon issued a report in 2011 [7], “Opportunities for DoD use of Alternative and Renewable Fuels,” which highlights the expected production gap between departmental demand and the projected supply of the so-called “drop-in” fuels by 2020. That gap exceeds 450 million gallons between expected demand and the highest production estimate available.

Even should economies of scale and commercial-size refining capabilities be attained, the Pentagon still expects to pay a $2.2 billion premium on annual fuel costs by 2020. Per gallon premiums are estimated to be between $1.43 and $5.24 by 2015. The premium represents a 10 percent to 15 percent increase over currently-used “conventional petroleum fuels,” according to the report.

Wired highlighted [8] the gap between projected demand and potential deliverables within the biofuels sector, and with expectations that costs would eventually reach competitive levels with petroleum-only sources.

Repeated attempts to clarify the assumptions made by Mabus and other Pentagon officials have not been forthcoming, even to members of Congress or the Congressional Research Service:

“One of Washington’s most influential naval analysts was equally flummoxed. “What is the Navy’s specific projection for how quickly prices for advanced biofuels will drop to levels competitive with those for petroleum-based fuels?” Ronald O’Rourke and his colleagues at the Congressional Research Service ask in a June 2012 report on military energy initiatives [9] (.pdf). ”What studies did the Navy or DOD [Department of Defense] conduct to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of developing a domestic advanced biofuels industry?”

Apparently, no one at the Navy could be bothered to tell him the answer – if an answer existed, that is.”


Article printed from The Foundry: Conservative Policy News from The Heritage Foundation: http://blog.heritage.org

URL to article: http://blog.heritage.org/2012/07/23/great-green-fleece-air-force-spends-59-per-gallon-for-biofuel/

URLs in this post:

[1] Image: http://blog.heritage.org/wp-content/uploads/7605056874_5bccc58b57_z.jpg

[2] more than double: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/07/15/us-usa-military-biofuels-idUSBRE86E01N20120715

[3] 50-50 mixture: http://fuelfix.com/blog/2012/07/20/administration-touts-great-green-fleet-test-exercises-with-biofuels/

[4] stimulus grant funding: http://blog.heritage.org/2011/12/13/navy-buys-biofuels-for-15-per-gallon-from-stimulus-linked-firm/

[5] increases in petroleum prices: http://www.stripes.com/news/navy/mabus-congress-hasn-t-derailed-navy-s-plan-to-increase-use-of-biofuels-1.183064

[6] in a statement: http://www.bizjournals.com/denver/news/2012/07/03/air-force-tests-jet-using-gevo-biofuel.html

[7] Pentagon issued a report in 2011: http://energy.defense.gov/NDAA_FY10_Sec_334_Report_FINAL_85B3.pdf

[8] Wired highlighted: http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/07/green-fleet/all/

[9] June 2012 report on military energy initiatives: http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/dangerroom/2012/07/R42558.pdf

Copyright © 2011 The Heritage Foundation. All rights reserved.