• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • U.S. Nuclear Triad Essential for National Security

    General Robert Kehler, the current commander of the Strategic Command, offered only tepid support for the existing U.S. nuclear triad during a July 12 speech on Capitol Hill.

    General Kehler said that the traditional U.S. nuclear triad—comprised of intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs), and strategic bomber aircraft—remains “the best arrangement that we have today.” Strategic Command would, according to General Kehler, consider eliminating this structure if the President’s requirements change.

    While it is entirely appropriate for a senior military commander to follow the policies of the President, this approach is wrongheaded for policymakers. The triad continues to serve vital security interests, and its maintenance should be derived from a sound evaluation of the strategic environment.

    Kehler’s speech also serves as another reminder of the dangers inherent in the “nuclear zero” policy, which envisions a world without nuclear weapons. It is a guiding philosophy of the Obama Administration, and it should be changed.

    The “nuclear zero” concept undermines world stability and security for at least one very fundamental reason: It assumes that U.S. nuclear weapons reductions will generate goodwill on behalf of our adversaries. Nothing could be further from the truth. Countries pursue nuclear weapons programs because of their own perceptions of security, and that is not directly related to the numbers of U.S. nuclear weapons. In addition, nuclear weapons have deterred conflict between major world powers since they were created.

    The nuclear triad remains essential for preserving U.S. national security and that of its allies. Each of the three components has complementary strengths that offer the most credible strategic deterrent force. In 2030, when the U.S. plans to start replacing its systems, it will have 60-year-old ICBMs, 40-year-old SLBMs, and 35- to 70-year-old bombers. The current Administration has thus far only demonstrated its willingness to pledge to pursue those efforts—with numerous strings attached.

    The current fiscal environment means that only dedicated political leadership from the White House will result in the funding necessary to accomplish the needed modernization, despite nuclear weapons presenting only a minor investment in the context of the federal budget.

    Eliminating “legs” of the nuclear triad would result in the U.S. falling short in preserving national security, fulfilling its nuclear deterrent guarantees to allies, and helping to preserve international stability. Instead, the U.S. should commit the resources necessary to modernize the nuclear triad and revitalize its nuclear weapons complex.

    The overall objective that the Obama Administration should pursue is to calibrate national defenses according to the nature of the strategic environment and in light of existing and emerging threats—not solely budget pressures or arbitrarily determined political goals.

    Bryan DeWinter is currently a member of the Young Leaders Program at The Heritage Foundation. For more information on interning at Heritage, please visit http://www.heritage.org/about/departments/ylp.cfm.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    One Response to U.S. Nuclear Triad Essential for National Security

    1. Jon says:

      Global Zero is a pipe dream. I don't want to see the US ever give up nuclear weapons. I think we need to maintain an arsenal of at least 3,500 warheads. Though under our current budget constraints I do believe we can field a strong deterrent with fewer delivery vehicles.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×