• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Thanks to the American People for Resisting the Law of the Sea Treaty

    The Heritage Foundation and Heritage Action for America have fought steadily for American sovereignty and American naval and maritime rights and against taxation of Americans by international organizations and giveaways of America’s resources to foreign countries. As an important part of that effort, Heritage has opposed ratification by the United States of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, better known as the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST). The American people have responded to the educational efforts of Heritage and other institutions concerned about America’s interests in the world and have made clear that the U.S. Senate should not approve LOST.

    Heritage’s Bernard and Barbara Lomas Senior Research Fellow Steven Groves has made clear in a series of key reports why America must not join the treaty:

    The testimony of Mr. Groves and the testimony of former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on June 14, 2012, ensured that the Senate understood the dangers that LOST poses to American interests.

    The Senate received the message, loud and clear.

    The Treaty Clause of the U.S. Constitution provides that the President “shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur.” Absent the consent of two-thirds of the Senators present, the President cannot make a treaty with foreign powers. As a matter of simple math, assuming that all 100 U.S. Senators are present and voting on a treaty, 67 Senators must approve for the Senate to consent to the treaty—which means that 34 votes in opposition to the treaty can stop it.

    Having heard the voices of Heritage members and others concerned about the dangers of the LOST treaty, 34 Senators went on record opposing LOST. Thirty-one Senators, led by Senators Jim DeMint (R-SC), Jim Inhofe (R-OK), and Mike Lee (R-UT), signed a letter to the Senate majority leader opposing the treaty, Senators Rob Portman (R-OH) and Kelly Ayotte (R-NH) wrote a separate letter to the majority leader to oppose it, and Senator Johnny Isakson (R-GA) sent a further letter opposing it to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman. The clear voices of these 34 Senators in opposition to the Law of the Sea Treaty protected America’s sovereignty and interests in the seas.

    The Heritage battle to protect America from the Law of the Sea Treaty will continue until a President, now or in the future, withdraws the ill-advised treaty, but, at least for now, LOST has been stopped dead in its tracks. As for the right of America’s naval and commercial fleets to sail the seas in accordance with the longstanding practices and customs of nations, often called “customary international law,” that right depends for its vitality not on paper treaties signed at the United Nations, but rather on the might of the United States Navy. Americans who seek to preserve and advance the rights of Americans to use the seas should support a strong national defense, including a strong Navy that can project American power across the globe in defense of American interests.

    We thank the American people for protecting the interests of America by stopping the Law of the Sea Treaty.

    Posted in Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to Thanks to the American People for Resisting the Law of the Sea Treaty

    1. JWM says:

      This post ends with the phrase, "…a strong Navy that can project American power across the globe…" Originally America's navy was intended to protect American shipping on the seas, although occasionally to do that it had to attack shore installations, as with the Barbarry pirates. But that purpose changed, probably in WW II when our battleship fleet was destroyed and we transformed into a carrier-based navy. I wonder if America wouldn't be better off, and engage in fewer wars, if we were to return to the Navy's original purpose.

    2. Lloyd Scallan says:

      Thanks to HF and other conservative outlets that gave us the direction and information to oppose LOST.
      But once again, we must realize the fact that every Democrat, and several Republicans, supported LOST. It is not enough to just understand how destructive a certain bill can be to our freedoms and sovereignty, but we must recognize those in Congress that would agree and support the destroyers.

    3. Andrew says:

      Ten bucks says "the American people" don't know — or care — about the treaty. Polls say they are more concerned with jobs, the economy and trying to stay afloat in this economy. The people you should really thank are your fellow conservative activists.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×