• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • State Department Still Balking on Calling Out Terrorists in Nigeria

    There is some confusion in Foggy Bottom as to how the United States ought to define Boko Haram, an Islamic militant group based in northern Nigeria.

    Last week, Assistant Secretary of State Johnnie Carson testified in front of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, calling Boko Haram a “terrorist organization.” Yet he defended the Obama Administration’s position that Boko Haram should not be officially designated a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO).

    Emphasizing that the Nigerian government’s failure to provide adequate services, expand the economy to the north, and reduce unemployment has led to Boko Haram’s growth, Carson overlooked the core objectives of the group. That is, Boko Haram seeks to dispense with the current government, which it views as illegitimate, and establish an Islamic state in its place.

    To be fair, Carson has a point when he argues that (largely Muslim) northern Nigerians are far less well off than their Christian neighbors to the south. Nigeria’s federal government has failed to address local grievances, and it has overlooked dire development conditions. This is nothing new, but it has played well into Boko Haram’s narrative that the federal government is the cause of their plight. This message is a useful recruiting tool and builds public support for the group.

    Socio-economic grievances are certainly part of the problem, but they don’t explain the full picture. The Obama Administration has repeatedly downplayed the religious underpinnings that drive Boko Haram’s ideology. Boko Haram’s targets are primarily against the government and the Christian community, though Muslims who have spoken out against Boko Haram have also been victims. Despite the group’s near-daily attacks against innocent civilians, do they amount to qualifying it as an FTO?

    According to U.S. law, Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act outline the following criteria for FTO designation:

    • The organization is a foreign organization;
    • The organization engages in terrorist activity or terrorism or retains the capability and intent to engage in terrorist activity or terrorism; and
    • The terrorist activity or terrorism of the organization threatens the security of United States nationals or the national security of the United States.

    The first two are no-brainers, and the third has been supported repeatedly by the U.S. Justice Department, head of U.S. Africa Command General Carter Ham, and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper. (See Heritage analysis here, here and here.)

    Yet despite the group’s fitting such qualifications, State still lacks clarity in defining Boko Haram.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    One Response to State Department Still Balking on Calling Out Terrorists in Nigeria

    1. Bobbie says:

      State department still balking on calling out terrorists in Nigeria? Takes one to ignore one!

      It's just deeply disheartening that people haven't established human value at this time in the world and since the beginning of time take it out on the lives of others. Why are people allowed to teach hatred to a point all are unable to think for themselves to hear the lies they're taught??

      Faith is personal and isn't a target for anyone's attack. It's nobody's business but anybody's interested. Christians do not pose a threat in words or actions so why assume and kill?

      It's how people carry themselves individually that earns respect and shows who people are. why the terroristic arrogance not to give your own lives and people a chance? I can understand the resentment of government control over ones own and the reason caused to have to defend yourself but stop the killing of who you've been taught to kill. Open your minds ability to think further than those narrowing your minds. Rise above the government of people not with weapons but words!
      What exactly have you become if not terrorists?

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.