• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • A "Conservative Carbon Tax" Is $0

    Instead of rallying together to fight the Obama Administration’s backdoor environmental regulations, which have exorbitant costs and minimal benefit, some conservative organizations are working with liberal groups to push costs higher by piling on a carbon tax. This would be nothing more than an enormously high, regressive energy tax that would needlessly destroy jobs and economic growth.

    The abundance of shale gas and the potential for stably low natural gas prices have energy-intensive industries champing at the bit to come to the United States. The combination of onerous, duplicative regulations and a carbon tax would reverse that immediately. And all for no noticeable change in the earth’s temperature.

    Since an overwhelming majority of our energy needs are met by fossil fuels, these rules directly raise the cost of electricity, gasoline, diesel fuel, and home heating oil. Since low-income families spend more of their budgets on energy, a tax that increases energy prices would disproportionately eat into the income of the poorest American families.

    As Congress of Racial Equality chairman Roy Innis says, “The civil rights challenge of our time is to stop extreme environmental policies that drive up the cost of energy and disproportionately hurt low income Americans and the working poor.” The higher energy costs of a carbon tax would dwarf any type of rebate low-income families would allegedly receive.

    But the pain doesn’t stop there. Businesses, faced with higher energy costs, would pass those costs on to consumers. However, if a company has to absorb the costs, high energy costs squeeze profit margins and prevent businesses from investing and expanding.

    The energy-intensive manufacturing industry would be hit particularly hard. Economists in The Heritage Foundation’s Center for Data Analysis estimate that manufacturing jobs would have fallen dramatically under a cap-and-trade scheme. A carbon tax would do the same. Some companies would disappear completely. Others would go overseas to countries that choose not to implement a carbon-reduction scheme, where the cost of production would be much cheaper.

    Further, a carbon tax would do almost nothing to impact global temperatures. The developing world is still very much in development. Carbon dioxide emissions from China and India are rapidly increasing as they continue to expand their economies, and they have no intention of scaling back economic growth to curb emissions.

    Even if the U.S. were to curb carbon emissions 83 percent below 2005 levels by 2050 (what cap-and-trade bills called for), it would constitute a very, very small portion of emissions worldwide and reduce global temperatures by a few tenths of a degree Celsius by the close of the century.

    A carbon tax is not a conservative, free-market policy, and the thought that it could make it through the halls of Congress and through lobbytown to be revenue neutral is laughable. Conservatives should be working to fight the egregious regulations that drive up energy costs—not piling on policies that will drive them up further.

    Posted in Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to A "Conservative Carbon Tax" Is $0

    1. Pigou says:

      Lots of assumptions. Lots of adjectives. Not many numbers. Not many meaningful propositions. Not much thought.

      You're…not very good at this.

    2. Bobbie says:

      Results are speculative. What regarding the weather is accurate? The world could disintegrate tomorrow. Man didn't create the earth, therefore what he finds out isn't for certain and the ill minded with authority easily manipulates the situation.

      For man who continues to blow up the earth intentionally to think his behavior changes the course of nature is absolutely ignorant. To put a result on something this speculative with lots of money, rules, regulations, power and control that doesn't back up the claim attached when tomorrow's weather is an educated guess, says it's an agenda of great absurdities. Quit the scare tactics, money schemes and financial abuses. If there is anything government should do is govern so we are able to govern our own which is freedom and the government budget is as little as outside government is needed! And government wages can be determined by freedoms worth not government controlled corruptibility exploiting advantage of America. The world deserves the American way intended and under proper constitutional governing, as people around the world immigrate here. Get the carbon clowning out!

    3. Nicolas Loris Nicolas Loris says:

      Clink on the links and you'll get some numbers. My proposition is not enact a carbon tax.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×