• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • VIDEO: ObamaCare and the Future of Political Speech at The Blogger Briefing

    The Supreme Court’s landmark—and controversial—ruling on President Barack Obama’s signature health care legislation last week has expectedly stirred passions and inspired widely varying opinions concerning the court’s 5-4 decision to uphold the Affordable Care Act’s core mandates.

    Heritage’s Robert Alt and Nina Owcharenko offered their take on the Foundry last Thursday, arguing for a full repeal:

    The Supreme Court’s decision to uphold Obamacare reflects a tragic misreading of the law, one which could cost us not just economically but also in terms of liberty. On the bright side, the Court recognized that there are limits to what Congress may do under the Commerce Clause.  But this was the silver-lining of a dark cloud.  The Court then fundamentally misreads ObamaCare, contorting to find another authority—the power to tax—for Congress to enact the law.

    The effects of the decision will be felt far beyond ObamaCare.  By allowing government to require Americans to buy a product or service at the federal government’s direction, the Court has seriously damaged the principle of limited government. The decision announced today could open the door to even more dictates from Washington for generations to come.  Indeed, anyone who has any doubts about this need only read the Court’s suggestion that Congress could force Americans to buy energy efficient windows or pay a tax.

    Alt, along with Owcharenko, will expand on their call for repeal of the ACA decision at The Blogger’s Briefing on Tuesday at noon ET. Watch it live on The Foundry.

    Alt is a Director of the Rule of Law Programs and a Senior Legal Fellow at The Heritage Foundation and an expert in constitutional law. Owcharenko is the Director of the Center for Health Policy Studies and is an expert in health care policy.

    The Bloggers Briefing will also be joined by former SEC Commissioner Paul Atkins and Curt Levey, president of the Committee for Justice, to discuss the threats to public companies’ involvement in public policy formation and the future of political speech after Citizens United.

    Atkins details the efforts of the left to silence public companies through pressure campaigns like those observed in the attacks against the American Legislative Exchange Council this year.

    Using the channel of annual shareholder meetings and proxy voting, social activists, unions, and other powerful groups have sought to force “increased disclosure” or otherwise prohibit any corporate involvement in public policy initiatives.

    According to Atkins, at least 100 corporations have found themselves a target of such proposals, driven in large part by groups like Common Cause, AFL-CIO, SEIU, and others. Some have labeled the tactic “name and shame.”

    Levey points to outright intimidation and the use of government force by groups interested only in shutting down their opposition. Levey cites three of the most prominent methods used recently against conservative and free market organizations—“lawfare,” bureaucratic harassment through repeated complaint filings with government agencies, and the criminal and potentially deadly practice of “SWAT-ting.”

    Posted in Ongoing Priorities, Scribe [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to VIDEO: ObamaCare and the Future of Political Speech at The Blogger Briefing

    1. Lisa Hawkins says:

      Couldn't make it into the District this afternoon and thought I'd catch this on Livestream. No Luck – it didn't stream. So I hope that Heritage posts today's urgent Blogger's Briefing ("ObamaCare") ASAP!! Thank You! – Lisa, Heritage Member

    2. Bobbie says:

      and why? Because 300 million people pay their own way that an imaginary number of people are protected from! the rules and regulations are outrageous and serves no purpose but government! Political speech/correctness? Only reveals human weakness!! The political correct class isn't tolerable of commonsense and doesn't want it learned by happenstance the way everyone else does so they suggest their protecting people? what they're doing is keeping people from learning on their own to develop the ability to form their own personal opinions the way the individual mind builds knowledge!! Close our mouths and kill our minds the "democratic government politically correct" way.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.