• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Religious Liberty Victory for NYC Churches

    On Friday, a district court issued a permanent injunction against New York City’s ban on the use of the schools for worship services, permitting city churches to continue renting space in public schools on weekends.

    “Churches that have been helping communities for years can continue to offer the hope that empty buildings can’t,” explained Alliance Defense Fund senior counsel Jordan Lorence, who has been litigating the case. “The court’s order allows churches and other religious groups to meet for worship services in empty school buildings on weekend on the same terms as other groups.”

    City officials and the New York City Board of Education, which first proposed the ban, have defended the policy by claiming that allowing religious services to be held in vacant public school facilities constitutes an inappropriate government endorsement of religion.

    The Bronx Household of Faith, a small Christian congregation in the city, has led the 17-year legal battle over the ban’s apparent infringement on religious freedom, arguing that the rule violates the freedom of churches to express their beliefs in a public space.

    As Lorence explained earlier in the case: “Churches and other religious groups should be able to meet in public buildings on the same terms as other community groups. They should not be excluded simply because of the religious nature of their speech.”

    The city-wide ban on using public school facilities for religious services led to the eviction of over 60 churches across New York City in January of this year, forcing many congregations to look for new—and often expensive—alternatives. While a district court’s preliminary injunction allowed the churches to re-enter the public schools a month later and continue renting those spaces until a final ruling, the churches’ future was tenuous before Friday’s decision.

    “Today is a day of victory for religious freedom and religious liberty in the city of New York,” Pastor Bill Devlin said on Friday. “Houses of worship of all faiths can now breathe a sigh of relief due to today’s ruling.”

    In addition to constitutional questions surrounding the city’s ban, church leaders argued that prohibiting congregations from using public schools would jeopardize many churches’ successful efforts to serve the poor, reach out to gang members, and continue other charitable work in surrounding neighborhoods.

    “There is no reason to exclude worship services from these empty school buildings, especially when the school allows all other community groups to meet,” Lorence continued. “Why exclude churches that are helping their neighbors in so many significant ways?”

    The city can appeal the court’s decision, something ADF expects and is prepared for. For now, weekend worship services will continue.

    It’s appropriate that this victory for religious liberty comes during the two weeks of the Fortnight for Freedom—a time for Americans to promote the benefits of our first freedom and demand greater respect for this cherished liberty.

    The Fortnight for Freedom will culminate this week on July 4 as churches across the country ring their bells at 12 noon (EST) to celebrate religious freedom. While the New York City churches affected by Friday’s ruling may not have bell towers to physically participate in the celebration, they’ll certainly have a personal and deep appreciation for the blessing of religious freedom this holiday.

    Posted in Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    10 Responses to Religious Liberty Victory for NYC Churches

    1. Matthew says:

      Finally some good news.

    2. Marty in SC says:

      This is common place in much of the country. It is sad to see that that some groups or regions will do anything they can to drive God out of the culture of this great country of ours. God Bless the USA!!!

    3. R. Richards says:

      It is ALL our freedoms they are after!

    4. Bobbie says:

      there is too much government abuse that discriminates with great bias. By government that isn't our personal own, this is wrong as tax dollars come from everyone, the government has no right to allow anyone to rule over anyone else or favor intolerances. When leaders are the ones with insecurities, there is no positive growth for this country and fairness is dissolved under the mental derangement of those in power who are insecure. Government says "its fair for this person to have a house less the responsibility to pay for it and maintain it?" People have to be under the same rules and responsibilities when it effects the economy and that's fair!

      Unless the faith has shown terroristic tendencies or threaten humanity, the government has no right to express their intolerances or ACT ON THEM! This is not how America requires her tax dollars spent or her leadership conducted.

    5. Helen Spingola says:


    6. Tom Platt says:

      One cannot help but wonder if the progressives in NYC would have prohibited Muslims from doing the same thing that Christians were doing? I think we can figure out what the answer would be, right?

    7. el polacko says:

      so does this mean that i can now rent out church buildings, on days other than sunday, for my sex education classes ? or is this another one of those 'one-way street' kind of rulings ?

    8. Gail Cohen says:

      Of course these "officials" say it is ok for Mosques to be built – but give a hard time to Christian churches – they are being bribed by rich Arabs – and stupid people keep voting for these criminals

    9. Blair Franconia, NH says:

      Is it permanent or temporary?

    10. Vazir Mukhtar says:

      Typical New York-style maneuver. School budget problems that could be partly addressed by renting schools to responsible tenants when the buildings were not occupied for school work. No way!

      Also typical maneuver by some people in authority. So much easier to say "no" than to figure out how to say "yes" and to do so lawfully.

      The claim by city officials and the Board of Education that "allowing religious services to be held in vacant public school facilities constitutes an inappropriate government endorsement of religion" is about as senseless as refusing to rent to any group on the basis that doing so constitutes an inappropriate government endorsement of whatever that group stands for.

      Of course, New York City doesn't have a monopoly on such cowardly silliness; it's just the most visible example.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.