• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Author Ed Conard Talks Bain Capital, Economics and Obama's Record

    Edward Conard spent 14 years as a partner at Bain Capital, the most scrutinized company in America. But these days, he’s in the news for another reason. As the author of “Unintended Consequences,” Conard has challenged the conventional wisdom about the U.S. economy and outlined ideas that have resulted in scorn from the New York Times and Jon Stewart.

    Conard visited Heritage this week to share his perspective at The Bloggers Briefing. He also sat down for an interview to talk about the book, media coverage of Bain Capital and why President Obama has such a poor economic record.

    While working for Bain Capital, Conard headed the firm’s New York office and oversaw the acquisition of large industrial companies. He also worked alongside Mitt Romney. So as the Washington Post and other media outlets examine Bain Capital, Conard sees the coverage not just as a critique of private equity but American business as well.

    “These are really attacks on business,” he said. “They pit employees against employers. It’s kind of old-fashioned union organizing in a sense. And they want to pretend that managers only work for investors, Bain Capital only works for investors. But they don’t realize we’re all working for the customer, first and foremost.”

    He noted the vast majority of Bain Capital’s investments were successful, growing two-and-a-half times faster than the S&P 500. Even though those investments added about $100 billion of revenue relative to the S&P 500, Bain is portrayed as a “vampire” and “job destroyer.”

    On Obama’s poor economic record — the unemployment rate stands at 8.2 percent — Conard attributes a “profound misunderstanding of what drives growth of the economy and what drives employment in the economy.” He continued:

    I think that by misinterpreting the financial crisis for political gain and turning employees against employers for political gain, I think he’s done a great disservice to the economy. I don’t think he’s fixed the problems that have to be fixed, and then on top of that he’s loaded an enormous amount of regulation on top, which increases uncertainty and only exacerbates an already a difficult problem of trying to get our economy to grow in the aftermath of the financial crisis. … It’s hard to rate that anything but poor.

    Despite the economic challenges facing America, Conard remains optimistic about the future of the country. He said workers in the United States are much more productive than their counterparts around the globe. That’s put tens of millions people to work.

    “No other high-wage economy has done more for the middle class and working poor than this economy,” he said.

    Critics have called Conard a defender of inequality. He responds by pointing to the absurdity of their arguments, which are often grounded in anything but economics. He said the likes of Joseph Stiglitz and Timothy Noah simply don’t see that the economy has shifted. His book is subtitled, “Why Everything You’ve Been Told About the Economy Is Wrong.”

    Conard calls it an innovation-based, risk-oriented, individual, entrepreneurial economy. He pointed to the 13 people who created Instagram and sold it for $1 billion in just two years.

    “Innovation is like looking for pieces in a jigsaw puzzle. You have to find a lot of pieces that don’t match to find the one or two pieces that match,” he explained. “And you have to motivate people to take almost certain failure to get a small amount of success, which has driven our economy forward. And if they don’t see high payoffs for success, it’s unlikely they will take the risk.”

    The interview runs about seven minutes. Hosted by Rob Bluey and produced by Brandon Stewart. For more videos from Heritage, subscribe to our YouTube channel.

    Posted in Economics, Featured, Ongoing Priorities, Scribe [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to Author Ed Conard Talks Bain Capital, Economics and Obama's Record

    1. Bobbie says:

      it's so low for someone to go out of the way for conceit to promote through distortions (false advertisement) then take more time to distort a man's integrity (slander) and think nothing of it as it's looked the other way in defense of the conceited. and here, there is a man in the highest office of America handsomely paid doing just that slander, false advertisement etc. He has to be challenged on his accusations. This man has no ethics nor follows any code. The only ones in support of his favor are the more unknowns America realizes. He treats us like we're all mentally vulnerable and the media lets him, with humor. America doesn't want to be represented by a man who puts his own people and personal achievements down. His conduct doesn't meet American average standards. His activists are dangers to America(ns.)

      When you can find out for yourself, don't take someone elses word.

    2. Terry says:

      What a man does in business speaks neither for nor against his abilities as a statesman. Astoundingly, we have absolutely no public dialogue on the capabilities of either candidate in terms of statesmanship.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×