• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Fabricated Details on Tax Reform

    The Democratic staff of the Joint Economic Committee (JEC) fabricated details about the tax reform outline passed by the House of Representatives as part of Budget Committee chairman Paul Ryan’s (R–WI) budget. Its “analysis” rests on thin air.

    The Ryan budget provides a tax reform outline—nothing more. It’s a guidepost for a future tax reform plan. It provides few details beyond a top tax rate of 25 percent and the desire to eliminate some deductions and credits. It also says the reform is to be revenue neutral—meaning it wouldn’t lower or raise taxes. The details are to be filled in later by the Ways and Means Committee when the time is right to advance tax reform.

    Undeterred by the lack of details necessary to do a legitimate economic analysis, the Democratic staff of the JEC  recently released a report claiming that the outline would be a big tax cut for the rich financed by raising taxes on the middle class. This despite the Ryan outline requiring the final plan to be revenue neutral.

    The JEC report premises this faulty conclusion on incomplete work from the Tax Policy Center (TPC). The TPC report is incomplete because, as it admits, there aren’t enough details for them to do a full analysis of the plan. Nevertheless, using the spare details available to them, they released a report showing the plan to be a tax cut and called it as much in a subsequent blog post.

    The TPC’s data cannot be used to draw any conclusions about the Ryan outline because it is incomplete. Despite the shortcomings of the TPC data, JEC still used it, and extrapolated further from it, to arrive at the faulty conclusion that the Ryan outline would be a tax cut for the rich financed by the middle class.

    To arrive at this erroneous conclusion, JEC had to make all sorts of assumptions about intricate details in the tax reform outline provided in the Ryan budget.—details that simply do not exist. For instance, JEC Democrats assume that the Ryan plan would eliminate deductions for state and local taxes, mortgage interest and charitable contributions, and the employer-provided health insurance exclusion and tax 401(k) contributions.

    Where did they come up with all that? They conjured it out of thin air.

    The whole premise of their argument—that the Ryan plan is a tax cut—is faulty as well. As Americans for Tax Reform explains, JEC assumes, using the incomplete TPC data, that the revenue basis for the tax reform outline is what the current code would raise if the Bush tax cuts expire and all the other Taxmageddon tax increases occur. This would push revenue to historic new heights.

    The Ryan plan makes the much more reasonable assumption that revenue will remain at historical averages. JEC’s flawed revenue assumption makes the Ryan outline look like an enormous tax cut when it isn’t a tax cut at all.

    The Washington Post, in an article by Lori Montgomery, reported the imagined elimination of deductions and credits, and revenue falsehood, as fact. Not so.

    The economy badly needs tax reform, because the current code is from a bygone era. It strangles economic growth and keeps us from reaching our productive capacity. The blatant misrepresentations of the Ryan tax outline are just that. We should get past such distortions of plans meant to propel tax reform forward. If we don’t, tax reform will remain stuck in neutral.

    [This post has been altered. The original post incorrectly implied that JEC and TPC worked together on the JEC’s report. It also stated that both JEC and TPC fabricated the deductions and credits the Ryan plan would curtail. Only the JEC explicitly listed those policies.]

    Posted in Economics [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to Fabricated Details on Tax Reform

    1. Bobbie says:

      these guys get paid to fabricate while some of America is still without truth. Keep pushing the truth. If democrats had a substantial job to America, America wouldn't have an employment problem, business problems, illegal invasion problem, a human dignity problem, a zero tolerance problem, an unconstitutional governing problem. Republicans listen to the people and do the job for the people with integrity and honor to serve with respect to the constitution. Democrats push for personal weakness to legislate safe guards in case someone's offended. Americans take pride in being represented by democrats or the democratic party? Telling people what will offend them? Not respecting it's not their role or area in personal determination? Don't let democrats disrespect your ability to take it to court!! Truth will set you free from government controlled dependency !!!!

    2. steve h says:

      Perhaps Chairman Ryan should actually detail how'd he reform taxes instead of using imaginary terms. He details how he'll decrease rates and details what spending he'll cut, but doesn't have the courage to detail tha tax expenditures he'd eliminate. What a cowardly joke.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.