• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Senator Moran Speaks at Heritage on the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty

    Yesterday, Senator Jerry Moran (R–KS) gave an important speech at The Heritage Foundation on the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), negotiations on which will open on July 2 in New York.

    Through letters to the Administration, legislation, and amendments, Moran has played the leading role in seeking to ensure, with his colleagues in both parties, that the ATT does not infringe on rights protected under the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

    Moran made a valuable contribution by pointing out that concerns about the ATT should not focus only on the Second Amendment. As he noted, the ATT will apply equally to dictatorships and democracies, a dangerous idea that implies that dictatorships have the same right to buy and sell weapons that democracies do.

    But in the context of the Second Amendment, the Senator noted that we should not be content with the Administration’s pledge not to negotiate a treaty that infringes on our rights. That is a step forward, but it is not enough. The Senator then set out four criteria that would put flesh on the bones of that pledge.

    1. The ATT should explicitly recognize the legitimacy of hunting, sport shooting, and other lawful activities related to the private ownership of firearms and related materials.
    2. The ATT should not simply contain a vague reference in the preamble to national constitutional protections. Its scope should explicitly exclude small arms, light weapons, and related materials that are defined under domestic law by national authority as legal for private ownership.
    3. The ATT should not contain any open-ended obligations that could imply any need to impose domestic controls on any of these items.
    4. The ATT should explicitly state that any assertion of the right of sovereign states to individual or collective self-defense does not prejudice the inherent right of personal self-defense.

    Let’s hope that the Senate, and the Administration, take these concerns seriously, for the U.N. is unlikely to do so.

    Shortly after Moran finished his speech, the U.N. released its press kit for the July conference. The kit’s cover letter closes with a sneering criticism of “gun-lobby organizations,” and that tone continues throughout the kit, which makes two things very clear.

    First, the U.N. is willing to be a lot more explicit in its criticism of “gun-lobby organizations” than it is of dictators and terrorists. Second, the U.N. isn’t worried that dictators will stop the ATT; it’s worried that Americans concerned about the Second Amendment will do so.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    6 Responses to Senator Moran Speaks at Heritage on the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty

    1. Iceman says:

      There should be none of those things in the ATT, and the 1968 act to regulate firearms is unconstitutional as well. The second amendment doesn't guarantee any right it re-affirms a right that all free people have that no Government or Political body has authority to regulate "The right of the people to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED".

    2. Kahr50 says:

      Dictators disarm.

      Free people arm.

      It is no wonder they are afraid of us and not dictators.

    3. James says:

      We Kansans are proud to count Jerry Moran as one of our own.

    4. Mary Hughes says:

      Just as once before, there needs to be several brave and strong Congressman or Senators who would address the United Nations. They need to be reassured that the people of the United States would not tolerate any attempt to de arm them. They also need to be reminded that our Highest Court has recently upheld our right to be armed. In addition in our country, NO One Other than the Senate of the U.S. can sign a treaty with any one. While lately the President has been acting outside of his authority on numerous occasions, should he attempt to sign some kind of treaty with the U.N., the U.N. would find it wasn't worth the paper it was written upon. Last of all the U.N. exists primarly upon the goodness of the American citizens. For once again the U.S. provides for the majority of the UN financial support and that too can change.

    5. 66corky66 says:

      The UN can kindly put it where the Sun don't shine. I WILL keep my guns even if I have to bury them for later use. This is The United States of America and we are and will remain a FREE PEOPLE!

    6. Cravczec says:

      This treaty is completely unnecessary. It should be ignored by the United States. Just because some
      bureucrat or politician thinks up some crazy crap it doen's mean that the rest of us have to comply with their lunacy.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.