• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Morning Bell: President Obama's Fast and Furious Scandal Grows

    On the night of December 15, 2010, U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry was shot and killed by an untraceable assault weapon that was deliberately handed to Mexican drug lords by U.S. officials via Operation Fast and Furious. Ever since, the Terry family and Americans across the nation have asked how this could have happened.

    And ever since, Attorney General Eric Holder has stonewalled Congress in its attempts to find these answers. Yesterday, President Obama joined this stonewalling effort, asserting executive privilege over many of the documents about the operation that Congress had subpoenaed but still had not received.

    Executive privilege is legitimate when properly invoked. But even then, the Supreme Court has maintained that it is not absolute. The Department of Justice (DOJ) must provide a compelling rationale for each assertion. Shielding wrongdoing has never been a qualifying rationale.

    Heritage legal expert and former Department of Justice counsel Todd Gaziano explains:

    First, the Supreme Court in United States v. Nixon (1974) held that executive privilege cannot be invoked at all if the purpose is to shield wrongdoing. The courts held that [President] Nixon’s purported invocation of executive privilege was illegitimate, in part, for that reason. There is reason to suspect that this might be the case in the Fast and Furious cover-up and stonewalling effort. Congress needs to get to the bottom of that question to prevent an illegal invocation of executive privilege and further abuses of power. That will require an index of the withheld documents and an explanation of why each of them is covered by executive privilege—and more.

    It is now up to Congress to ascertain the specific reasoning for executive privilege with every withheld document. Even in the unlikely case it is determined that this was a proper invocation of executive privilege, the administration is still not off the hook to inform Congress of what they know.

    Gaziano explains further:

    [T]he President is required when invoking executive privilege to try to accommodate the other branches’ legitimate information needs in some other way. For example, it does not harm executive power for the President to selectively waive executive privilege in most instances, even if it hurts him politically by exposing a terrible policy failure or wrongdoing among his staff. The history of executive–congressional relations is filled with accommodations and waivers of privilege. In contrast to voluntary waivers of privilege, Watergate demonstrates that wrongful invocations of privilege can seriously damage the office of the presidency when Congress and the courts impose new constraints on the President’s discretion or power (some rightful and some not).

    President Obama now owns the Fast and Furious scandal. It is entirely up to him whether he wants to live up to the transparency promises he made four years ago, or further develop a shroud of secrecy that would make President Richard Nixon blush. If the stonewalling continues, and the privilege is not waived, it will be up to the American people and the media to demand the reasoning for the cover-up.

    It is also time for the media to begin responsibly covering this scandal. For more than 16 months, only a handful of reporters have appropriately researched the facts and sought answers. Most members of the national media would not even acknowledge the existence of the scandal. Reportedly, NBC Nightly News ran its first story on the scandal just this past Tuesday.

    The national media must now follow the lead of their colleagues CBS reporter Sharyl Attkisson or Townhall’s Katie Pavlich and investigate the specific facts and details of the operation and administration involvement. Attkisson, as you may remember, was screamed and cussed at by White House spokesman Eric Schultz in October for asking questions about Operation Fast and Furious.

    Answers must be demanded. When was the first time President Obama was briefed on this operation? Given his previous conflicting testimony, when in fact did Attorney General Eric Holder become involved? What exactly did he know and when did he know it?

    Despite the fact that Mexico was left in the dark by the Obama administration, this was still an international operation. If Secretary of State Hillary Clinton must approve the Keystone pipeline, wouldn’t she also be consulted on this cross-border operation?

    Liberals will try and pretend this operation that began in mid-2009 is connected to former President George W. Bush’s administration. The media should challenge this false assertion. Operation Wide Receiver in 2006 did not remotely resemble Fast and Furious, as National Review’s Andrew McCarthy has ably examined. Mexico helped coordinate it, and there was traceable controlled delivery. Even Holder admitted in testimony that you cannot “equate the two.”

    We will also hear that this is “election-year politics.” The problem with that refrain is that this investigation has been ongoing since early 2011, well before campaign season started. It has been Attorney General Holder’s evasiveness that has dragged this process closer to Election Day.

    If it were not for conservative media outlets, bloggers, a few dogged reporters and the steadfastness of House Government Reform Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA), this troubling scandal would have been buried long ago.

    A brave American border agent is dead. At least 200 Mexicans have been slaughtered with these weapons. Drug violence on the border remains unabated. Now, President Obama is attempting to conceal the facts of what happened. This is an opportunity for Congress and the media to demand sunlight.

    Quick Hits:

    • “The Obama administration distributed $9 billion in economic ‘stimulus’ funds to solar and wind projects in 2009-11 that reportedly created, as the end result, only 910 ‘direct’ jobs,” at approximately $9.8 million per job, reports CNSNews.
    • Mitt Romney is scheduled to address the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials today on immigration and other topics.
    • In New York state, the legislature is debating how widely to release teacher evaluations. Governor Andrew Cuomo (D) has proposed blocking teacher evaluations from public view.
    • ABC gives a rundown of the decisions still expected from the Supreme Court before it ends its term.
    • Today is the first day of the Fortnight for Freedom, a drive to celebrate religious freedom leading up to July 4. Heritage has 12 ways you can get involved in your community during the next two weeks.
    Posted in Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    104 Responses to Morning Bell: President Obama's Fast and Furious Scandal Grows

    1. Gramma says:

      This is so much worse than breaking into the D HQ–immediate call for resignation of this Non-president and all people involved should be in place. Where are the backbones?

      • Sherman Danio says:

        No sense looking for the back bone of any politician, there are none. What we have today are milk toast
        politicians afraid of their own shadows. They are more concerned with preserving their outlandish benefits and pay and being on the inside of the next get rich opportunity. It was better when politicians did not get paid, but volunteered their time and devotion to country and liberty. It is way past time to gut the benefits and cut the pay so they have to live like an average American, then perhaps they will understand the needs of the citizens of this Great Nation in which we live.

      • O2BMe says:

        Your so right. People weren't killed in the Nixon fiasco. Since when does the media not stand up and scream when an American citizen is killed. What about the hundreds of Mexican citizens killed. Every one of them was special to someone. Where is the justice, not vengence, just justice. There is no way that this information would endanger our country, just politicians Executive Privilege should not apply here.

      • C Popham Smith says:

        First and foremost, you must understand that there are no "backbones" in Congress or Washington,
        for almost every Congressperson is complicit in their vile support of this malevolent dictator
        in the White House. Barack Hussein Obama has accumulated more executive power in the last
        six months alone, than any president in history.
        Good luck, America.

      • Ray Burke says:

        Backbones dissolve under the withering influence of the CABAL.

      • ZZCharlie says:

        You can not cover up this and the press is going to have to go to work for once and get to the truth people are dead and dying and there are people that have known about this

      • Vince says:

        We can make get rid of this "non-president" by signing up at oustobamacoalition.net

    2. Jim Uberti says:

      It will be very interesting to see how the MSM handles this scandal now that it's out in the open.
      Democrats will claim that it's election year politics, but will the media echo that claim?
      The very fact that Obama has resorted to Executive Privilege tells us that he, or more certainly, Holder is going to be damaged by the documents that they're trying to hide.
      Whether this issue becomes a "cause celebre" of the coming election will depend on how the media tries to spin it away from Obama. Don't be surprised to see Holder thrown under Obama's bus.

      • C Popham Smith says:

        Obama will think long and hard before "throwing Holder under the bus", because in 2008
        Holder donated a huge amount of money to the campaign and secured other multiple
        large donors as well.

        • Jeanne Stotler says:

          Money isn't the only reason, Holder knows where all te bodies r buried, Birth certificate, SS card, draftt registration, school records, etc. Holder could blow the lid off his reelection

          • Lisa says:

            You may want to do some research on who started “Fast & Furious”….. Yes, that’s right, the one and only George W. Bush. Educate your self, don’t be lead like cattle.

            A mind is a terrible thing to waste!!! So please use it the way God intended….

            • DMJ says:

              No, Fast and Furious was not started by Bush. Bush started "Operation Wide Receiver", which was done in conjunction with the Mexican government to track the guns that went from the U.S. to Mexico for the purpose of catching violent criminals in Mexico. Fast and Furious was not done with the Mexican government's involvement and the guns were not tracked; they were just let loose to the Mexican criminals. The purpose of Fast and Furious was to create a false claim that United States citizens' freedom to own guns was causing crime in Mexico, and then ban guns in the U.S.
              The goals were completely different between these two programs; Eric Holder even admitted so in front of Congress.
              Sorry to burst your bubble, there.

    3. rockncoal says:

      Here's hoping Fast & Furious becomes the proverbial albatross around his neck. There seems to be corruption at every turn in the Obama administration!

      • Mary Holmes says:

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9sBBm43Ee0 Have you all seen this? Ogden says "Under the presidents leadership", and calls it "Project Gunrunner", someone should email this to Issa and the congress, they need to take action against Obama, Holder and Napolitano for this and for lying to congress.

    4. John Szeker says:

      This is another example of Obama'a attempt to circumvent the law – he should be impeached for this and other illegal, unconstitutional steps he has taken in the last 3 years – but of course we all know this will never happen. In my opinion, he, and his administration, are the most devious, lying group of politicians we have ever had in our history, and he must be defeated in the coming election before he completely destroys our great country. The Democrats care more about staying in power that the welfare our our country.

      • This is true. My question is… Why is the GOP allowing it to drag on? The next question is will Boehner expidite the floor vote on Contempt or will it get buried?

      • "Issa sounds like a mob lawyer fishing for the identity of witnesses and informants so they can be eliminated. It looks like the Sinaloa Cartel set up the hit to dirty up ATF, they were getting to close to some major Sinaloa Cartel players. Who ordered the hit? They left their guns at the scene? Makes no sense they should be at the bottom of the Pacific Ocean."

        The Sinaloa Cartel was the driving force behind the 911 attacks. The Taliban had cut off their source of opium and Iran was cutting off their smugging routes across Iran. They have the same concerns today.

    5. G. Hugh Bodell says:

      I know this may sound a bit ‘edgy’ but if both Holder and Obama had active involvement in putting the weapon into the hands of the murderer of U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry, does this constitute ‘Accessory Before The Fact’ of the President of the United States and his Attorney General in that murder?

      • Robert Carousel says:

        Actually you have a good point. Certainly the President is obligated to carry out the laws of the land which Congress is mandated to have the power to develop under the Constitution. And the President cannot make or change laws. So in effect they are perhaps indeed covering up a scheme developed by Obama and the Mexican President and coordinated by Napolitano and (to me) obstructing justice in a murder investigation let alone exceeding Separation of Powers.

      • Ronald k. Sherbert says:

        I aggree all the way. In the 2008 election of Barrak Obama. these numbers may not be exact,but 1500
        Born again Christians did not vote. Obama won whith only 800 votes. It has been noted in many reports
        that he commited many fraudenent acts to get votes. in conclusion every one should vote;no excuses

      • RHN - Attorney says:

        Interesting argument for accessory liability, however several hurdles must be crossed to get there. First, there is only the concealment of documents right now; there would need to be evidence of actions taken in furtherance of the cirme. Then we would have to ask, were Holder and Obama aware of any common plan to use these weapons to murder US Citizens or anyone within US Borders? Was it forseeable that weapons used to track the extent of cartel operations (arguably a legitimate purpose) could be used in such a crime. Then we get to immunity of law enforcement officials acting in the course of duty. Then we get to executive immunity from prosecution. While I agree that any action to place Assault Weapons into the hands of Dangerous Criminials would result in Forseeable Murder, it would be one heck of a trial and the US Taxpayer would foot both sides of an 8-9 figure leagal bill. Remember this is the president who is raising $1Billion for re-election; surely, he would spend 1-10% of that to clear this legal issue from his campaign trail.

      • Mary Holmes says:

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9sBBm43Ee0 Yes as proven by this. I encourage everyone to watch it and pass it on.

    6. Conservative Dave says:

      Obumble strikes again. That Holder had already sent the request to Obama before the last meeting with Issa proves he has no intention of cooperating. Smells like a whole family of skunks to me. Vote them out in November is the only cure.

      • I submit he has to be held accountable before the election to avoid the lame duck session!

      • Ray Burke says:

        Sadly, we are required to depend upon that vast collection of fools we usually refer to as the electorate, to determine our survival as a Constitutional Republic. Considering our recent past experience with this unreliable mob, I fear the worst.

    7. hope says:

      Obama Knew About Gun Walking Program in 2009 – Used “Fast & Furious” To Make Case For Gun Regulations (Video) http://tinyurl.com/7wv4z7r

    8. Joe T. says:

      Too bad Obama can't be charged with contempt of Congress.

      • freedom says:

        There's nothing to stop discerning American voters with charging this president fired in November.

    9. Jeanne Stotler says:

      This was supposed to be the most transparent administration in modern times, well what happened?? This is sure ground for impeachment, this POTUS has committed Treason, he has over stepped his authority many times, selling the USA to Mexico and refusing to uphold the Constitution, a clear violation of the oath he took. Beware, he's not through yet, if the election does not go his way, he will invoke another executive order, this time making himself President for life, he's a Marxist and likes the authority.

      • Diane says:

        That's what I'm concerned about….Woe to uSA because it was the will of the people that handed the reins of power to him,not me of course.

        • Jeanne Stotler says:

          Me either, when I first saw him "read " on TV, I saw a puppet and was scared of what he really was, then came the BC and school records and I knew he had something to hide.

      • Joseph McKennan says:

        You hit the nail on the head again. I have been concerned that BHO would declare himself POTUS for life. I have never even considered voting for this enigma. A muslim communist who is very good at the scathing boast ( like the boasting horn in the book of Daniel) but… that is all the talent he has. I see the policies at work in this country as the result of a " juvenile delinquent at the throttle of a futuristic locomotive going full blast and he doesn't know where the brake is."
        God bless you and all other true americans.

    10. Johncdavidson says:

      Too much tolerance for the wayward activities of the Democrats in Washington. That has to stop!

      This proves how out of control it has gotten. Common sense must replace selective justice in our legal system if this country is to survive as a Dwemocracy.

    11. bonner83856 says:

      Barack Obama might have written, for Karl Marx, the declaration, "The end justifies the means." He is a pathological liar who will cover up murder in order to gain re-election. I am not surprised democrats stonewall the investigation but they should be ashamed of themselves. If wishes could come true, Holder will eventually be tried for perjury and Obama will be unelected in disgrace. I understand the ethics of the tiniest cog in the wheel is of no interest to anyone else but if I were president I swear I would insist on full disclosure even if I were led out of office in disgrace. The honor of being able to smile at myself in the mirror is infinitely more important to me.

      • will says:

        George Washington had some thoughts on why the Constitution must be protected from "End justifies the means" rationalizations:
        “If in the opinion of the people the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpation; for though this in one instance may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed.”
        GEORGE WASHINGTON, Farewell Address, Sep. 17, 1796

      • Alan Kolkow says:

        He needs to be impeached and convicted for his crimes. And he should receive no after presidency benefits…..Absolutely nothing!. He has broken his sacred oath time and time again. Now it is time this dog had his day.

    12. Buzdad says:

      CBS News, at least, has just found a smoking gun:

      On July 14, 2010 after ATF headquarters in Washington D.C. received an update on Fast and Furious, ATF Field Ops Assistant Director Mark Chait emailed Bill Newell, ATF's Phoenix Special Agent in Charge of Fast and Furious:

      "Bill – can you see if these guns were all purchased from the same (licensed gun dealer) and at one time. We are looking at anecdotal cases to support a demand letter on long gun multiple sales. Thanks."

    13. Jack Penland says:

      There is an explanation for this; one that I have heard before, but I didn't think even Obama would be that brazen. Although he has been fairly quiet on the subject, Obama's antipathy toward the Second Amendment in general, and private firearms ownership in particular is well documented from his time as a Senator. I have heard the speculation that part of the reason for "Fast and Furious" was to manufacture firearms crimes in order to gin up support for forthcoming restrictive gun control Obama is known to favor. I would not put this past this administration, given their propensity for lying and obfuscation. In fact, I think it is a major factor in this ongoing political farce. The BATFE has a history of trampling people's rights and ignoring the law, and is always far worse when given free rein by Democrats such as Obama, Clinton, and don't forget Carter. Most all of their abuses have happened during Democratic anti-gun pograms.

      • Jack Penland you are right. When politicians are so influenced by their "base" that they'll break the Law because of the Spineless Manipulation by the Base, then we get the Fast & Furious Debacle. In this case part of Obama's Base are the "Rabid Dog Anti-Gun Marxist Loving Crazed Sarah Brady Types" who insist on the total Ban of any Firearms in the US despite the Second Amendment and the US Supreme Court Opinions which clearly state that the Right to Keep and Bear Arms is an Individual Right. They want Guns Gone at any Price, including lives of people killed due to their Rabid Obsession. They are as Guilty of Murder as the Mexcan Drug Dealer who pulled the Trigger.

        • Jeanne Stotler says:

          If we were all robbed of our guns, we would be easier to round up and placed in detention camps, We are already names on list as unco-operative, See how BHO nestled up to Mexico's Pres. they are all under control of the "Shadow Party" and Geo. Soros's desire for a one world party.

    14. Lloyd Scallan says:

      It is so disappointing that Mr. Cooper and HF still do not realize who and what they are dealing with when Obama or any of his administrative lackeys are involved. Since when has Obama had any respect for the Rule of Law? Since when has Obama shown support for the Supreme Court? Since when has Obama been "transparent"? Since when has Obama shown any respect for the American people, dead federal agents, Mexican citizens, or their families? Since when has the national media reported any truth about Obama? Why does Mr. Cooper not understand that "Fast and Furious" was a scheme developed by Obama, Holder, and Clinton to force more gun control restriction on the American public. Why doesn't Mr. Cooper, the HF, and the people of this once great nation realize who and what is Obama? If this guy is reelected God help us all. Even if he is not, just imagine what will happen before Romney takes office.

      • Jules Guidry says:

        HF cannot step out and accuse the administration of setting up "fast and furious" for the purpose of forcing more gun control restrictions on the American public without evidence to back up the assertion. Unlike the MSM, HF wants to back up their accusations with proof that it was done for your stated purpose.
        You and I are not burdened with that ethic, for the most part. We can look at the situation and using our common sense and connecting the dots see the goals of this operation by the administration. Pure and simple, more gun control.
        My idea is that the administration would love to take our guns away so they can take over the country without worrying about the citizens forcibly resisting. That's what Marxist/Socialist/Communists want when trying to take control of a nation, A compliant populace with no means of resisting. Strict gun control would lessen the threat of a citizen resistance to complete takeover.
        Like you, I think there all kinds of maneuvers which will be attempted prior to the election, and, especially, after the election if the "One" is not reelected.

        • You're absolutely right! Disarm America so we will have no defense against this tyranny. The second amendment (I think) was put in place to fight "the enemy within". If need be we will have a second American revolution for much the same reasons. Taxation without representation. The current president wants to be the new American king for life. He wants to dictate how we live and die. In order to get our country back we have to get him and his cronies out of office and try them for treason!

    15. stephen says:

      I'll almost bet a dollar that your not going to like the final explaination for Fast & Furious

    16. toledofan says:

      I think that fast and furious is probably the tip of the iceberg and as time goes on and the media, finally, starts to dig deeper, I'm sure there will be all sorts of corruption uncovered. It's too bad that the mainstream media invested their entire fortunes to protect this guy, I just wonder how many would do it, again, if they knew how inept Obama really was. It's, also, sad that so many were sucked into the notion that Obama was the savior, the guy who would finally bring everything together, and he turned out to be so far over his head he couldn't see the forest from the trees.

    17. Just Me says:

      The end is near for Obummer and his staff of liars. Big celebration on 11/7 for the downfall of Carters clear successor as the worst president in history. Sleep well Mr. President with your Nobel Peace Prize under your pillow

    18. Kevin Roy McGinty says:

      There are some other very serious considerations regarding this case that have not been addressed nor resolved satisfactorily. In addition to the Fast and Furious aspects of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry's death, some other purported details are quite troubling and have not been discussed. Some time ago on the Glenn Beck Show, a Retired Border Agent who is the President of the Retired Border Agents Association was commenting on the details surrounding Agent Terry's death. He was articulate and presented his facts well and in an objective manner. He was not distracted emotionally regarding the incident and his veracity in my opinion was not in question. This former Agent stated unequivocally that the Medical Choppers called in to remove Agent Terry and get him to adequate Medical Facilities for treatment could not land due to certain Federal Environmental Restrictions in the immediate area and that Agent Terry had to be transferred overland and partially involving horseback methods, which in the final analysis added four hours to the ordeal. I have tried to motivate several Conservative Websites with Investigative resources greater than mine to determine if this is credible information and would likewise request that of you. If this is even close to the eventual truth, the often used term," The Terry Family deserves better" becomes even more salient in this Administrations utter failings regarding transparency of this debacle. Would appreciate anything you can do to shed any light on the aforementioned information.

      • swimmergal says:

        "Federal Environmental Restrictions"!!! Damn the EPA and damn Obama and Holder! Sounds to me like they wanted Terry to die because of what he knew too. When this is finally all in the open, who knows what we are going to find out. We may all be shocked even more. Obama and Holder and a list of many others may very well find themselves in jail!

        • Joseph McKennan says:

          That is where they belong. It amazes me that politicians think they are above the law after they get elected. The whole stinking bunch should be incarcerated

    19. Mary......WI says:

      As far as I'm concerned Holder, Obama and his administration are GUILTY! Enough is enough! This president misuses his presidential priveleges constantly. He's more a dictator than the president of the USA. Furthermore, race has nothing to do with any of the awful decisions he has made for the American people. He's a failure as a president. Vote him out in Nov. !!

      • Nancy says:

        Better yet… Go in and get Him NOW and all his administration that are guilty and throw their behinds in prison until they can get them to trial and convict them of treason. Why wait? we all know they are corrupt and are trying to take over America. Go get him today! Get them out of the White House before he does any more damage.

        • Jeanne Stotler says:

          Don't forget Prince Harry and Princess Nancy and anyone who backed this sham, Force the Gov. of Hawaii to open records as well as scholastic records from the colleges, if he went under a Exchange program, that would be fraud.

    20. Frank says:

      "Fast & Furious" reminds me of the Watergate scandal that eventually toppled Nixon, who also tried to invoke "Executive Privilege" to cover it up, just like Obama is trying to do now. It's pretty plain to me that the Obama Administration wanted "Fast & Furious" to eventually cause gun crimes & death to US citizens & then use those events to push for more gun control laws. The problem: the Obama Administration got caught in the act of sending those guns to Mexico illegally. I have no doubt: both Holder & Obama pushed this program forward secretly & they never expected their secrets to be exposed. But exposed it was by some government agents involved who opposed this program. This whole thing is one more "count" that can be made on a long list of "counts" for which Obama should be impeached!

    21. J E Houser says:

      By asserting executive privilege in not producing documents, is not that an admission that the White House was not involved or aware of the operation?

    22. Just Me says:

      Impeachment will never happen so we should all be happy with a crushing landslide loss in Nov

    23. James Covington says:

      withHolder needs to go…

    24. Rosemarie Osterndorf says:

      The American people should also know that close to three quarters of these fast and furious guns are still in the possession of Mexican criminals. How many murdered US border agents or Mexican citizens will it take before the rule of law applies to this Adminiistratio?

    25. haroldson says:

      seems like a pretty heavy handed action fora president to make , Almost admitting white house involvement if any one stops to think that would be the firs thing to inter their mind, Hopefully this will help sink him come the elections, that will be a blessing for the American people.

    26. @MPeriod says:

      Yawn — of course executive privledge can't shield wrongdoing, but thats the problem Issa has. The accusation that Eric Holder did do anything wrong is the trumped up political charge, and why most people are calling this entire farce a political witch hunt.

      Contrary to what most people seem to think the hearings aren't about gun walking, and letting Mexican criminals get guns….project gun runner was started in 2006, Congress approved and knew about it. So its not like Eric Holder (or someone in the justice department went rouge and started secretly selling guns in some shadowy sting operation) Nixon was covering up a crime, Eric Holder at worse is bad at his job… politically maybe a poor reflection on Obama, legally isn't a crime.

      • Lloyd Scallan says:

        Project Gun Runner was not ever close to Fast and Furious. During gun runner, the Mexican government was kept well informed and agreed. It was not forcing honest gun shops owners to sell
        gun to who they knew were straw buyer that the ATF and the Justice Department assured them was
        proper and protected because the government approved it. But the one fact that you miss is that
        Obama, Holder, Hillary came up with this scheme to force more gun restriction on US citizens. Obama knew about it and that's what he is hiding.

        • Joseph McKennan says:

          Gun control is absolutely right. At this time Obama's puppeteer– George Soros is actively buying up gun manufacturers and shutting them down. The latest being Marlin. Thomas Jefferson said that the right to keep and bear arms is the last defense against a tyrannical government. I have seen this coming for a while. If citizens do not take the initiative to get out and vote we might have to stash our guns in a safe place.

    27. @MPeriod says:

      Also a comment like this: "President Obama now owns the Fast and Furious scandal. It is entirely up to him whether he wants to live up to the transparency promises he made four years ago, or further develop a shroud of secrecy that would make President Richard Nixon blush" makes the article seem overly bias……calling Obama out for breaking a campaign promise of transparency is a political argument, not a legal or fact based one

      • Bobbie says:

        calling Obama out for breaking a campaign promise of transparency who hasn't shown any willingness to be transparent shows the kind of man he is. FACT ONE AND ONLY!

    28. Wes Evans says:

      Is the stone walling on Fast and Furious a red herring designed to distract media, the public and the Republicans attention from the disaster that the administration's economic/political agenda has caused to the the private sector of the US economy? Too much attention to this matter my be a political mistake.

    29. Bell says:

      Looks to me like Holder is going to get away with what he has done and the president is too. At least on this planet, but with Gods judgement, they won't. It so sad, that most of these people care so much for themselves and soooo little for the people.

    30. Kupe says:

      This is just as unconscionable as George Bush using executive privilege to cover up the Pat Tillman investigation, Karl Rove's role in the federal prosecutor firings, or the other 4 times he used executive privilege in his 2 terms. No president should be allowed this action. Period.

    31. Derek Welborn says:

      I would be very wary of the C-in-C and every one of his supporters in and out of government!
      From a distance it appears that O supporters have gone to great lengths to to set the stage for a Socialistic makeover of the American landscape. Our Constitution and Liberties as Americans ARE in danger from the smooth operator.

      Every vote will count this November! Get the word out there to vote and be heard else we may lose this precious gift that God gave us.

      • Jeanne Stotler says:

        And let's pray Derek, that we can prevent his egotistical soul from declaring Marshall Law an declare the election Null and Void and name himself President for life.

    32. victorbarney says:

      Here's what's in the Bible: 1. We get punished first because our CREATOR ALWAYS PUNISHES HIS OWN FIRST! That is found in Revelation, chpater 11. 2. Our SAVIOR PUNISHES ISLAM IMMEDIATELY UPON HIS RETURN STATES REVELATION, chapter 16 CLEARLY, NOT U.S., already punished by the two-wintesses found in chpater 11. Just saying…

    33. MBelcher says:

      It is sad and heart breaking to see how this administration continues to abuse our constitution and worst of all our so call Free Press has become shackled with this currupt administration. Shades of Third World Nations and Olligarchy.

    34. C Popham Smith says:

      Without doubt, yesterday's events; contempt of Holder and the invocation of executive privilege
      constitute the beginning,[ almost 40 years to the day], of 'Watergate 2012'.
      History does indeed repeat itself. An executive order leading to cover-up, denials, deceit, conspiracy
      and lies in an election year. However, the scandal here involves Democrats. Clearly, in spite of the
      deaths in this case, this scandal will be spinned and spinned again until after the Nov. 6th election.
      But we must not allow it to be spinned. A crime has been committed and the White House knew about it.

    35. Carol, AZ says:

      So H. F. has finally woken up over this pervasive lawlessness, ignored for months._Our foreign student, Barry has led the way and his lawlessness has resulted in bleeding bodies arcross America.
      His memo's handed down to every agencies sworn to protect us , has given 'stand down orders." for the the rule of law. This would include to the Dept of H.LS. and the directive to our Border agents to " stand down" on arrests and deportations. This includes to John Morton of ATF, for the 'stand down" for the arrests of illegals with outstanding warrants.This includes the clear tactics to backdoor gun control .This includes via his homeboy Eric, along with the Justice Dept to arm the enmeny.
      You want transparency Hertiage. Connect the conduit that leads right to the W.H and give justice to Brain and his family, and to America.

    36. Jeanette WIlliams says:

      he does not care..he thinks he is above the law because he can always play the race card and the people (sheep) that blindly follow him will cause a racial revolt …….I would not believe that americans could be so easily led to slaughter and let our countrys principles and constitution be distroyed without an uprising or a fight……….If he was 100 % white and not a dark skinned 1/2 white that only recognizes his afro american side he would have done been impeached …….

      • Carol, AZ says:

        Your right : We all know he doesn't care
        But we do care here and also believe that Brain is America's son.

    37. Issa sounds like a mob lawyer fishing for the identity of witnesses and informants so they can be eliminated. It looks like the Sinaloa Cartel set up the hit on Agent Terry to dirty up ATF, they were getting to close to some major Sinaloa Cartel players. Who ordered the hit? They left their guns at the scene? Makes no sense they should be at the bottom of the Pacific Ocean.

      The Sinaloa Cartel was the driving force behind the 911 attacks. The Taliban had cut off their source of opium and Iran was cutting off their smugging routes across Iran. They have the same concerns today.

    38. Pete Houston says:

      Time for a new sheriff and mayor in town. The two of them should be hung up in the oak tree on the edge of town. What in the world where they doing selling guns to the drug cartel knowing full well that they would be used to kill people. At the least they should be breaking rocks making little ones out of big ones.

    39. Paul says:

      smells like "obstruction of JUSTICE ' to me an empeachable offense…. for Obamason

    40. Bobbie says:

      Americans, we need to demand the American peoples' expectations of this administration. We need to address accountabilities and hold the government workers from the President on down, accountable with reprimand. This behavior of deceit and cover-up is unacceptable in a civil nation. It's resembling the conduct of 3rd world leaders and the mental abuse they put on the people.

      Congress isn't asking anything that takes questioning or hesitation. Paul is absolutely right! It's a TOTAL OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE by people abusively TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THEIR leadership roles and of AMERICA! Their government acts and voices slander America(NS), steal from America, abuse and rape America, kill innocent lives and America isn't going to stand for it!

      AMERICA IS FOR FREE PEOPLE NOT high paid low lifes INFILTRATING GOVERNMENT ISMS! We deserve the truth in answers regarding all matters at our expense, handled by government (outside our control) destroying America's good name and the lives of good people. We are a civil nation that values human life with expectations that Mr. Holder and many others don't come to respect but take for granted to lessen our expectations at their level.

      If a man is without integrity and dignity, what good is he as a man? If a representative government is without integrity and dignity, what good is it as a government outside our own? No good people. This government controlled failure should have been efficiently handled in a two month timely manner.

      When adults have to deal with adults with juvenile mindsets and sympathies, contempt arises. The juvenile mindsets protect their own sensitivities while Holders obligated duty to explain the lives he had killed are hidden? Democrats call truth a witch hunt. A diversion of the real problems democrats worsen with no effort to "change." While the true republicans admired, never stop working in respect to this beloved country and humanity with diligence to correct the constitutional principles weakened by the disrespects of past and present, abusive and unconstitutional governments. Today this country would be so awesomely IT if those in leadership would've taken on the principles of President Reagan and the like! May this scandal come to correct America's error.

    41. G.P. says:

      This problem with this analysis of "executive privilege" and its legitimate use by the Executive Branch is that it presupposes someone in the current administration actually cares about such high-minded concepts. They don't! This gang of miscreants now in power is so contemptuous of governmental processes and legal procedures, they could care less about how their misdeeds are viewed by traditionalist minded reviewers or commentors. They simply bull their way ahead, knowing full well that no one in any any position of authority is willing to forcefully challenge them for fear of political or physical repercussions.

      Don't expect criminals to play by conventional rules, unless you're willing to be content with the consequences.

    42. foxy says:

      I want to know when just one politician or reporter (of this country) has the backbone & moral fiber to finally stand up & lead the way for this self appointed dictator to be impeached? WHEN? He is far worse than what our prisons are filled with!

    43. foxy says:

      Impeachment is imperitve to save our county; God forbid if he is re-elected. USA is doomed, guaranteed!

    44. Joseph McKennan says:

      In my mind executive privilege is used by a popular AMERICAN president who has earned the respect and trust of the citizens. That leaves BHO out.

    45. Sorry Sally says:

      The indignation and fury some Americans feel because of Obama's criminal tactics, sadly, are not felt by the majority of U.S. citizens. Apparently, Obama is still ahead in the polls even if its only a few points. That is very, very troubling because this arrogant liar could still pull off a surprising victory according to some. I honestly believe that people who would still vote for Obama are either unmistakeably ignorant, marxist, or America-hating liberals. And it seems there are a lot of them out there! We are in real trouble here in America, and I am heartbroken that we have gotten to this point. (Sigh!)

    46. Blair Franconia, NH says:


    47. @RKahendi says:

      Methinks American politics is like a soap opera. Most of the suspense and high-stakes plot turns are fabricated by the media and by invested folks on both sides. The facts on the ground are much more complicated than most are willing to acknowledge: http://fromthoughtsintowords.blogspot.com/2012/06

    48. JJMcD says:

      On March 24, 2009, the Obama administration announced Project "Gun Runner".

      Presidential Press Secretary Robert Gibbs discussed "an issue that is very important to the President" included in the Press Conference was David Ogden, Deputy Attorney General who stated "under the President's leadership", "the President directed us", "Attorney General Holder and I (Ogden) are taking several new and aggressive steps…using $10 million" in TARP funds "to fortify Project Gun Runner", "to facilitate gun tracing".

    49. cruzin77 says:

      Here is one crisis they hope goes to waste.

    50. Vince Picarello says:

      Fast & furious is just one of many reasons why we must get rid of theis president and his adminstration. sign up at oustobamacoalition.com

    51. Clearhead says:

      Question: How many people were killed as a result of the D HQ breakin?
      Answer: None
      Result: Presidential impeachment and resignation

      Question: How many people were killed as a result of the "Fast and Furious" debacle?
      Answer: One American and 200 or so Mexicans (that we know of)

    52. Luke says:


      It's about time somebody said it.

    53. Mary says:

      Why do we think this president would be truthful about ANYTHING! I am so upset that there is zero integrety in this whitehouse. It sickens me because I can't stop it. Only in November will I get my say. Why don't they impeach him for his lies, violation of the Constitution, breaking the law in so many areas. Why? If we did those terrible things, we would be held accountable.

    54. Rachel says:

      As a retired peace officer I took great interest in Fast and Furious and have followed the information on it as it has become available. I have watched every committee hearing on this issue.

      The current adminstration keeps bringing up a former gun walking operation known as Wide Receiver, which was authorized under the Bush administration. However, there are MASSIVE glaring differences between Wide Receiver and Fast and Furious.

      1. Wide Receiver was a JOINT effort between the US and Mexican governments. However the Mexican government was never even informed about the existence of Fast and Furious.
      2. Wide Receiver involved a few hundred weapons which were tracked utilizing RFID tracking devices and not a single weapon was lost, whereas Fast and Furious involved thousands of weapons and no attempt was made to track them resulting in HUNDREDS OF LOST HIGH POWERED WEAPONS.
      3. Nobody lost their life as a result of Wide Receiver, whereas Fast and Furious resulted in the MURDERS of more than 300 Mexican citizens and 2 US Federal agents.
      4. Wide Receiver was a genuine effort by the governments of the US and Mexico to track the weapons to the cartels to get intelligence on their operations. Fast and Furious was little more than a smoke screen used by the current administration in an effort to promote it's political agenda of depriving US citizens of their Second Amendment rights.
      5. Wide Receiver was a legally authorized operation where accountability was accepted by the Bush administration and handled appropriately through international channels with Mexico. Fast and Furious was an ILLEGAL operation that was TREASONOUS and violated the territorial sovereignty of Mexico as well as US federal law and international laws/treaties. As soon as Fast and Furious came to light, according to the Obama administration, it was 'not authorized by either DOJ or the White House, therefore there is no accountability.

      Fast and Furious violated US Federal Laws as well as international laws and treaties from it's inception in 2009 with the current administration. Obama has stated publicly that neither he nor Holder authorized Fast and Furious and that he personally did not know anything about it, yet in order to exert executive privilege the operation would have had to have been 'derived from executive Constitutional authority' according to the SCOTUS decision in Nixon. In other words, it had to be a LEGAL operation in order for executive privilege to be exerted. The bottom line here is that even assuming that everything Obama says is true, which is beyond incomprehensible, not only does it show GROSS INCOMPETENCE, CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE and MALFEASANCE, it also shows that the current administration is willing to try to sweep it under the rug and hide their ineptitude through an invalid exertion of executive privilege. Obama is admitting culpability by attempting to exert executive privilege.

      On top of all this, it should be noted that more than $50 MILLION of our taxpayer dollars was used to fund this operation under the 'stimulus package' as one of Obama's 'shovel ready jobs'. So even assuming you can buy into all the rest of their claims of not knowing anything about it, can you honestly believe that Holder and Obama didn't know where $50 MILLION of the DOJ budget was going and what it was being used for? When I worked for the department I had to file reports on every penny spent and what that money was used for, even if it was 50 cents to inflate a tire with low pressure at a garage.

      The motto of Truman was 'THE BUCK STOPS HERE', compared to the current administrtion's motto of 'PASS THE BUCK'. This is deplorable state of affairs and a disgrace to our nation.

      Anyone involved in the authorization of Fast and Furious, including Holder and Obama, should be tried for TREASON and as accessories to the MURDERS of more than 300 Mexican citizens and 2 US Federal agents.

    55. wally says:

      Rory Cooper's article is misleading to me. How can the rifle be untraceable if we knew it was the one that was used in the drug smuggler attack? I hope he means that the rifle used in the attack was traceable as one from the Fast and Furious program but that the specific rifle may not have killed B. Tracy. From all the stonewalling being done by the AG and the POTUS, there is a smoking gun that may implicate both the AG and the POTUS. The citizens of this country need to know the truth in this program so the guilty are found and possibly prosecuted.

    56. retgrd says:

      I find it difficult to believe that low to mid-level law enforcement in conjunction with advisory legal and prosecutorial personnel would engage in an operation involving 1. high probability of being mostly foreign nationals representing foreign "organized crime" violating laws(illegal purchases, money laundering,etc) within the U.S. and 2. most of the "operation" being designed to occur in a foreign country without high level involvement. This supposedly was done by personnel fairly well experienced in foreigner arrests and border procedures of international law as well as ongoing case law development. Yet, we are to believe they failed to notify a "representative", ambassador, embassy of the foreign country or anyone in the U.S. State Dept. or any top level administrator of the executive branch of such an operation. It is my understanding even accidental entry by an armed U.S. agent requires such minimal notification as is arrest and charging of a foreign national. Thus, an in-depth inquiry as to who, what, why is logical and depending on level of notification-may in effect indicate a foreign policy toward such foreign government threatening its destabilisation.

    57. Lawrence Vetere says:

      Malfeasance –Officials Wrong Doing
      To begin we must ask the question; is wrong doing by elected government official morally or legally wrong? Official misconduct while in office can be both, with a proviso, that government officials or employee indicate they do not support and defend the Constitution. This then is de facto evidence of intentional malfeasance on their behalf and a conscious violation of the sworn Oath. But a conviction based upon law is virtually impossible, yet with the same breath they are both recognized in a court of law, the one however, is based upon moral guilt, the other, the letter of the law; thus proving the paradoxical stupidity by which the Criminal Justice System operates.

    58. Lawrence Vetere says:

      The justice system rule of law has become, as Shakespeare described life in Macbeth act 5 scene 5 “A tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury signifying nothing.” Because the rule of law, is absent “moral common sense” but is not absent malice, the opinion of these justices ‘tis “A writ –written by a rat,” willfully –purposefully –imposed to pervert the founders intentions of the law for their own personal gain, which is to circumvent the law, “only this and nothing more.”

    59. Lawrence Vetere says:

      “Accessories After the Fact”
      The English legal authority William Blackstone, in his famous Commentaries, defined an accessory as this, and, might I add this information is quite damming to any government employee including and not limed to the President. Blackstone wrights, “An accessory is he who is not the chief actor in an offence, nor present at the performance, but is someway concerned therein, either before or after the fact committed.” Hence a government officials such as the Attorney General could be charged with a criminal act and never be physically privy to said act, in other word, knowledge of said act is enough to qualify someone for being in some way concerned, as Blackstone mentioned.

    60. Lawrence Vetere says:

      The assistance to the criminal may be of any type, including emotions which I frequently talk about on Blog talk radio -Lawrence Live –that airs on Sunday’s at 1:00 left coast time. To continue, another way is by, financial assistance, such as, the way our Democratic Congress approving funds to “Bail Out” of banks, who then contribute heavily to Democratic champagnes which is, of course a legal kick back or graft. But assistance to a crime does not end there. Physical assistance or concealment of a crime is applicable too, which we observed, as Democrat legislators hid, behind closed doors to conceal the health care bill, a bill later to be claimed unconstitutional or against our Constitutional right as citizen? It is critical to understand that, any legislators involved in writing an unconstitutional bill, are then, criminally libel for a malfeasance.

    61. VotersOfNY says:

      Let’s start a fund for Brian Terry’s parent to take out advertising on TV, Radio, newspapers so they can tell their story on how Obama and Holder never even apologized and are trying to cover up their hero sons death.

      We can raise millions of dollars and plaster the parents all over the place until someone give the records to Congress as per the constitution requires. Obama AND Holder should both be held in contempt.

      Mr Terry and hundreds of other were killed in an illegal operation and they are trying to cover it up.

      And I wish the media would start referring to Mr Brian Terry by his name instead of ‘the agent’. Show some respect.

    62. Charles Webb says:

      I am ashamed, sick, tired and afraid that our Country is now a socialist, broke and weak nation. We have a dictator that is above all law and allowed to make his own laws. What has happened to God and Country? Faith and Trust? It's up to the next bunch of voters. We'll see………………………

    63. Guest Commenter says:

      Brian Terry was not killed BY an untraceable assault weapon. He was killed BY a human criminal. The criminal killed Brian Terry WITH an untraceable assault weapon. Big difference in the use of the words by and with. Using the word BY asserts that the weapon itself killed Terry when the weapon was merely a tool used and not the offender.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.