• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Pulling the Plug on Obama’s Energy Scheme

    Environmental Protection Agency

    The Senate will soon be called upon to disallow a multibillion-dollar regulation at the core of the Obama Administration’s twisted green energy regime. If allowed to stand, the so-called Utility MACT rule threatens to produce energy shortages, raise electricity rates, and destroy a multitude of jobs.

    Concocted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the 210-page regulation requires utilities and other electricity generators fueled by fossil fuels (gasp!) to install the “maximum achievable control technology” (MACT) to limit emissions of mercury and other byproducts of combustion.

    The EPA estimates the rule will cost $9.6 billion annually, to be paid by utilities and customers alike for new equipment, monitoring and reporting, loss of generating capacity, and higher electricity rates. Industry insiders consider the agency figures to be a lowball estimate. The health benefits, meanwhile, supposedly range from $33 billion to $81 billion—but only when accounting for unsubstantiated, indirect effects that the agency simultaneously cites to justify other regulations.

    What the regulation does do is fulfill Obama’s campaign pledge to wage war on coal and make electricity prices “skyrocket.”

    The Utility MACT regulation is tailor-made for the Congressional Review Act (CRA)—a procedure by which lawmakers may adopt a “resolution of disapproval” to void a rule. Senator James Inhofe (R–OK) has introduced a CRA on the Utility MACT (S.J. Res. 37), which would also require adoption by the House and the President’s signature.

    The CRA has been successfully used only once—to halt an “ergonomics” rule issued by the Clinton Administration’s Labor Department. Not that there haven’t been a multitude of regulations deserving of its application. But getting both chambers of Congress and the White House to go along presents a formidable challenge, given the regulatory penchant of elected officials these days.

    That’s unfortunately apparent in the case of Senator Lamar Alexander (R–TN) and Senator Mark Pryor (D–AR), who have joined with the Obama Administration in defending the Utility MACT. As if the regulatory problem is simply one of time, the two Senators are proposing to give utilities a total of six years (rather than the current four) to fully comply. But more time won’t mitigate the enormous costs of the regulation or the threat it poses to energy supplies and reliability.

    Utility MACT is no ordinary regulation. So stringent are the standards that potentially dozens of coal-fired power plants will close rather than incur the unsustainable costs of compliance. All of which is made even worse by other major regulations intended to punish the use of fossil fuels recently unleashed by the Administration.

    Proponents claim public health is at stake. That’s sheer nonsense. EPA’s benefits calculation is wildly overblown. For Members of Congress, the policy choice should be clear: Either they jeopardize the nation’s power grid or pull the plug on the agency’s latest power grab.

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to Pulling the Plug on Obama’s Energy Scheme

    1. Erik Osbun says:

      We have no choice. We must get rid of Obama and his EPA.

    2. skip says:

      This should be obamas Waterloo!

    3. Blair Franconia, NH says:

      It should be repealed.

    4. Kathy says:

      We are headed towqrd the socialism that Obama wants with his "fundamentally change this country" He MUST be defeated to save our Republic and self governance. He continues to tramp on the Constitution and thinks he is King! Hope we can resolve this and not need to fight another revolution. Kathy

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.