• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • LOST on the Web Ads

    You may have seen the Web ads: “Five Secretaries of State from Former Republican Administrations Endorse Law of the Sea Ratification,” they declare. The point is obvious: If these grizzled foreign-policy veterans support the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST), so should you.

    But hold on. When it comes to LOST, it’s important to think for yourself before you decide whether to support or oppose a treaty that could cost the U.S. billions but deliver few, if any, benefits. As Heritage’s Steven Groves wrote a year ago:

    Under current law, oil companies are required to pay royalties to the U.S. Treasury (generally at a rate of 12.5 percent to 18.75 percent) for oil and gas exploration in the Gulf of Mexico and off the northern coast of Alaska. The Treasury retains a portion of those royalties, while the rest goes to Gulf states and the National Historic Preservation Fund.

    But if the U.S. was a member of LOST, it would be required to transfer a portion of that royalty revenue—now considered “international royalties”—to the International Seabed Authority, a U.N.-style organization created by the treaty and based in Kingston, Jamaica.

    What would we get in return? “By virtue of its seat on the Council, the United States might be able to hinder decisions to distribute Article 82 revenue for purposes to which it objects,” Groves added. “Whether the United States would be steadfast in its objections to such distributions and whether the Assembly would make any such distributions without the consent of the Council are open questions.”

    It’s not worth taking the chance, he concludes. “Instead of diverting U.S. revenues to such dubious purposes, the U.S. government should retain any wealth derived from the U.S. extended continental shelf for the benefit of the American people.”

    As the Founding Fathers understood, it’s important to remain vigilant against any possible erosion of U.S. sovereignty. “International organizations seek to dictate fundamental aspects of Americans’ personal and professional lives,” Groves writes. “Committees whose members include egregious human rights violators such as Cuba, China, and Syria regularly admonish the U.S. to implement racial and gender quotas, and lecture American families on how to raise and educate their own children.”

    It’s not clear why so many seem ready to hand over American sovereignty so cheaply. But Groves puts down a marker that anyone lobbying for LOST should consider: “The Founders did not risk their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor casting off the rule of King George III so that, two hundred years later, the United States could subject itself to the whims of unelected foreign bureaucrats and international lawyers. Sovereignty was essential to the founding of America in 1776, and it is essential to America today.”

    Posted in First Principles [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to LOST on the Web Ads

    1. WowReally says:

      Steve Groves versus 5 former Republican Secretaries of State. No brainer. The rational choice is the diplomatic professionals who have actual experience representing America's interests across the globe rather than the luxury of being an armchair diplomat behind a desk in DC. These Secretaries have dealt with Vietnam to the Cold War to 9/11 to Iraq and Afghanistan. And somehow Mr. Groves knows what's better for America. Did you guys really take some photos off your office wall of some of the Secretaries because of their oped in support of LOS.

    2. West Texan says:

      Mr. Tucker got it right. As a retired naval [Corps] officer, I was appalled watching C-Span's coverage of the sea service's top brass supporting LOST. The acronym alone says it all. One particular progressive senator, "reminiscent" of a pompous bureaucrat, attempted to characterize the treaty as a benign simple agreement. Hello! Reality begs to differ. Don't let this guy go near a used care salesman as he'd end up buying the whole lot. IMHO, America's history as a nation of laws and defender of freedom can justifiably stand-on its own merit. The senate's guest admirals' appeared to take the path of least resistance by promoting LOST as a necessary addition to their toolbox. Unfortunately, it's a tool that may prove more harmful than helpful given today's malevolent actors. Like Mr. Tucker said, why get LOST in another UN like boondoggle driven by an aggressively subversive membership? America's maritime force is a major player securing today's sea lanes. Don't undermine this peace keeping capability with unnecessary and useless arbitrary rules.

    3. williamddecker says:

      we need to vote anyone out who votes for this out?????? very fuw of these people listen to the american people??

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×