• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • "Tradition" Torpedoes Innovation in Special Operations' Anti-Terrorism Efforts

    It appears that the forces of tradition and status quo have sufficient power to defeat a man who is not normally bested.

    Admiral William McRaven, the decorated Navy SEAL officer who heads Special Operations Command (SOCOM), attempted to use the political capital he had garnered based on Special Forces’ recent successes—such as the killing of Osama bin Laden and the rescue of hostages from Somali pirates—to give them more autonomy in performing missions. President Obama has recently touted the virtues of these elite units.

    McRaven is not a politician, but he did see an opportunity to improve how the U.S was conducting the war on terrorism by specifically targeting their leadership around the world. During the Bush Administration, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld tried to shift the leadership of this war to SOCOM, recognizing that it was globally oriented and uniquely skilled to work across the geographic boundaries of the more traditional combatant commanders.

    At that time, senior SOCOM officers were not willing to shift away from the system known as the Unified Command Plan. McRaven proposed that he be allowed to inform the relevant combatant commanders and ambassadors when he was planning an operation rather than having to seek their permission. He also wanted to avoid the archaic and glacial system of interaction with other militaries known as the Security Assistance Programs. These are mostly outdated processes of the Cold War that channel American military equipment to other countries. The process is agonizingly slow and notoriously inefficient. Telling SOCOM to go through Security Assistance is roughly equivalent to telling it to stay home and stay out of the way.

    However, the State Department and the geographic commanders jointly rebuffed McRaven’s proposal.

    At a time when there are huge threats to the readiness of the U.S. military, hindering SOCOM by insisting on outdated practices and structures is detrimental to national security. McRaven requested additional autonomy so he could continue to field the most effective force in the world. U.S. leadership should trust his wisdom and dedication and see to it that his national security proposals are implemented.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to "Tradition" Torpedoes Innovation in Special Operations' Anti-Terrorism Efforts

    1. Vince says:

      Just what we need is a bunch of crazy Special Operations idiots without any adult supervision.

      Military operations are planned top-down so that they connect into larger planned operations. If you simply issue the Special Operations boys a "license to kill" and ask that they let you know when they're finished, there isn't much point pretending that they work for DoD.

      If we've reached the point that the ONLY use for our very expensive to own Elite Light Infantry is assassination, then I'd say we should disband them as quickly as possible.

    2. Davis says:

      While I don't agree with the previous poster's characterization of SOF. There is a structure called the National Command Authority and it ensures operations carried out, not only by SOF, but by all of the US Forces are cleared before they're set in motion and in sync with US vital interests . The SAP is vital in ensuring this civilian led government is in the loop and able to cover all the bases in the event something goes awry.

      You can't convince anyone that Admiral McCraven couldn't get what he wants, when he wants it, IF he needed it.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×