• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Company Lobbies for More Federal Funds While Over-billing Amtrak

    A company that has lobbied for greater federal transportation funding may have overcharged the federal government by millions for a construction contract, according to a recent report by federal watchdogs.

    Watsonville, California-based Granite Construction has been prodding Congress to maintain or increase federal funding for transportation construction projects. The company’s president and CEO pleaded for “significant new investment in our transportation system” at a Senate Environment and Public Works hearing in January.

    Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA), who chairs the EPW Committee, touted Granite as a stimulus success story during her successful 2010 reelection campaign. She met personally with Granite executives the year before to discuss infrastructure spending.

    Granite is “positioned to benefit from future infrastructure stimulus spending,” according to financial observers. The company has spent $210,000 since last year lobbying for legislation that would increase federal transportation funding, according to disclosure forms.

    But a report released last month by Amtrak’s Inspector General revealed that Granite may have overcharged the federal government by more than $2 million in servicing a construction contract related to four New York City-area tunnels.

    From the IG report:

    In December 2002, Amtrak entered into a contract for a firm-fixed amount totaling $66,340,000. As of December 31, 2011, contract modifications had increased the contract value to $84,548,927. The contract’s purpose was to reconstruct and upgrade the ventilation shaft facilities servicing the four East River tunnels in Long Island City, New York. This upgrade required a design change to the original scope of work that extended the critical path of the project.

    Our analysis of the documentation supporting the extended overhead claim showed that the claim was not adequately supported. The extended overhead modification allowed charges to be billed for extended indirect overhead costs resulting from the increase in the contract’s period of performance. However, the contractor claimed direct costs, general and administrative costs, and profit, instead of submitting extended indirect overhead costs. Therefore, we concluded that the contractor’s claimed costs were not allowable under the terms of the contract modification. As a result, Amtrak paid the contractor $2,027,446 for charges that were not adequately supported.

    In summary, we recommended that Amtrak (1) work with the contractor to establish an appropriate claim amount that is supportable and verifiable; and (2) based on the results of that review, recover any unsupported portion of the $2,027,446 paid to the contractor. Amtrak’s Chief Logistics Officer agreed with our finding and recommendations.

    Posted in Featured, Ongoing Priorities, Scribe [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to Company Lobbies for More Federal Funds While Over-billing Amtrak

    1. Pingback: Former NYPD officer awaits decision on federal cancer aid | Student Loans

    2. Bobbie says:

      How dare they! Thieves! Influenced by the democratic party no doubt! If democrats aren't up to following the rule of law, they are not up to governing a free nation. Fakes and phonies! Imprison the thieves and the democratic party! Accountability, where fairness is what fair is and what not enough democrats in high places out of our control, hold themselves to bankrupting the country like it's just another day!

    3. Carol, AZ says:

      What a big surprise!
      Do ya think _if you keep digging and look at _all Federal money flowing to CA _you might find a disproportionate amount of Federal dollars _earmarked to CA with no accountability attached to the funds? $535 Million bankrolled to Solyndra and six other "green machines"_under the promise_ "to create jobs," all now bankrupt.
      There're no saving CA from what they've created becasue CA is "above the law" on all levels.
      The press describe it as : "beiing in bad shape." Hollywood flashes their green backs to re-elect Bo and his home boys, for more earmarks and more handouts.
      Ca is caving-in right under their noses and all Western States know it_ accept CA..
      You've listed one small piece of corruption.

      • Robert says:

        Actually California sends from ten to nearly 100 billios of dollars to the federal government on an annual basis that it never gets back. I know it may be hard to swallow, but those terrible liberal east and west coast cities are where the majority of economic activity happens in this country.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.