• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Opportunity to Showcase Long-Term Commitment to Afghanistan

    The long-awaited NATO Summit being held in Chicago next week with more than 60 heads of state and government in attendance will focus much of its deliberations on the future of Afghanistan. While “transition” has become a buzzword for the NATO mission in Afghanistan, the U.S and NATO Commander in Afghanistan General John Allen is rightly focusing instead on the importance of a long-term Alliance commitment to the country.

    Taking the long view onAfghanistanmeans NATO countries recognize that it is in their collective national security interest to preventAfghanistanfrom ever becoming a terrorist safe haven again. Each NATO country must demonstrate that it will remain committed to Afghanistan’s stability and security long after 2014, when NATO combat operations are scheduled to end. This is important both to reassure average Afghans that the international community will not abandon them like it did in 1989 and to signal to the Taliban that it cannot simply wait out the coalition.

    Summit discussions on Afghanistan should highlight the recently concluded U.S.–Afghanistan Strategic Partnership Agreement (SPA). The SPA was a significant achievement that provides an outline for U.S.–Afghan relations post-2014. While the SPA specifies neither futureU.S.funding amounts nor troop levels, it does offer a broadU.S.commitment to supportAfghanistanfinancially and to bolster democratic institutions and civil society through 2024. It also provides a framework for theU.S.to maintain a residual presence to train Afghan forces and conduct counterterrorism missions.

    The signing of the SPA has already helped build confidence among the NATO allies and encouraged them to make their own long-term commitments toAfghanistan. Just yesterday, the German government concluded an SPA with the Afghan government that commits it to providing around $190 million in annual aid for the Afghan security forces.

    Other NATO countries that have concluded similar agreements includeFrance, theUnited Kingdom, andItaly. Non-NATO countries that have a stake in the future ofAfghanistan, likeIndia, have also inked strategic partnership agreements withKabul.

    Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari received a last-minute invitation to the summit with the expectation that Pakistan will reopen NATO supply routes that have been shut down ever since NATO forces accidentally killed 24 Pakistani soldiers along the Afghan border last November. A failure by Pakistan to announce the reinstitution of the routes by the summit would prove embarrassing for NATO members.

    Pakistan had previously demanded an apology from the U.S. for the November attack before it would agree to reopen the transit routes. The U.S. apparently was willing to provide it, until the Pakistan-based Haqqani network conducted brazen coordinated attacks in Kabul and other parts of Afghanistan on April 15. U.S. officials and Members of Congress have grown increasingly frustrated with Pakistan’s lack of action against the network, which is located in Pakistan’s tribal areas bordering Afghanistan.

    The Taliban and Haqqani network sanctuaries inside Pakistan threaten the overall NATO mission in Afghanistan and will be the proverbial elephant in the room in Chicago. President Zardari is likely to professPakistan’s support for Afghan stability, but Afghan leaders will look instead for concrete Pakistani action against Afghan insurgent bases within its territory.

    As David Ignatius pointed out in yesterday’s Washington Post, Pakistanis have been foolish to compromise with the Haqqani network over the last decade instead of working more closely with NATO and the U.S. to uproot terrorism from the region. Now that it is clear the international community will not give up on Afghanistan, maybe Pakistan will finally decide it is time to give up on the insurgents wreaking havoc on its neighbor.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    One Response to Opportunity to Showcase Long-Term Commitment to Afghanistan

    1. Bobbie says:

      It's disturbing to see people (commoners) rise in disdain of America while America is there to help. Sincerity of the countries wanting help comes from their responsibility to pay for that help!

      Human behavior ( and terrorists) can't be controlled but holding accountabilities is more assurance toward civil behavior.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.