• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • A New Trend on Trade in North Carolina

    North Carolinians, like many Americans, are concerned that opening the door to foreign companies will result in the loss of jobs, hurting the economic livelihood of the state and its residents. North Carolina’s elected officials have reflected their concerns on free trade through their voting patterns.

    Both the voters and their representatives should rethink their position on free trade. While expanding on trade relations with other countries may, in some circumstances, lead to a decrease in employment for certain sectors, the overall benefits far outweigh the costs.

    North Carolina continues to be a shining example of this concept. In an economy that has relied on textile production since the aftermath of the Civil War, increased competition at the international level provided the North Carolina economy the chance to diversify into new market ventures. Today, North Carolina ranks 10th in states whose employment is most driven by foreign direct investment (FDI) and has enjoyed consistent long-term growth in GDP, ranking in the highest quintile of economic growth among the 50 states in 2010.

    Openness to foreign investment and trade can also aid in alleviating the state’s current employment woes. Many of North Carolina’s strongest job-creating sectors, namely retail and manufacturing, are heavily dependent on their ability to procure imports or put their exports on the open market. FDI itself accounts for more private-sector job creation than any sector in North Carolina other than retail. In fact, foreign investment from such companies as Daimler Trucks, Electrolux, and Syngenta have led to the creation of thousands of jobs in North Carolina.

    With contributions from these and other foreign companies, North Carolina continues to grow and prosper. Yet the protectionist mindset continues to push representatives in the opposite direction. Taking a lesson from the Tar Heel State, Americans should work to change this anti-trade sentiment if they want to see continued improvements in overall economic output and the standard of living.

    Posted in Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×