• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • U.N. Population Control Agenda in the Shadow of Chen Controversy

    In recent days, the international spotlight on Chen Guangcheng, the Chinese lawyer and human rights activist who has spent his life trying to expose and stop forced abortions and sterilizations in China, has refocused attention on coercive population control programs. Meanwhile, the 45th Session of the Commission on Population and Development (CPD) met at the U.N. last week to discuss the priority theme of adolescents and youth.

    The CPD meeting, typically a favorite of population-control activists and radical feminists, was no different this year. In UN parlance, “sustainable development” is often code for population control, and its advocates insist that poverty and its related ills are the result of overpopulation. The prescriptions they advance are centered on so-called family planning efforts, including sterilization and the liberalization of abortion laws, irrespective of cultural or religious opposition.

    At the CPD meeting, discussions on education, economic freedom, and employment opportunities—the kinds of solutions many would consider practical and effective in promoting development—were sidelined or neglected completely. Setting the tone, Secretary General Ban Ki-moon stressed in his opening speech the need for reproductive health care for young people. The statement submitted by Ipas, a non-governmental organization with U.N. accreditation, explicitly called for greater sexual and reproductive rights for children.

    Calls for “comprehensive sexuality education” were numerous. In its written statement submitted to the CPD, the International Planned Parenthood Federation called on all U.N. member states to “ensure that a comprehensive package of sexual and reproductive health services, including safe abortion services, is available for all young people,” an age group it defines as those ages 10 to 19 years old.

    At the conclusion of the week-long meeting, the commission adopted the chairman’s text of the outcome document, something of a consensus document reflecting the negotiations over specific language. While this outcome document contained plenty of objectionable language, pro-family delegations succeeded in limiting the opposition’s efforts to include language about “sexual rights” and “global access to safe abortion.”

    The effort to link “population control” with “reproduction” is nothing new—in fact, earlier this year, the annual U.N. Population Award was awarded to American “Reproductive Health Pioneer” Adrienne Germain, whom the United Nations Population Fund credits as the first scholar to develop the notion of “reproductive health” and linking fertility and population policies with the status of women. But there has been a renewed effort on the part of reproductive rights advocates to insert themselves into the international development agenda by cultivating alliances with the climate change crowd.

    These efforts are reaching a fever pitch as the U.N. system continues its preparations for the upcoming “Rio+20” meeting in June, which has the joint themes of creating “a green economy in the context of sustainable development and poverty eradication” and discussing “the institutional framework for sustainable development.”

    The conference is expected to produce an outcome document containing a set of Sustainable Development Goals. It would be no surprise to see the language of population control permeate the discussions and resulting documents.

    Posted in Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to U.N. Population Control Agenda in the Shadow of Chen Controversy

    1. Rob says:

      I don't trust the UN. They have an atheist agenda that is against that of America. I think “global access to safe abortion" is extremely bad because there is no way aborted children can go to heaven without baptism.

      • Guest says:

        Wow. Why would God punish an innocent? Your theology frightens me.

      • JoeyDG says:

        You need to watch a recent video about where the UN is headquartered in Jerusalem. Bible prophesy, regardless of whether you accept the doctrine or not, is coming true.

    2. Stirling says:

      The Liberal progressive movement in America has a population control history as well.. The founder of Planned Parrenthood (Margaret Sanger) was notirious for wanting sterilization for Blacks. Rather then have faith in people's decisons, progressives like Sanger saw a threat in a growing population that could not be controlled, or wasn't "pure." By today's standards this administration would call her "racist."

      The UN is the biggest threat to freedom in the world today, due to their "Elitist" ideology, and having an administration which shares the "Elitist" ideology is why this country is in trouble (unlike in previous administrations which supported our soverignty, and told the UN to pound sand.)

    3. Bobbie says:

      when people are accountable for their own they make appropriate choices and decisions on their own.
      Giving people something to think about is Chen's offense which reveals more of the weakest of mankind who should be rightfully dismissed from U.N. authority.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×