• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Obama's Afghanistan Visit Timed Conveniently for Campaign Impact

    President Barack Obama delivers an address to the American people on US policy and the war in Afghanistan during his visit to Bagram Air Base (AFP PHOTO / POOL / Kevin LAMARQUEKEVIN LAMARQUE/AFP/GettyImages)

    This week, the President marked the death of Osama bin Laden with a self-congratulatory campaign ad. If Lincoln had spent the entire Gettysburg Address talking about himself, it wouldn’t have been quite that crass. Now, the President zips to Afghanistan—coincidentally on the anniversary of the Seal Team Six raid.

    House Armed Services Chairman Buck McKeon (R–CA) wryly noted that the visit came “[a]fter nearly a year of not speaking about the war and 17 months of not visiting the war zone.”

    Obama’s remarks from “an undisclosed location” at Bagram Air Base included a few zingers that leave one wondering if all the speechwriters have left to join the campaign staff.

    The biggest “I can’t believe he said that” moment had to be “We can see the light of a new day on the horizon.” Okay, so at least he didn’t declare it was “a light at the end of the tunnel.” Different metaphor—but it still had that used car salesman feel.

    What the President did not discuss is how he has made a muddle of the counterinsurgency strategy in Afghanistan since day one. After dawdling for months before making his “decisive” decision, Obama promptly gave the commanders on the ground about half the troops they requested, and he gave them about half the time they said they needed before he started drawing down the troops. In his speech tonight, the President declared that the U.S. needs “a clear timeline to wind down the war.” Coincidentally, like his surprise trip to Kabul, the timeline just happened to fit with his reelection campaign.

    The President’s object lesson in self-congratulatory speechwriting obscured the only real ray of light in his dismal Afghan policy: the signing of the Strategic Partnership Agreement (SPA). As Heritage regional expert Lisa Curtis wrote, “[t]he agreement will both demonstrate to the Afghans that the U.S. will remain committed to the country long after 2014 and provide a framework for the U.S. to maintain a residual presence to train Afghan forces and conduct counterterrorism missions.” In other words, while the President has put all the success in Afghanistan in jeopardy by hastily heading for the exit, there is a framework that would allow the U.S. to go back in and fix it—so we don’t just wind up back where we started on September 10, 2001.

    Curtis notes:

    Concluding the SPA demonstrates the U.S. will not abandon Afghanistan like it did in 1989. It also spells out an important U.S. red line to the Taliban, who have long called for expelling all foreign forces from the country. The Taliban criticized the Afghan government for moving forward with the SPA, saying the U.S. goal was to prevent the institution of a true Islamic government and to establish an army hostile to Islam that protects Western interests in the region.

    Curtis concludes her analysis on a cautionary note. “The question is whether the Taliban would agree to restart talks with the U.S. in light of the agreement,” she points out. “From the U.S. perspective, talks with the Taliban are desirable only if they result in ensuring that Afghanistan will never again become a base for international terrorists.”

    For now, the U.S. is better off focusing its resources on supporting anti-Taliban elements that share U.S. goals in the region. The President should spend a lot more time focusing on that goal than worrying about how Afghanistan plays in his reelection.

    And he should get better speechwriters.

    Posted in Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    6 Responses to Obama's Afghanistan Visit Timed Conveniently for Campaign Impact

    1. Obama today sold American people out for 2 billion Dollars every year till 2014 and 4 billion after 2014 to Afghanistan. President Obama refused to appoint an Inspector general to Afghanistan ! the fraud of arms and weapons to drugs and crimes are a free Market and have been for over 7 months now ! http://www.afghanistannewscenter.com/news/2012/ap

    2. Stirling says:

      6+ years in campaign mode is getting really old.. The next president (Not Obama) really needs to get down to work, and not over-expose themselves as this president has.. Face time does NOT equal progress to the american people, it is a turn- off like playing a top 40 record to death on the radio.. The people are what makes the country great, not a government Holywood wanabee. And please stop taking credit Mr. President for what the SEAL TEAM should get credit for.. (They did the work, you just sat back and watched).

    3. Lloyd Scallan says:

      You don't really think Obama would spend hundreds of throuands of our tax dollars to hold a political
      campaign in Afghanistan do you? Oh, that's right, he's already doing that since last year, all over the U.S. and the world.

      • Jeanne Stotler says:

        Obama started running for reelection before he was sworn in and hasn't stopped. He mis-thought what killing Bin Laden would do helping to 2012 election, so now he has to keep reminding us how good he was and that he too Bin Laden out, never mentions those who were behind and in te act itself. He's been flying all around the world and country on our dime, and his wife thinks she's entitled to live in luxury in foriegn countries on our dime as well. While the "Royal" pair are jetiing all over, their kids in private school, we at home refigure our budgets over and over as increase in Gas and food take bigger pieces out of our checks and BHO brags that the country is spending more?? DUH yes we are spending more but buying less looks good on paper but believe me it's not good in the home.

    4. Bobbie says:

      There's no reason Afghanistan can't take responsibility a year ago, Mr. Obama. If the middle east wants America's presence in the middle east, their integrity will be happy to pay for America's presence and America will be content to know America's wanted. Quit laying the burden of cost on America. Cost is a big part of the responsibility!

    5. ronifer says:

      Our first (and hopefully last) foreign-born president has accomplished so very little to improve the lot of the average citizen, the economy, or the very stature of our country in the eyes of the world. To see him preen like a cock-of-the-walk despite his pathetic performance really shows him up to be the phony that he really is !
      A lack-luster liar of a man with little if any leadership ability !

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×