• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Is the War on Terror Over? Are Islamists Now 'Legitimate'?

    April 20, 2012 - Cairo, Egypt - Egyptian Islamist and Liberal parties march together into Tahrir Square for the first time since early in the revolution.

    There’s a bunch of good news coming from one senior official in the State Department. According to this unnamed source, “the war on terror is over,” and “people who once might have gone into al Qaeda see an opportunity for a legitimate Islamism.” That may be true if—and only if—you accept the Obama Administration’s outlook on the Muslim world and the aftermath of the war in Afghanistan—and if you believe that Islamist ideology can, in fact, be legitimate.

    The news of this new perspective comes from the National Journal, which reports that the White House has come to believe that it “has no choice but to cultivate the Muslim Brotherhood and other relatively ‘moderate’ Islamist groups emerging as lead political players out of the Arab Spring in Egypt, Tunisia and elsewhere.”

    Before even considering whether the war on terrorism is over, it’s worth dissecting the unnamed State Department official’s shocking claim about the nature of Islamism. Though Islamists and terrorists might disagree on strategy (not all Islamists would state that the slaughter of innocents is acceptable), their goals are indistinguishable from those of al-Qaeda—a totalitarian society lacking in fundamental human liberties, including fair justice for all, freedom of expression, and economic and religious freedom. To argue that it is a legitimate ideology is on par with saying that totalitarianism, fascism, and communism are legitimate as well. Is that truly the view that President Obama wishes to adopt?

    The turning point in the President’s perspective, according to the National Journal’s Michael Hirsh, came from “the double impact of the Arab Spring, which supplies a new means of empowerment to young Arabs other than violent jihad, and Obama’s savagely successful military drone campaign against the worst of the violent jihadists, al Qaida.” But just how safe is that assumption?

    Heritage’s James Carafano wrote in January that the end of the war on terrorism does not necessarily have a definitive end. Even though Osama bin Laden is dead and U.S. troops are withdrawing from Afghanistan, the enemy is still standing in the field, the Taliban could return to Afghanistan and regain control of parts of the country, and al-Qaeda could follow while it spreads its tentacles in the Middle East and North Africa. What’s more, America remains a target, and at least 44 Islamist-related terrorist plots have been launched and foiled since 9/11. Even if the President can find a symbolic end to the Long War, all may not be well—though he might spin it as such. Carafano explains:

    A war’s end is not always unmitigated good news. Especially if the way it ends sows the seeds of future conflicts.

    When Americans abandoned South Vietnam in 1975, we paid a heavy price. The Soviets interpreted the U.S. withdrawal as a sign America was in retreat.

    The Kremlin redoubled its nuclear weapons building program, sowed dissent in Western Europe, instigated insurgencies in Africa and South Africa, funded transnational terrorist attacks on the U.S., and invaded Afghanistan. The world became a more dangerous [place] after we ran away from Vietnam.

    A belligerently aggressive Iran…an anti-democratic Russia…an expansive China…a wet-behind-the-ears “Dear Leader” in North Korea…enduring threats from narco-terrorists and Islamist terrorists…there is every sign that, when Obama’s four years are up, the world will be a potentially far more dangerous place than it was when he first took office.

    Whatever iconic image comes to mark the end of this Long War, it may also be regarded as the harbinger of the next one.

    It’s understandable that the President would like to declare the war on terrorism to be over, especially under his command. But a symbolic victory could be a Pyrrhic one if the United States turns its back on the Islamist threat that remains in the Middle East.

    Posted in Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    7 Responses to Is the War on Terror Over? Are Islamists Now 'Legitimate'?

    1. Bob Davidson says:

      Who's kidding who, this is phase one of many. Only a fool would breath in relief. The problem is, stupid is as stupid does!

    2. Michael Mandaville says:

      This is just a classic case of complete misunderstanding of the situation by the State Department. By even considering the Muslim Brotherhood as 'moderate', they have demonstrated their incompetence. The challenge is growing non-violent Sharia Creep – when our communities are slowly threatened due to Political Correctness. The State Dept nitwits can't accurately define the enemy. http://www.CitizenSoldierHandbook.com

      • Roger S. says:

        It's not only PC, but also the spreading false notion of cultural equivalence hiding under its mantle, and Islamist "lawfare" against any who challenge this de facto evil. Worst of all, dealing with these potential and real threats is the failure to name them, which has been this administration's overt policy. It is virtually impossible to arm against, much less combat, an enemy one is even not permitted to name, much less define in some concrete fashion.

    3. Jerry Smith says:

      Wow – who knew? I thought the headlines on the local paper would be blaring the news this morning but nothing. I thought the coverage would be like V-J Day complete with a photo of a sailor kissing a girl in Times Square! Either Obummer is totally delusional and actually believes this crap or he thinks we are dumber than we look. Come to think of it, there are probably several brain-dead libs who will buy this story.

    4. Lloyd Scallan says:

      In 2007, Obama declared this is "no longer a Christian nation". In 2009 Obama cancelled the "National Day of Prayer", but prayed with Muslims during the "Muslim National Day of Prayer". Now Obama (not one of his lackeys), declares the "war on (Muslim) terror is over". Today, Obama is embracing the Muslim Brotherhood. How much more proof do we need before we recognize who and what is Obama?

    5. AD-RtR/OS! says:

      If the threat of terrorism is over, it is time to disband the TSA then.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.