• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Why States Should Hop Off the National Standards Bandwagon

    When “states signed on to common core standards, they did not realize…that they were transferring control of the school curriculum to the federal government,” said Sandra Stotsky, 21st Century Chair in Teacher Quality at the University of Arkansas’s Department of Education Reform, speaking at The Heritage Foundation on Tuesday.

    Stotsky and four other education scholars from around the nation met to discuss the Obama Administration’s growing push for Common Core national education standards and why states should resist Washington’s attempt to further centralize education.

    The Obama Administration’s press for common education standards is not the first time the federal government has attempted to meddle in school curriculum, as Williamson Evers, research fellow at the Hoover Institution, explained at Tuesday’s event. While the creation of national standards has been led by the National Governors Association and the Council of Chief State School Officers, the standards have been “pushed by the Obama Administration,” explained Evers. “So this is where we are now. The feds are financing the tests. They’re financing model curriculum.”

    Federal involvement in curriculum, as attorney Kent Talbert of Talbert & Eitel explained, raises critical legal questions. As he points out in a February report, three federal laws prohibit “federal direction, control, or supervision of curricula, programs of instruction, and instructional materials…in the elementary and secondary school arena.” The Obama Administration’s actions to condition federal Race to the Top funding on a state’s adoption of Common Core standards, as well as the Administration’s recent move to condition No Child Left Behind waivers on a state’s adoption of the standards, runs afoul of these laws.

    Beyond the legal issues, the cost of implementing the standards should be of great concern to states, Theodor Rebarber, CEO and founder of AccountabilityWorks, explained. “States did almost no costs analysis” when they signed on to adopt the Common Core standards, Rebarber noted. However, a report he authored earlier this year conservatively estimated the overall national cost for implementing Common Core at a hefty $16 billion.

    What’s more, the standards are unlikely to promote higher educational quality; rather, they will likely impede achievement.

    Jim Stergios of the Pioneer Institute warned that the standards create “a disincentive to innovators long term.” He explained that while the Common Core standards aim to have students take Algebra I in ninth grade, Massachusetts previously set a higher standard to have students take Algebra I in eighth grade. “So it’s really become for us a ‘race to the middle.’”

    The Common Core standards “are leading to a federally controlled and intellectually undemanding curriculum,” Stotsky stated.

    More federal control of education is not the solution to improving educational quality. As Rebarber pointed out, over the last several decades “the whole focus of education reform has been on centralization.” First, “it really was an issue of state control and state authority over local school boards,” he explained. When that failed, the next move was to increase federal authority. “When that didn’t work, we’ve sort of shifted to a national curriculum. So the solution at each point…was greater centralization.”

    “We need to work together to create an alternative paradigm,” urged Rebarber, one that “doesn’t rely on centralization.”

    States across the nation are doing just that: reforming education by putting control back into the hands of parents and local leaders and empowering them with school choice. Common Core education standards would undermine these efforts by giving greater control to Washington. States that have adopted Common Core standards should reverse course and push back on federal control of standards and curriculum, ensuring that the needs of students—not Washington—come first.

    Watch our related video, “Washington’s Latest Education Overreach: National Standards for Schools“:

    Posted in Education, Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to Why States Should Hop Off the National Standards Bandwagon

    1. nwi001 says:

      If we didn't have federal regulation on educational standards, then each state would be at a disadvantage in terms of competition and knowledge.

      For example, one state may teach something about Computer Science that another state does not. If a high school from the latter state was transferred to another school in the former state (due to parents' job transfers), that student would be at a severe disadvantage concerning the knowledge of said curriculum; their test scores could be lower, which affects the school's score and the state's average score (domino effect). The overall effect of educational deregulation would seriously limit our advantages over competing countries (such as China, Japan, and India). If we learn in unison, then we progress for the benefit of the country as a whole.

    2. Pingback: Why States Should Hop Off the National Standards Bandwagon | CMU Web Design

    3. joshua says:

      as a teacher and a centrist democrat, i find it interesting that conservatives figured out this aspect of corporate-federal government education reform before liberals did. what you may not realize is that the version of school "choice" being lauded by the obama administration (and the bush administration before that) is exactly the same sort of bait and switch. they lure us in with the promise of more choice and accountability; then, when it's too late to turn back, the trap springs and local control is gone.

    4. AZ Dad says:

      Where is there a list of States that have signed on to the National Curriculum Standards?

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.