• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Chart of the Week: Crony Capitalism Leads to Higher Sugar Prices

    Sugar producers contribute only a small percentage of value to overall U.S. crop production, yet the industry continues to reap the rewards from government thanks to a significant lobbying presence and sizable campaign donations.

    The result is government interference in the sugar market, which dates to the 1930s Depression. American consumers pay the price in the form of higher prices.

    This week’s chart depicts sugar’s sweet deal. When the federal government hands out favors to sugar producers, they turn around and fund lobbyists and political action committees, leading to yet another case of crony capitalism.

    “Sugar accounts for just 1.9 percent of the value of total U.S. crop production, but sugar producers fund 55 percent of crop-related political action committee (PAC) donations and 34.2 percent of crop-related lobbying expenses,” writes Bryan Riley, the Jay Van Andel senior policy analyst in trade policy at Heritage. “This behavior can result in ‘crony capitalism’—a system in which business success depends on a close relationship with the government.”

    Trade barriers artificially inflate prices by implementing quotas that limit the amount that food manufacturers and consumers can buy from other countries. Riley explains: “If a bakery or a candy company wants to import more sugar than is allowed under the government’s quota, it must pay a prohibitive tariff of 15.36 cents per pound for raw sugar. At current prices, that works out to a whopping 62 percent tariff rate.”

    The U.S. sugar policy also costs taxpayers more every time they choose to buy their favorite candy, cereal or any other sugar-containing product. Studies by the American Enterprise Institute and Sweetener Users Association peg the cost to consumers between $2.4 billion and $3.5 billion per year.

    Riley suggests eliminating the sugar program by giving Americans the choice to remove caps on sugar imports. And don’t just take his word for it. The late Milton Friedman once said: “There are so many stupid things that government is doing that, clearly, it would be in the self-interest of the public at large to have repealed. Who would—who can really on logical grounds defend sugar quotas? There’s no way of defending sugar quotas.”

    Posted in Scribe [slideshow_deploy]

    5 Responses to Chart of the Week: Crony Capitalism Leads to Higher Sugar Prices

    1. KJinAZ says:

      This is the perfect example of how government costs us money in so many ways we don't think about. How much would sugar cost if we took out the government waste? Why in todays world is there so much bribery going on? What do the sugar producers get back from these bribes?

      It's time to take ALL CORPORATE money out of elections. Nothing good can come from corporate campaign donations. It is like a hidden tax on goods that does not need to be there. We need to put an end to the PACs and all corporate contributions. If a candidate can not get the support of the people they shouldn't win. Corporate money provides for all the negative ads, and smear campaigns that frequently are lies or exaggerations ment to destroy their opponents. We can live without these distortions in our elections, and the politicians can live without corporate bribes.

    2. jimmysrighton says:

      great post ! Wish I knew what you guy's did about about how to really make a Blog real ! I am trying to, but I am 49 and got a strange leukemia. No excuses ! Just want to make a difference. My pitiful looking Blog is http://jimmysrighton.wordpress.com/ just my opinion's about fact's ! ya'll be cool !

    3. Bobbie says:

      trapping and insulting Americans has got to stop! Everywhere this government intervenes, Obama corrupts for government gain dumping government burdens on Americans. Obama's government greed puts a world in need! Sick of Obama's discriminating government rules and acts that enhances Obama's false sense of empowerment!

      Sugar does not cause any disease and is a natural form of energy!

    4. Pragmatic says:

      Hopefully Congress actually does something about this now that there is political appetite among the public for this type of thing.

    5. Pingback: The Morning Links (4/24/12) | Lady Liberty 1885

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×