• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Tales of the Red Tape #30: FTC Sticks It to Appliance Makers

    The Dodd–Frank financial strangulation statute transferred a portion of the duties once performed by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. That’s left the FTC to tap its $292 million budget and 1,176 full-time employees for devising stricter regulation of…appliance labels.

    Specifically, the agency intends to prohibit manufacturers from hanging the ubiquitous yellow EnergyGuide labels from clothes washers, dishwashers, and refrigerators. (The current rule defines a “hang tag” as a label ‘‘affixed to the product…using string or similar material.’’) Instead, adhesive labels would be de rigueur. But not just any sticker will do. According to the FTC’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking:

    The adhesive labels should be applied so they can be easily removed without the use of tools or liquids, other than water, but should be applied with an adhesion capacity sufficient to prevent their dislodgment during normal handling throughout the chain of distribution to the consumer. The paper stock for pressure-sensitive or other adhesive labels shall have a basic weight of not less than 58 pounds per 500 sheets (25”×38”) or equivalent, exclusive of the release liner and adhesive. A minimum peel adhesion capacity for the adhesive of 12 ounces per square inch is suggested, but not required if the adhesive can otherwise meet the requirements of this paragraph.

    The proposal also dictates that the labels must be affixed by manufacturers, not retailers (heaven forbid!). However, retailers must reproduce the very same label information in catalogs and on websites.

    The federal label police also are considering whether to require “QR” codes on the EnergyGuide labels. (For the uninitiated, a Quick Response code is a matrix imprint that can be read by a smartphone to connect to information sources.) In this case, the QR code would supposedly provide information about a product’s (hypothetical) impact on global warming.

    All of which is supposedly authorized by the Appliance Labeling Rule (a la the Energy Policy and Conservation Act). The 1979 version of the statute applied to refrigerators, freezers, dishwashers, water heaters, clothes washers, room air conditioners, and furnaces. In predictable fashion, the FTC expanded its authority to central air conditioners, heat pumps, plumbing products, lighting products, ceiling fans, televisions, etc.

    The FTC, according to its proposal, is deeply concerned that hang tags may be more prone to detachment than adhesive labels and thus less secure. They have concluded this because the Government Accountability Office conducted surveillance at 30 stores in 2007 and found that 26 percent of the products had no EnergyGuide label. Just to be sure, the FTC conducted its own investigation of 89 retail locations in nine metro areas and found either detached or missing tags on about 38 percent of the appliances.

    Not to be outdone on label security, officials at U.S. Customs and Border Protection are proposing to turn away imports of consumer products and industrial equipment that do not comply with America’s unparalleled labeling standards.

    Just imagine all the dire ramifications of a missing label, right? So it’s sure good to know that the feds are so diligent about them—especially considering the millions of other matters that government is attending to.

    Posted in Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    11 Responses to Tales of the Red Tape #30: FTC Sticks It to Appliance Makers

    1. Call Me Mom says:

      I want my tax money back – they're wasting it and annoying me at the same time.

    2. Bobbie says:

      totally agree with Mom. this is irrational and corrupt! when will intelligence and human respect commence? When will we see discipline of these "desperate to do anything corrupt?"

    3. HawkWatcher says:

      I'm fed up with being tread upon. This type of overreach won't stop until we elect a majority of Constitution-loving, regular Americans. Send money to conservative candidates. Fight the socialists until they lie beaten; use the historical, destructive nature of their failed statist policies to whip them soundly.

    4. Betsy Ross says:

      It's no wonder the FTC doesn't have time to look into whether oil speculators are raising the price of oil/gasoline. They are VERY busy with this important work! Ridiculous…

    5. Chris in N.Va. says:

      Just another case of government budget/regulatory sticker shock.

      Brought to you by the President's own Hip-hop Youth 3M Program….you know… "Barack H. Obama… Mmm, mmm, mmm."

    6. O_Henry says:

      Make work, busy work, majoring on the minors, officially functioning while functioning officially…

      It all costs money. Tax dollars ARE being spent. Is this where you would spend them?

      TEA Party Anyone?

    7. obamapoop says:

      Unless a false energy tag is affixed, thereby duping the public, shouldn't the market decide if an appliance without the tag is successful or not? I am fairly sure that we have fraud laws, which means the 292 million can be sent back to the taxpayers.

    8. David Lis says:

      Doesn't anyone want to know how much energy the appliance they're about to buy is going to use? The FTC Energy Guide labels provide this info in a consistent way. I say the more information I can get as a consumer the more informed decisions I'll make. Energy efficiency is our country's most effective tool to address our energy challenges. These changes that are being proposed largely improve a labeling system that I believe our tax dollars are worth supporting.

    9. Gabby says:

      Since when is providing consumers with more information on which to base their choice a bad thing for an efficient economy?
      When I buy food at the store, I'm very thankful there's a label that tells me the ingredients inside, so I can exert my consumer choice in an informed way (and avoid making a friend allergic to peanuts sick, for example). Knowing that I'll be saving an extra $50 a year on my utility bills if I buy an efficient water heater is just as important to me. That's money I can spend to pay my mortgage, go to a baseball game, or re-inject my savings into the economy in other ways.

    10. talgus says:

      solution: all federal regulators must have 120 sq inches of warning labels affixed to their faces warning that they are dangerous to the health of a vibrant economy.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.