• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • DeMarco Warns of the Dangers of Large-Scale Forgiving of Mortgage Debt

    To hear certain parts of the press tell it, the acting director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), Ed DeMarco, announced that the agency is willing to consider wholesale write-downs of underwater mortgages in a recent speech on the subject. However, a closer reading of DeMarco’s speech and the news stories shows that he actually understands the dangers of such a move. Even The New York Times noted that “His comments left doubt about whether he would change his long-held stance against principal reduction.”

    The agency—which now controls both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, since those two housing giants essentially failed back in 2008—has been under heavy pressure from consumer organizations and some more liberal Members of Congress. In fact, many of them have been calling for DeMarco’s firing because of his opposition to such a move.

    The press has focused on the fact that a new FHFA study unveiled at the recent speech showed a combined $1.7 billion reduction in expected losses for the mortgage entities under FHFA’s control. This would reduce the amount that taxpayers must pay to cover those losses. However, DeMarco also noted that under one of the many Obama mortgage refinancing programs, Treasury would provide a total of $3.8 billion in incentive payments for that action, thus leaving taxpayers with a net additional cost of $2.1 billion.

    In DeMarco’s words:

    So in summary, on just an NPV [net present value—a type of analysis] basis, this updated analysis would show a positive benefit to the Enterprises of $1.7 billion and Treasury incentive payments of $3.8 billion, which would imply a net cost to the taxpayer overall of $2.1 billion.

    In his speech, DeMarco also warned of some of the unpleasant consequences of large-scale forgiveness of mortgage principal that supporters of such a move tend to overlook. For instance, he warned that such a program is unfair to the millions of homeowners who have sacrificed to pay their mortgages.

    There are families that did not move up to that larger house because they weren’t comfortable taking the risk. Perhaps they had to save for college or retirement, and did not want to invest that much in housing. And there are people working multiple jobs, or cutting back on the family budget in many ways, to continue making their mortgage payments through these tough times. Many of these families are themselves underwater on their mortgage, even though they may have made a sizeable down payment.

    DeMarco pointed out that a new public program of mortgage write-downs would encourage many responsible homeowners to default in order to get the same benefit that those who have stopped making mortgages would receive.

    That means, will some percentage of borrowers who are current on their loans, be encouraged to either claim a hardship or actually go delinquent to capture the benefits of principal forgiveness?

    DeMarco noted that even the $1.7 billion in projected loss reduction is based on the assumption that all underwater and delinquent homeowners would participate. He further stated that depending on the proportion who actually do, it would take only as few as an additional 20,000 responsible homeowners to stop paying their mortgages to eliminate those loss reductions.

    In the speech, DeMarco further noted that almost half of the FHFA’s underwater loans also have a second mortgage on them, and an additional amount have private mortgage insurance. These loans would not be affected by a principal write-down, thus benefiting those lenders, and:

    In the event of a subsequent foreclosure, the Enterprises [Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac] bear all the losses of the write down and the third party realizes all the benefits of it before incurring losses, if any.

    There is nothing wrong with writing down the principal of a mortgage as a way to reduce losses, if it is acceptable to the owner of the mortgage and made voluntarily on a case-by-case basis. However, the mass principal write-down advocated by the Obama Administration and some housing advocates would be a serious mistake. Finally, as DeMarco noted, it would do much less to fix housing than other more responsible moves:

    Whether Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac forgive principal or not, the universe of Enterprise borrowers potentially eligible for a HAMP PRA is well less than one million households, a fraction of the estimated 11 million underwater borrowers in the country today. This is not about some huge difference-making program that will rescue the housing market. (emphasis added)

    The far larger group of underwater borrowers who today have remained faithful to paying their mortgage obligations are the much greater contingent risk to housing markets and to taxpayers. Encouraging their continued success could have a greater impact on the ultimate recovery of housing markets and cost to the taxpayers than the debate over which modification approach offered to troubled borrowers is preferable.

    DeMarco may have said that his agency is still studying the concept of large-scale write-downs of mortgage principal, but a close reading of his speech shows he understands why such a move would be very bad policy. He should not give in to pressure to ignore his own good judgment on this issue.

    Posted in Economics [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to DeMarco Warns of the Dangers of Large-Scale Forgiving of Mortgage Debt

    1. KJinAZ says:

      Forgiving Mortgage debt will only destroy markets. It would reward only the irresponsible people, and damage the rest who were not irresponsible. It would also put the government in charge of setting home values. Anyone with a brain knows this would not work. Just look at the track record for their previous attempts at this. Most of the people they have helped to date have again failed on their loans, so we are only prolonging the recovery by buying time for the people who have failed. Throwing good money after bad makes NO sense. This is redistribution at it worst.

    2. Bobbie says:

      How dare this country take advantage of good people living up to their obligations of their livelihoods following rules necessary to maintain the economy for home ownership! How dare lesser qualifications apply at anytime based on anything that effects the economy!

      The temporary invitation stood proud and loud within the last 10 (at least) yrs: "Houses at $350,000 and up! Come on in and get a loan? No money down, no credit check, no background necessary?!" While HOMEOWNERS prior are held to the OPPOSITE RULES that maintain the economy NOW FORCED the CONSEQUENCES in result of these lax, careless rules?!!!!!!! How dare you!

      how dare you put this weight on our shoulders! It's abuse! It's unconstitutional, it's unAmerican! It's a set-up!

      the blog reads: However, a closer reading of DeMarco’s speech and the news stories shows that he actually understands the "dangers of such a move." How dare he stand ignorant to what it's already done and continue to provoke it!

      I'm not saying it's all immigrant cultures of people, but the biggest burdens are those in the immigrant sector! Cultures of people lived in HUTS before their arrival! Tax payers thought they were helping temporarily, but it hasn't stopped! Although people in cultures call themselves family that would do anything to help out family, they live in housing they aren't held accountable to pay for, maintain the property or cover the costs of their utilities????? What are they responsible for besides their culture that is getting preferential treatment by government (outrageously unconstitutional) off our backs who aren't benefited one bit? What are people the "government calls less than human" responsible for that doesn't infringe on anyone else??? What??? SPECIFICS PLEASE!!!

      There's too much this government is in favor of and it isn't America! And if I hear any indication of the government using the term MINORITY as a reason to obligate those the government doesn't deem minority, I'm going to puke again!

      Nobody is minority in AMERICA! Under common law, there's no such thing as being minority to your own race, religion, ethnic background or humanity!!!!!! It is however a peoples' rightful responsibility to their own! And if the government is going to see PEOPLE as MINORITY to the same rules that effects the economy WE ALL LIVE IN then we've lost AMERICA!!!!


    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.