• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • D.C. Votes, but Not for a Representative

    Today is primary day in Washington, D.C. Don’t expect a heated battle for Senator or Representative, though. D.C. does not have those offices. That’s because D.C.’s a federal city, not a state.

    The District’s status has long been a sore spot with some of its residents. Advocates of D.C. voting rights routinely complain that America is the “only democracy in the entire world where the residents of the capital have no vote in Congress” and that “of all the capitals in all the world’s democracies, only Washington, D.C., doesn’t have voting representation or real home rule.”

    Then there are the advocates who invoke the American Founding. The colonists objected to being ruled without their consent, hence the rallying cry “no taxation without representation.” District residents pay taxes but lack representation in Congress. Therefore, it is only just to give D.C. statehood and voting rights.

    But this argument misses the larger principle behind the creation of the District of Columbia: the structure of our Constitution.

    The Founders designed D.C. to protect the federal government. Since the federal government exercises certain powers over state governments, having the capital city located in one particular state would give that state tremendous influence over the federal government. Allowing one state to control the federal government would violate the principle of federalism.

    D.C. residents still have representation and home rule through the local government: D.C. has a city council, a mayor, and local courts. As state and local governments must exercise their authority in accordance with the Constitution, so D.C.’s government must adhere to the Constitution and the Article I, section 8, clause 17 provision granting Congress authority over the District.

    And let’s not forget that D.C. residents still vote in federal elections. The 23rd Amendment gives D.C. a voice in selecting the President and Vice President through the Electoral College, but it reiterates that D.C. it is not a state: D.C. receives the number of electoral votes “equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives in Congress to which the District would be entitled if it were a State.”

    By seating the government in the federal district, the Framers ensured that knowledge and self-interest would coincide so as to promote the District’s needs in the same way that the franchise attunes legislators to their districts’ needs.

    Recently, in an e-mail to D.C. residents, Chief of Police Cathy Lanier praised the introduction in Congress of the Cell Phone Theft Protection Act, which would require wireless commercial services to cut service to stolen cell phones. Lanier lauded “members of Congress who hear [D.C.’s] concerns and are ready to take action.”

    D.C. is not the only major city to have problems with cell phone theft—thefts in Philadelphia, Seattle, and Oakland surpass D.C.—but D.C. is the only major city occupied by 535 Members of Congress. So when D.C. has a problem, it immediately gets Congress’s attention.

    The Founders wisely crafted a federal district for the seat of government. They made the capital independent from, and therefore not subservient to, the authority of a particular state. Residents of the District of Columbia don’t have a Representative or Senator, but they still have the attention of Congress and the protection of the Constitution. If we take the Constitution seriously, the seat of the federal government cannot and should not be located in a state.

    Posted in Featured, First Principles [slideshow_deploy]

    4 Responses to D.C. Votes, but Not for a Representative

    1. Liberty First says:

      "By seating the government in the federal district, the Framers ensured that knowledge and self-interest would coincide so as to promote the District’s needs in the same way that the franchise attunes legislators to their districts’ needs."

      This paragraph makes it pretty clear that you have never set foot inside of Washington DC. The principle that you just articulated has not worked to promote the welfare of DC citizens, but has instead contributed greatly to the city's place as one of the most highly segregated locations (in terms of both race and income) in the country. Yes, if you live within 3 blocks of Capitol Hill, you're golden. Unfortunately, the majority of the city does not lie within spitting range of Eric Cantor's desk.

      Give DC representation, now.

    2. Saltire says:

      Leave it the way it is. If DC residents want representation, then move to Maryland or Virginia.

      The founders rationale is still valid today.

    3. Citizenw says:

      You say:

    4. Tyler says:

      I think that representation is unconstitutional. When the district was created it didn't even have a mayor or city council because the president and congress took place of those offices. The founding fathers intentionally didn't give DC voting rights so that the federal government wouldn't be influenced by the politics of the surrounding area. Also, I wouldn't say that DC has no representation, they are represented by all members of congress, so if anything they have more voting rights. I would however support taking away federal taxes from DC since they do not have direct voting rights.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.