• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Snails-Pace Senate Finally Moves on Public Diplomacy Chief

    Belatedly, last week, the new Undersecretary for Public Diplomacy, Tara Sonenshine, and a bundle of other diplomatic nominees received the Senate stamp of approval.

    Having someone competent and knowledgeable to steer the U.S. government’s communication to the rest of the world is critically important. Yet this job has been vacant one-third of the time since it was created in 1999, contributing to a disjointed and intermittent U.S. public diplomacy policy.

    Sonenshine, the former executive vice president of the U.S. Institute of Peace, has been waiting in the wings since her nomination hearings in December. Unlike her predecessor, Judith McHale, a Discovery Channel executive and Hillary Clinton supporter, Sonenshine has longstanding experience of the U.S. government and its workings, going back to the Clinton National Security Council as well as private-sector broadcasting experience. She has her work cut out for her.

    McHale spent her three years in office, focusing mainly on completing the bureaucratic integration (begun in 1999) of the U.S. Information Agency into the State Department. She added six new assistant secretaries for public diplomacy in the State Department’s regional bureaus and one in the press office to deal with foreign media. She also created the Center for Strategic Counterterrorism Communication within State.

    Sonenshine’s challenge will be to grapple with several substantive issues:

    • The challenge from China, whose aggressive public diplomacy advances are well-documented and were the topic of hearings in the House Foreign Affairs Committee last week.
    • The great upheaval at U.S. International broadcasting, whose leadership, the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG), is proposing to lay off some 25 percent of the staff, replacing many with contractors and moving away from broadcasting to digital information dissemination. Holding a seat on the BBG, an active undersecretary for public diplomacy can have an influential voice in this process.
    • Evaluating the State Department’s e-diplomacy efforts, which reportedly now employ 150, a number that appears to be growing exponentially. Are we spending U.S. tax dollars wisely? That will be the first litmus test.

    Image used under Creative Commons from chinwagcom.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to Snails-Pace Senate Finally Moves on Public Diplomacy Chief

    1. Patrick Cronin says:

      Helle,
      Thank you for underscoring the importance of public diplomacy and our general inattention to it as a vital instrument of policy. I agree with you that Tara Sonenshine brings a breadth of experience to the post (she is tremendously well qualified), but she will need to tap every bit of it to help harness our government's communications. Perhaps before talking about China, Tara may want to be certain the administration is clear about what it wants from China.

      Patrick

    2. Brian Carlson says:

      Glad that you focused on the policy issues facing public diplomacy and Under Secretary Sonenshine, Helle. She has an important advantage over some predecessors because she already understands foreign policy issues. It is hard enough to learn how the U.S. Government works, or how to make it work, without having to also learn the substance too.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×