• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • President Obama's Education Budget Buster

    President Obama’s near-term spending proposals for the Department of Education (DOE) are a staggering display of federal profligacy.

    They include the recently released fiscal year (FY) 2013 budget request and an education “blueprint” outlining $60 billion in additional spending. If enacted, these proposals would mean that in one term, President Obama has spent almost as much on education as President George W. Bush spent in two terms—even considering the fact that Bush nearly doubled the size of the DOE.

    President Obama’s FY 2013 budget request for the DOE increases the agency’s discretionary budget to $69.8 billion, a 2.5 percent increase over 2012 levels—the largest increase of any domestic agency—and an 18 percent increase over 2008 levels. But Representative John Kline (R–MN), chairman of the House Education and the Workforce Committee, notes that the proposed spending is even higher:

    In his budget proposal, the president has requested $69.8 billion in discretionary spending for the Department of Education, a $1.7 billion increase over last year’s funding level. This is in addition to $13.3 billion in additional mandatory spending for Pell Grants, bringing the total budget request to $83 billion—a 40 percent increase from Fiscal Year 2008.

    Spending increases proposed in the President’s budget request are just the tip of the iceberg. The President’s “blueprint” contains $60 billion in new spending proposals that are supplemental to his FY 2012 budget and FY 2013 budget request. The blueprint spending includes $25 billion in federal funding to “keep educators in the classroom,” $5 billion in federal funding to provide additional teachers compensation, and $30 billion in federal funding for school construction.

    In his testimony about the budget before the House Education and the Workforce Committee last Wednesday, Education Secretary Arne Duncan stated that it is “unconscionable for us to ask a generation of students to pay the price for adult political dysfunction.”

    What is unconscionable is for American taxpayers to keep pouring billions into more than 150 federal education programs that are failing children. Increasing spending on the status quo won’t improve outcomes. Instead, policymakers should free states to spend dollars on the education priorities that they believe would best meet student needs.

    Posted in Education [slideshow_deploy]

    One Response to President Obama's Education Budget Buster

    1. Dave H says:

      So, it costs $69.8 billion – this year – to pay off the teachers' unions. Such a bargain. In exchange, the Party of Government gets (1) millions of votes, (2) thousands of activists who put boots on the ground during election season, and (3) free indoctrination of America's youth.

      Oh, right. It's "for the children."

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.