• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • CBO Shows Obama's Budget Produces More Staggering Spending and Debt

    The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimate of the President’s budget reveals a reckless fiscal plan that shirks the spending cuts in the Budget Control Act and increases spending by more than $1 trillion over the next 10 years. It confirms that Obama is the first President to preside over four years of deficits in excess of a trillion dollars. Moreover, it deepens the debt by $3.5 trillion. A few details:

    Higher Total Spending. In the CBO’s analysis, the President’s spending is $1.15 trillion higher between 2013–2022. Roughly half of the increase comes from policy changes and the other half from increased interest payments. The President’s record total spending would hold above 22 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) throughout the decade, “well above the 21.0 percent average seen over the past 40 years,” CBO says.

    Higher Mandatory and Entitlement Spending. Though entitlement spending is the single worst problem in the budget, the President increases mandatory spending by $1.16 trillion through 2022. Most of the increase, $486 billion, comes from reclassifying transportation spending from discretionary to mandatory. Another $366 billion consists of refundable tax credits—payments to individuals and families who have little or no tax liability.

    Hidden Discretionary Spending Hikes. The President’s budget takes the audacious step of ignoring the automatic sequestration spending reductions under the Budget Control Act (BCA) that are scheduled to take effect in January—the same legislation he signed to get a $2.1 trillion increase in the debt limit to nearly $16.4 trillion. He does this by increasing spending by $1 trillion over the next 10 years rather than staying within the BCA caps and by discarding the overall level of sequestration cuts. Then the President claims to offset this spending increase with two large budget gimmicks.

    • First, the budget claims $810 billion in new savings from reductions in spending that were already scheduled to occur for activities in Iraq and Afghanistan. It is curious that CBO credits the President’s budget with these phantom savings, as CBO’s director previously disavowed them.
    • Second, the Administration counts $486 billion in reductions just from the reclassification of transportation cited above.
    • Without these two gimmicks, the President’s discretionary spending would actually be $697 billion higher—on top of the $1 trillion increase—over the next 10 years, based on CBO’s figures.

    Deeper Deficits. The combination of policies in the President’s budget produces cumulative deficits of $6.4 trillion through 2022, $3.5 trillion more than CBO’s baseline—sharply different from the more than $5 trillion in deficit reduction the President’s budget claimed.

    Mounting Debt. Debt held by the public in the President’s budget remains at more than three-fourths the size of the entire economy throughout the decade. By 2022, the President’s proposals would send debt to 76.3 percent of GDP, rather than rein it in below the 61.3 percent in CBO’s baseline.

    In the final analysis, CBO’s new report confirms earlier assessments that the President’s budget is an empty political document that pays short shrift to solving the nation’s twin crises of spending and debt. His budget stands in stark contrast to The Heritage Foundation’s Saving the American Dream: the Heritage Plan to Cut Spending, Fix the Debt and Restore Prosperity.

    Because the Senate refuses to pass a budget of its own, the burden is now shouldered solely by House Budget Committee Chairman Paul D. Ryan (R–WI) to build on his successes last year and produce a House budget that will fix the nation’s daunting fiscal outlook.

    Posted in Featured, Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    8 Responses to CBO Shows Obama's Budget Produces More Staggering Spending and Debt

    1. Stirling says:

      Looks pretty clear as to the disreguard of spending concerns by the administration, and assumption that reckless spending has no consequences by the progressive liberals and RINO's in office. At some point a "balanced budget amendment" will become mandatory due to the spending, and I'd recomend people prepare now rather then assume the government will always be able to bail us out.

    2. Ej Carier says:

      Just does not get it.

    3. Roscoe says:

      So why do you think Obama cares…..? There is absolutley NO accountablity or care in the world for Obama… or any other polictician that leaves office after they screw the citizens..>!!! They leave office with book deals, Full insurance and retiremenet benefits, free travel, no car payments, free gas credit card and privilages fully paid expenses for life….. and no need t for him to worry about social security… or …Obama care ( they have their own premium plans). Imagine his daughters having to put up with Obama care…. in a doctors ofiice…!!! Never going to happen.

    4. two things that are not clear to me. 1- what is the Heritage plan. It is one thing to say cut spending, and suggest that entitlement spending is all that hurts us. The largest entitlements are social security, medicaid, and medicare. Does the heritage recomend straight up cuts, fixing the shrinking revenue for those systems, or a combonation of the two. What exactly does the Heritage recomend be cut. and 2- Does the Heritage and the CBO take into account a rising GDP? If they do, what rate of growth do they base their estimates on? If there is no estimate for growth in the GDP in their assesment, do they, and all you readers, understand that the article is worthless?

      • YnotNOW says:

        Steve – your comment is worthless.
        #1 – What is the Heritage plan? Click the link, and read the very detailed and researched plan that Heritage published 6 months ago, and continues to publicize with posts like this. It answers ALL of your questions, if you are willing to read it.
        #2 – If you read, you would also understand that they both project rising GDP. And Heritage's plan assumes a very realistic growth rate, that probably UNDERSTATES the growth that would occur under the pro-growth policies of the "Saving the American Dream" plan.

        One you have read and studied, then you may post your thoughts.

    5. David Lind says:

      When will it end……….hopefully in November…we cannot afford another 4 years of Obama spending.

    6. Todd says:

      Obama's Budget? Really? He does not care. He can throw anything out there and call it a budget. He knows that his socialist democratic party comrades, lead by comrade Harry Reid, will not pass anything that restricts this president's spending. He has a free reign to do what he wants and knows he has cover in Congress.

    7. Lloyd Scallan says:

      Wow, what a surprise! You mean Obama regulations will harm our economy?

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×