• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Getting TSA out of Our Luggage

    Members of Congress have said it before, and they are saying it again: It’s time for the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) to allow new members into the Security Partnership Program (SPP), the nearly eight-year-old program allowing U.S. airports to opt out of federal screening and instead privatize their security forces.

    In a letter to TSA Administrator John Pistole this week, Representatives John Mica (R–FL), Darrel Issa (R–CA), and Jason Chaffetz (R–UT) wrote:

    Airport operators have expressed tremendous interest in the SPP and that expansion beyond the small fraction of the U.S. airports that currently participate in the SPP will allow the TSA to focus on security and oversight.… It is important that TSA take steps to immediately reopen the SPP.

    Congress first mandated that U.S. airports be given the ability to opt out of federal screening in 2001 with the passage of the Aviation and Transportation Security Act. Yet despite these longstanding instructions, Pistole announced early last year that the SPP would no longer be expanded to additional airports. To justify his decision, Pistole claimed that he did not see “any clear or substantial advantage to doing so at this time.

    No clear or substantial advantage? Many would beg to differ. In fact, the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure last year reported that U.S. taxpayers would save “$1 billion over five years if the Nation’s top 35 airports operated as efficiently as [San Francisco International Airport] does under the SPP model.” A 2007 independent assessment found that “SPP airports’ overall performance results are equal to or better than those delivered by non-SPP.”

    As a private-sector alternative to government screening, SPP provides an opportunity for notable cost savings at no apparent cost to security while allowing TSA to get out of the personnel business and truly focus on security. So what is TSA waiting for?

    In February, Members of Congress passed an amendment on the Federal Aviation Administration authorization act reiterating their call to allow airports to opt out of federal screening, requiring that the TSA consider all applications to the SPP program. It’s due time that TSA listen.

    Posted in Featured [slideshow_deploy]

    3 Responses to Getting TSA out of Our Luggage

    1. Bobbie says:

      communication from the government take over side is nothing but blatant lies for appeasement! It's amazing and suspicious that the tsa security groping pat downs and or radiation treatment, there hasn't been one complaint from the ever so complaining, non freedom compliant, non self reliant, Muslims!!!

    2. I don't mind if they're in my luggage, what I mind is when they're examining unmentionable areas of my body.

    3. Ruth says:

      President Bush wanted a private sector TSA–not a government union TSA operation paid for by the taxpayers.
      The last two years of the Bush presidency Congress was controlled by the Democrats, who wanted a Federal
      government TSA; the Democrats always support more government spending and do not care about the tax-
      payers who have to pay the bills.

      This poor decision should be rectified by a new Congress and President. The TSA should be converted to a private sector operation. The Air Lines have a vested interest to have security succeed for the safety of their customers, planes, airports, etc. The taxpayers would not have to pay government salaries, benefits,
      and retirement costs. It would be a win-win decision that would benefit the country, economy, and all the

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.