• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • The Rare Earths Distraction

    The U.S., EU, and Japan are suing China in the World Trade Organization (WTO), calling Chinese export quotas on rare earth elements an illegal trade practice.

    The U.S. will most likely win. But the suit is peripheral to real issues and was brought because the U.S. is unable or unwilling to address the true problems in Sino–American economic relations.

    Of the many questionable practices in Chinese trade policy, the rare earths quota is a strange one to pick on. Last year, the quota was barely half-filled; higher prices and expanding supply elsewhere caused demand for Chinese rare earths to plummet.

    Last week, the largest American rare earths company, Molycorp, swung a deal that will lead to Molcorp exporting to China. The fear that China would deny rare earths to the world never made much sense and makes even less now.

    Still, there is in fact something to see here, folks. What the U.S. really wants to complain about is anti-competitive Chinese behavior in rare earths both in the global market and in China itself. Globally, China became the dominant producer by driving everyone out of business with low prices.

    After doing so, Beijing decided that competition was “disorderly” and suddenly discovered environmental harm in rare earth mining. It is now attempting to force consolidation of its rare earth industry. The export quota is a minor symptom of a major illness—China likes rare earth competition only for other countries’ firms.

    This may sound familiar. America complaints about the value of China’s currency, the RMB, have led to a 25 percent appreciation. But almost none of the problems in economic relations have been solved. That’s because the danger isn’t an exchange rate peg or a quota; those are just (minor) tools.

    The heart of the matter is that China subsidizes its firms so they can outcompete everyone else’s internationally but uses regulations to prohibit competition at home. It’s a win-win: China wins at home and China wins overseas.

    The U.S. government has struggled with this for years, for good reasons. The WTO treats subsidies inadequately, and American competition regulations stumble over state-owned companies. But those are the real issues to tackle, not a quota that may not even get filled.

    Posted in Economics [slideshow_deploy]

    One Response to The Rare Earths Distraction

    1. Annie Fields says:

      And the IRONY of course is that in the 1960's we were the world's biggest supplier of rare earths. In comes (via Nixon!) the EPA in the early 70's and BOOM – It's too nasty & dirty to mine. Fast forward 40 years later and the very same greenies who wanted the very same EPA that KILLED U.S. rare earths are SCR*WED because without them these very same greenies can't manufacture all their green solar panels, electric car batteries, etc… which, of course, we need to have because these very same greenies believe in global warming caused by activities like mining dirty nasty things like rare earths…


    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.