• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Politico and Liberal Economists—Not Congress—Considering Tax Tradeoff

    In a recent article titled “Hill Weighs Tax Trade-offs,” Politico reports that Congress is considering lowering the corporate tax rate and replacing the lost revenue with higher tax rates on capital gains and dividends. But the article cites no “Hill sources” considering such an ill-conceived swap.

    There are only vague quotes at the very end of the article from Senators Rob Portman (R–OH) and Max Baucus (D–MT) about the need for corporate tax reform—hardly an endorsement of the plan. This unwise plan has legs only in the minds of the plan’s authors and Politico reporters.

    The plan originates not from congressional sources but from a report by three economists. Politico writer David Rogers devotes a substantial portion of his article to detailing the report and citing its main author, the widely respected Roseanne Altshuler. The plan calls for Congress to lower the corporate tax rate to 26 percent and replace the revenue lost from that rate cut by raising the capital gains rate from the current 15 percent to 28 percent. The dividends rate would also rise from its present 15 percent rate to ordinary income tax rates—43.4 percent starting in 2013.

    It is a step in the right direction that so many are exploring the options and consequences of corporate tax rate reduction, including President Obama, now that he has released his corporate tax reform “framework.” The U.S. badly needs to lower its rate to put our largest businesses on equal footing with their global competitors. But paying for a corporate tax rate reduction with higher tax rates on capital gains and dividends would be one step forward and one giant step back.

    A lower corporate rate is necessary to improve international competitiveness and to lower the cost of capital, which increases incentives for investment. Higher rates on capital gains and dividends would raise the cost of capital and largely wipe out the gains from a lower corporate rate, leaving the economy no better off than before the rate switcheroo.

    Reducing the corporate income tax rate substantially is important, but revenue-neutral reform may prove more difficult than some expect. Every idea is worth considering, but some should be considered only for a moment before being set aside. Raising the capital gains and dividend tax rates is one such discardable notion.

    Posted in Economics [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to Politico and Liberal Economists—Not Congress—Considering Tax Tradeoff

    1. steve h says:

      That chart is a joke. You know very well corporations don't come close to playing that rate. The effective rate is well below that and the top 400 corps pay next to nothing. We need to fix the deficit and debt problem and we can't do it all by spending cuts. Conservative economics have never works, Progressive policy has always proven to be ebtter for the economy and growth and deficit reduction. Everytime a conservative gets in there, it screws up the whole system.

    2. Stirling says:

      This is why the liberal left will never understand economics 101 as it relates to individual freedom. Raising the capital gains and dividend tax rates is a direct threat to peoples incentive to invest, and to their financial security goals for reitirement.. Consider it just annother shifting of the cost from business to the investor.

      (it's the same type of shift the administration did in the contraception issue from the church to insurance companies.)

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.